Introduction To Operations Research By Frederick Hillier - Test Bank

Introduction To Operations Research By Frederick Hillier - Test Bank   Instant Download - Complete Test Bank With Answers     Sample Questions Are Posted Below   Test Bank for Chapter 5   Problem 5-1: Consider the following problem.   Minimize   Z =   x1 + 2 x2, subject to -x1 + x2    £ 15 …

$19.99

Introduction To Operations Research By Frederick Hillier – Test Bank

 

Instant Download – Complete Test Bank With Answers

 

 

Sample Questions Are Posted Below

 

Test Bank for Chapter 5

 

Problem 5-1:

Consider the following problem.

 

Minimize   Z =   x1 + 2 x2,

subject to

-x1 + x2    £ 15

2 x+ x2    £ 90

x2     ³ 30

and

x1 ³ 0, x2 ³ 0.

 

 

(a) Solve this problem graphically

 

(b) Develop a table giving each of the CPF solutions and the corresponding defining equations, BF solution, and nonbasic variables.

 

 

Solution for Problem 5-1:

 

(a)

 

Thus, the optimal solution is (x1, x2) = (15, 30) with Z = 75.

 

(b)

The above graphical solution reveals that the problem has three CPF solutions, as listed in the first column of the table below. The corresponding defining equations are the equations of the constraint boundaries (the solid lines in the above graph) that pass through the respective CPF solutions, as listed in the second column of the table below.

To identify the corresponding BF solutions and nonbasic variables, we need to use the augmented form of the problem.

 

Introducing slack variables, x3 and x4, and surplus variable x5, we have

 

Minimize   Z =   x1 + 2 x2,

subject to

– x1 + 2 x2  + x3                    = 15

2 x1 + x2               + x4        = 90

x2                                       – x5 = 30

and

x1 ³ 0, x2 ³ 0, x3 ³ 0, x4 ³ 0, x5 ³ 0.

 

Also introducing an artificial variable x6 into the last constraint is optional, since this variable would be needed only to initiate the simplex method, which we are not concerned with doing here. If x6 is introduced, it would become an additional nonbasic variable (so its value would be 0) in the last two columns of the table below.

For each CPF solution, the corresponding BF solution listed in the third column is obtained by calculating  x3,  x4  and x5 in the augmented form of the problem. The nonbasic variables listed in the last column are the variables whose values are 0 in the BF solution.

 

 

CPF Solution

(x1, x2)

Defining Equations BF solution

(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)

Nonbasic variables
(15, 30) x2   = 30,

– x1 + x2  = 15

 

(15, 30, 0, 30, 0) x3, x5
(30, 30) x2   = 30,

2 x1 + x2  = 90

 

(30, 30, 15, 0, 0) x4, x5
(25, 40)      – x1 + x2  = 15,

2 x1 + x2  = 90

 

(25, 40, 0, 0, 10) x3, x4

 

 

Problem 5-2:

Consider the following problem.

 

Maximize        Z =  2x1 + 4x2 + 3x3,

subject to

x1 + 3x2 + 2x3 ≤ 30

x1 +   x2 +   x3 ≤ 24

3x1 + 5x2 + 3x3 ≤ 60

and

x1 ≥ 0,   x2 ≥ 0,   x3 ≥ 0.

 

You are given the information that  x1 > 0,  x2 = 0, and  x3 >0 in the optimal solution.

 

Using the given information and the theory of the simplex method, analyze the constraints of the problem in order to identify a system of three constraint boundary equations (defining equations) whose simultaneous solution must be the optimal solution (not augmented). Then solve this system of equations to obtain this solution.

 

Solution for Problem 5-2:

 

Since x1 > 0 and x3 > 0,  it follows that x1 = 0 and x3 = 0 cannot be part of the three defining equations at the optimal solution. Since x2 = 0, then x1 + x3 £ 24 and 3 x1 + 3 x3 £ 60 or, equivalently, x1 + x3 £ 24 and x1 + x3 £ 20. This implies that the second constraint (x1 + x2 + x3 ≤ 24) must have some slack, so its constraint boundary equation cannot be a defining equation at the optimal solution.

We now have ruled out three of the six constraint boundary equations as being part of the defining equations at the optimal solution. For this three-variable problem, each CPF solution including the optimal solution must have three defining equations. Therefore, the three constraint boundary equations not ruled out must be the defining equations for the optimal solution. These defining equations are

 

x2 = 0,

x1 + 3 x2  + 2 x3 = 30,

3 x1 + 5 x2  + 3 x3 = 60.

 

Solving this system of equations yields the optimal solution as (x1, x2, x3) = (10, 0, 10).

 

 

Problem 5-3:

You are using the simplex method to solve the following linear programming problem.

 

Maximize        Z = 6x1 + 5x2x3 + 4x4,

subject to

3x1 + 2x2 – 3x3 +   x4  ≤ 120

3x1 + 3x2x3 + 3x4  ≤ 180

and

x1 ≥ 0,  x2 ≥ 0,  x3 ≥ 0,   x4 ≥ 0.

 

You have obtained the following final simplex tableau where x5 and x6 are the slack variables for the respective constraints.

 

    Coefficient of:  
Basic Variable  

Eq.

 

Z

 

x1

 

x2

 

x3

 

x4

 

x5

 

x6

Right Side
Z (0) 1 0 0 Z*
x1 (1) 0 1 0
x3 (2) 0 0 1

 

Use the fundamental insight presented in Sec. 5.3 of the textbook to identify Z*, , and .

 

Solution for Problem 5-3:

 

The fundamental insight presented in Sec. 5.3 of the textbook states in part that

 

Z* =y*b,

 

= S*b,

 

where y* =  is the vector of coefficients of the slack variables in Eq. (0),

 

S* =

 

is the matrix of coefficients of the slack variables in the remaining equations, and b is the vector of the original right-hand sides. (Since S = B-1, where B is the basis matrix, and y* = cBB-1, where cB is the vector of the objective function coefficients of the basic variables, this alternative notation may be used throughout this solution.)

 

Therefore,  the final right-hand side is

= S* b = =, and

 

Z* = y*b =  = 315.

 

 

 

Problem 5-4:

Consider the following problem.

 

Maximize        Z = 2x1 + 4x2 + 3x3,

subject to

x1 + 3x2 + 2x3 = 20

x1 + 5x2          ≥ 10

and

x1 ≥ 0,  x2 ≥ 0, x3 ≥ 0.

 

Let   be the artificial variable for the first constraint. Let x5 and  be the surplus variable and artificial variable, respectively, for the second constraint.

You are now given the information that a portion of the final simplex tableau is as follows:

 

    Coefficient of:  
Basic Variable  

Eq.

 

Z

 

x1

 

x2

 

x3

   

x5

  Right Side
Z (0) 1       M+2 0 M  
x1 (1) 0       1 0 0  
x5 (2) 0       1 1 -1  

 

 

(a) Extend the fundamental insight presented in Sec. 5.3 of the textbook to identify the missing numbers in the final simplex tableau. Show your calculations.

 

(b) Identify the defining equations of the CPF solution corresponding to the optimal solution in the final simplex tableau.

 

Solution for Problem 5-4:

 

(a)

If  and  had been placed in adjacent columns in the initial tableau, their coefficients in Eqs. (1) and (2) would form an identity matrix. Therefore, by the logic of the fundamental insight presented in Sec. 5.3 of the textbook, it is the coefficients of these variables in the final tableau that play the key role. In particular, using the notation of the fundamental insight, y* = [2   0] is the vector of coefficients of the artificial variables in Eq. (0) after subtracting their values [M   M] in the initial tableau (before restoring proper form from Gaussian elimination). Similarly,

 

S* =

 

is the matrix of coefficients of the artificial variables in the remaining equations. (The notation of Sec. 5.2, replacing S* by B-1 and replacing y* by cBB-1, also may be used instead.) Therefore, using the other notation employed in Sec. 5.3 as well, we can obtain the missing elements in the final tableau from the formulas for the fundamental insight as follows.

 

The final constraint columns for (x1, x2, x3) are

 

            S*A = =.

 

The final coefficients in Eq. (0) for (x1, x2, x3) are

 

            y*Ac =  –  = .

The final right-hand side is

S*b = =, and

Z* = y*b =  = 40.

 

Therefore, after inserting the missing values, the complete final simplex tableau is

 

Basic   Coefficient of: Right
Variable Eq. Z             x1         x2         x3                 x5                 Side
Z (0) 1             0          2         1          M+2    0         M 40
x1 (1) 0             1          3         2          1          0         1 20
x5 (2) 0             0          -2         2          1          1         -1 10

 

 

(b)

The nonbasic variables in the above final tableau yielding the optimal solution are x2, x3, ,  and . x2 and x3 are the indicating variables for the x2 ≥ 0 and x3 ≥ 0 constraints, and  is the indicating variable for the x1 +3x2 + 2x3 = 20 constraint. (  is not an indicating variable except when both x5 and  are nonbasic variables.) Therefore, the defining equations are

 

x1 + 3 x2  + 2 x3   = 20,

x2              = 0,

x3   = 0.

 

 

 

Additional information

Add Review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *