Auditing And Assurance Services 14th Edition By Arens - Test Bank

Auditing And Assurance Services 14th Edition By Arens – Test Bank

 

Instant Download – Complete Test Bank With Answers

 

 

Sample Questions Are Posted Below

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

Auditing and Assurance Services, 14e (Arens)

 

Chapter 5  Legal Liability

 

Learning Objective 5-1

 

• Discuss three major factors that have contributed to the recent increase in the number of lawsuits against auditors and the size of awards to plaintiffs.

 

Answer: Major factors include:

• The growing awareness of the responsibilities of public accountants by users of financial statements.

 

• An increased consciousness on the part of the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding its responsibility for protecting investors’ interests.

 

• The complexity of auditing and accounting functions caused by the increasing size of businesses, the globalization of business, and the complexities of business operations.

 

• Large civil court judgments against CPA firms.

 

• The tendency of society to accept lawsuits by injured parties against anyone who might be able to provide compensation, regardless of who was at fault, coupled with joint and several liability doctrine.

 

• The willingness of CPA firms to settle legal problems out of court to avoid costly legal fees and adverse publicity, rather than pursuing resolution through the judicial process.

 

• The difficulty judges and jurors have understanding and interpreting technical accounting and auditing matters.

 

Terms: Major factors that have contributed to the recent increase in the number of lawsuits against auditors

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-1

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

Learning Objective 5-2

 

• A(n) ________ failure occurs when an auditor issues an erroneous opinion because it failed to comply with requirements of auditing standards.

 

1. A) business B) audit C) ethics D) process Answer: B

Terms: Failure which occurs when an auditor issues an erroneous opinion

Diff: Easy

Objective: LO 5-2

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• Distinguish between what is meant by business failure and audit failure.

 

Answer: Business failure occurs when a business is unable to repay its lenders or meet expectations of its investors because of economic or business conditions, such as recession, poor management decisions, or unexpected competition in the industry. Audit failure occurs when the auditor issues an incorrect audit opinion because it failed to comply with the requirements of auditing standards.

 

Terms: Business failure and audit failure

Diff: Easy

Objective: LO 5-2

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

 

1

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

• Audit risk is the risk there will be an audit failure for a given audit engagement. A) True

 

1. B) False Answer: B

 

Terms: Audit risk

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-2

 

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• The term “audit failure” refers to the situation when the auditor has followed auditing standards yet still fails to discover that the client’s financial statements are materially misstated.

 

1. A) True B) False Answer: B

 

Terms: Audit failure; Followed audit standards and fail to discover material misstatement

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-2

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

Learning Objective 5-3

 

1) In the performance of an audit, a CPA:

 

1. is legally liable for not detecting client fraud.
2. must strictly follow GAAS for privately held clients.
3. must strictly follow PCAOB auditing standards for publicly held clients.

 

1. must exercise due professional care in the performance of their audit responsibilities. Answer: D

 

Terms: Performance of an audit

Diff: Easy

Objective: LO 5-3

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• Auditors who fail to exercise due care in their performance of professional services may be liable for: A) punitive liability.

 

1. B) breach of contract. C) excess liability. D) criminal charges. Answer: B

 

Terms: Liability when auditors fail to exercise due care

Diff: Easy

Objective: LO 5-3

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

• Recklessness in the case of an audit is present if the auditor knew an adequate audit was not done but still issued an opinion, even though there was no intent to deceive financial statement users. This description is the legal term for:

 

1. A) ordinary negligence. B) gross negligence.

 

1. C) constructive fraud. D) fraud.

 

Answer: C

 

Te rms: Legal term for reckless in an audit with not intent to deceive

Diff: Easy

Objective: LO 5-3

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• The standard of due care to which the auditor is expected to adhere to in the performance of the audit is referred to as the:

 

1. A) prudent person concept. B) common law doctrine. C) due care concept.

 

1. D) vigilant person concept. Answer: A

 

Terms: Standard of due care

Diff: Easy

Objective: LO 5-3

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• Auditors may be liable to their clients for:

 

A)

 

Punitive damages	Compensatory damages
Yes	Yes
B)
Punitive damages	Compensatory damages
No	No
C)
Punitive damages	Compensatory damages
Yes	No
D)
Punitive damages	Compensatory damages
No	Yes
Answer: A
Terms: Auditor liability to clients
Diff: Easy
Objective: LO 5-3
AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

 

 

 

3

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

• Under the laws of agency, partners of a CPA firm may be liable for the work of others on whom they rely. This would not include:

 

1. A) employees of the CPA firm. B) employees of the audit client.

 

1. C) other CPA firms engaged to do part of the audit work.

 

1. D) specialists employed by the CPA firm to provide technical advice on the audit. Answer: B

 

Terms: Laws of agency. Partners of CPA firm liable for work of others on whom they rely

Diff: Easy

Objective: LO 5-3

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• “Absence of reasonable care that can be expected of a person in a set of circumstances” defines:

1. pecuniary negligence.
2. gross negligence.
3. extreme negligence.

 

1. ordinary negligence. Answer: D

 

Terms: Absence of reasonable care

Diff: Easy

Objective: LO 5-3

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

8) An example of a breach of contract would likely include:

 

1. an auditor’s refusal to return the client’s general ledger book until the client paid last year’s audit fees.

 

1. a bank’s claim that an auditor had a duty to uncover material errors in financial statements that had been relied on in making a loan.

 

1. a CPA firm’s failure to complete an audit on the agreed-upon date because the firm had a backlog of other work which was more lucrative.

 

1. an auditor’s claim that the client staff is unqualified.

 

Answer: C

 

Terms: Breach of contract

Diff: Easy

Objective: LO 5-3

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• Privity of contract exists between: A) auditor and the federal government. B) auditor and third parties.

 

1. C) auditor and client.

 

1. D) auditor and client attorney. Answer: C

 

Terms: Privity of contract

Diff: Easy

Objective: LO 5-3

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

• An individual who is not party to the contract between a CPA and the client, but who is known by both and is intended to receive certain benefits from the contract is known as:

 

1. A) a third party.
2. B) a common law inheritor.
3. C) a tort.

 

1. D) a third-party beneficiary. Answer: D

 

Te rms: Individual who is not a party to the contract between a CPA and client, but who is known

Diff: Easy

Objective: LO 5-3

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• Laws that have been passed by the U.S. Congress and other governmental units are:

1. statutory laws.
2. judicial laws.
3. federal laws.

 

1. common laws. Answer: A

 

Terms: Laws passed through state legislatures

Diff: Easy

Objective: LO 5-3

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• The assessment against a defendant of the full loss suffered by a plaintiff regardless of the extent to which other parties shared in the wrongdoing is called:

 

1. A) separate and proportionate liability. B) shared liability.

 

1. C) unitary liability.

 

1. D) joint and several liability. Answer: D

 

Terms: Assessment against a defendant of the full loss suffered by a plaintiff

Diff: Easy

Objective: LO 5-3

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• The assessment against a defendant of that portion of the damage caused by the defendant’s negligence is called:

 

1. A) separate and proportionate liability. B) joint and several liability.

 

1. C) shared liability. D) unitary liability. Answer: A

 

Terms: Assessment against a defendant of that portion of the damages

Diff: Easy

Objective: LO 5-3

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

14) Audit fraud occurs when:

 

1. a misstatement is made and there is both knowledge of its falsity and the intent to deceive.
2. a misstatement is made and there is knowledge of its falsity but no intent to deceive.
3. the auditor lacks even slight care in the performance in performing the audit.
4. the auditor has an absence of reasonable care in the performance of the audit.

 

Answer: A

 

Terms: Audit fraud

Diff: Easy

Objective: LO 5-3

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• Which of the following most accurately describes constructive fraud? A) Absence of reasonable care

 

1. B) Lack of slight care
2. C) Knowledge and intent to deceive

 

1. D) Extreme or unusual negligence without the intent to deceive Answer: D

 

Terms: Describes constructive fraud

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-3

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• Which of the following most accurately describes fraud?

1. Absence of reasonable care
2. Lack of slight care
3. Knowledge and intent to deceive

 

1. Extreme or unusual negligence without the intent to deceive Answer: C

 

Terms: Describes fraud

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-3

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

17) A third-party beneficiary is one which:

 

1. has failed to establish legal standing before the court.
2. does not have privity of contract and is unknown to the contracting parties.

 

1. does not have privity of contract, but is known to the contracting parties and intended to benefit under the contract.

 

1. may establish legal standing before the court after a contract has been consummated.

Answer: C

 

Terms: Third-party beneficiary

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-3

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

• If the CPA negligently failed to properly prepare and file a client’s tax return, the CPA may be liable

for:

1. A) the penalties the client owes the IRS.
2. B) the penalties and interest the client owes.
3. C) the penalties and interest the client owes, plus the tax preparation fee the CPA charged.

 

1. D) the penalties and interest, the tax preparation fee, and the amount of tax that was underpaid. Answer: C

 

Terms: Liability when a CPA negligently failed to properly prepare and file tax return

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-3

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• Which of the following, if present, would most likely support a finding of constructive fraud on the part of a CPA?

 

1. A) Gross negligence in applying GAAS

 

1. B) Ordinary negligence in applying GAAS C) Lack of duty to perform

 

1. D) Contributory negligence Answer: A

 

Terms: Support a finding of constructive fraud

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-3

AACSB: Analytic skills

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

• Which of the following statements is true?

A)

 

Gross negligence may
constitute constructive	Fraud requires the	All fraud should be
fraud	intent to deceive	detected during audit
Yes	Yes	No
B)
Gross negligence may
constitute constructive	Fraud requires the	All fraud should be
fraud	intent to deceive	detected during audit
No	Yes	No
C)
Gross negligence may
constitute constructive	Fraud requires the	All fraud should be
fraud	intent to deceive	detected during audit
Yes	No	Yes
D)
Gross negligence may
constitute constructive	Fraud requires the	All fraud should be
fraud	intent to deceive	detected during audit
No	No	No

 

Answer: A

 

Terms: Gross negligence, fraud, and constructive fraud

Diff: Moderate

 

Objective: LO 5-3

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

21) When performing an audit the CPA is required to:

1. exercise the level of care of a reasonably prudent CPA.
2. strictly adhere of GAAS.
3. strictly be liable for detection of material misstatements in the financial statements.
4. avoid gross negligence in the performance of their duties.

Answer: A

 

Terms: Performing an audit CPA required to

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-3

 

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

• Gregory & Hedrick, a medium-sized CPA firm, employed Elise as a staff accountant. Elise was negligent while auditing several of the firm’s clients. Under these circumstances, which of the following statements is true?

 

1. A) Elise would have no personal liability for negligence.

 

1. B) Gregory & Hedrick is not liable for Elise’s negligence because CPAs are generally considered to be independent contractors.

 

1. C) Gregory & Hedrick would not be liable for Elise’s negligence if Winters disobeyed specific instructions in the performance of the audits.

 

1. D) Gregory & Hedrick can recover against its insurer on its malpractice policy even if one of the partners was also negligent in reviewing Elise’s work.

 

Answer: D

 

Terms: Auditor negligent while auditing

Diff: Challenging

Objective: LO 5-3

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• Define ordinary negligence, gross negligence, and constructive fraud.

 

Answer: Ordinary negligence is the absence of reasonable care, whereas gross negligence is the lack of even slight care, tantamount to reckless behavior, that can be expected of a person in a set of circumstances.

 

Constructive fraud is the existence of extreme or unusual negligence even though there was no intent to deceive or to do harm. It is also termed reckless, in the case of an audit is present if the auditor knew an adequate audit was not done but still issued an opinion, even though there was no intention of deceiving statement users.

 

Terms: Ordinary negligence, gross negligence, and constructive fraud

Diff: Easy

Objective: LO 5-3

 

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• An important concept in contract law for accountants to understand is the “third-party beneficiary doctrine”. Explain and give an example.

 

Answer: A third party who does not have privity of contract but is known to the contracting parties and

is intended to have certain rights and benefits under the contract. Example: bank has a large loan

outstanding at the balance sheet date and requires an audit as part of the loan agreement.

 

Terms: Contract law; Third-party beneficiary doctrine

Diff: Easy

Objective: LO 5-3

 

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• Distinguish between constructive fraud and fraud.

 

Answer: Constructive fraud is the existence of extreme or unusual negligence even though there was no intent to deceive or do harm. In contrast, fraud occurs when a misstatement is made and there is both knowledge of its falsity and the intent to deceive.

 

Terms: Constructive fraud and fraud

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-3

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

 

 

 

9

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

• Distinguish between “joint and several liability” and “separate and proportionate liability.” Answer: Under joint and several liability, the defendant can be assessed the full loss suffered by the plaintiff, regardless of the extent to which other parties shared in the wrongdoing. In contrast, under separate and proportionate liability, the defendant is assessed that portion of the damage caused by the defendant’s negligence.

 

Terms: Joint and several liability and separate and proportionate liability

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-3

 

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

27) Match seven of the legal terms (a-j) with the definitions provided below (1-7):

 

1. Common law
2. Constructive fraud
3. Breach of contract
4. Joint and several liability
5. Ordinary negligence
6. Third-party beneficiary
7. Gross negligence
8. Statutory law
9. Fraud

 

1. Separate and proportionate liability

 

________ 1. Laws that have been passed by the U.S. Congress and other governmental units.

 

________ 2. Absence of reasonable care that can be expected of a person in a set of circumstances.

 

________ 3. Lack of even slight care, tantamount to reckless behavior that can be expected of a person.

 

________ 4. The assessment against a defendant of that portion of the damage caused by the defendant’s negligence.

 

________ 5. Failure of one or both parties in a contract to fulfill the requirements of the contract.

 

________ 6. The assessment against a defendant of the full loss suffered by a plaintiff regardless of the extent to which other parties shared in the wrongdoing.

 

________ 7. Existence of extreme or unusual negligence even though there was no intent to deceive or do harm; also termed recklessness.

 

Answer:

1. h
2. e
3. g
4. j
5. c
6. d
7. b

 

Terms: Constructive fraud; Breach of contract; Joint and several liability; Separate and proportionate liability; Gross negligence; Ordinary negligence; Statutory law

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-3

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

• The standard of due care to which the auditor is expected to be held is referred to as the prudent person concept.

 

1. A) True B) False Answer: A

 

Terms: Standard of due care; Prudent person concept

Diff: Easy

Objective: LO 5-3

 

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• In a CPA firm operating as a limited liability partnership (LLP), the liability for one partner’s actions does not extend to another partner’s personal assets.

 

1. A) True B) False Answer: A

 

Terms: CPA firm operating as a limited liability partnership

Diff: Easy

Objective: LO 5-3

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• In a CPA firm operating as a limited liability partnership (LLP), the liability for one partner’s actions does extend to the firm’s assets.

 

1. A) True B) False Answer: A

 

Terms: CPA firm operating as a limited liability partnership

Diff: Easy

Objective: LO 5-3

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• Statutory laws are laws that have been developed through court decisions rather than through the U.S. Congress and other governmental units.

 

1. A) True B) False Answer: B

 

Terms: Statutory laws

Diff: Easy

Objective: LO 5-3

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• The doctrine of joint and several liability is one factor that has contributed to the recent increase in the number of lawsuits against auditors and the size of awards to plaintiffs.

 

1. A) True B) False Answer: A

 

Terms: Doctrine of joint and severa l liability; Contributed to increase in lawsuits

Diff: Moderate

 

Objective: LO 5-3

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

 

 

12

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

• Several states have statutes that permit privileged communication between the client and auditor, allowing a CPA to refuse to testify in state and federal courts.

 

1. A) True B) False Answer: B

 

Terms: CPA and privileged communication

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-3

 

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• Gross negligence is the existence of extreme or unusual negligence with the intent to deceive.

1. True

 

1. False Answer: B

 

Terms: Gross negligence; Extreme or unusual negligence; Intent to deceive

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-3

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

Learning Objective 5-4

 

• Audit contracts (engagement letters): A) may be either oral or written.

 

1. B) must be written.
2. C) must be written and notarized.

 

1. D) must be written if the client is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Answer: B

 

Terms: Audit contracts; Engagement letters

Diff: Easy

Objective: LO 5-4

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• In third-party suits, which of the auditor’s defenses contends lack of privity of contract?

1. A) Lack of duty

 

1. B) Non -negligent performance C) Contributory negligence
2. D) Absence of causal connections

Answer: A

 

Terms: Third-party suits; Auditor defenses contends lack of privity contract

Diff: Easy

Objective: LO 5-4

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

• In connection with the audit of financial statements, an independent auditor could be responsible for failure to detect a material fraud if:

 

1. A) statistical sampling techniques were not used on the audit engagement. B) the auditor planned the audit in a negligent manner.

 

1. C) accountants performing important parts of the work failed to discover a close relationship betw een the treasurer and the cashier.

 

1. D) the fraud was perpetrated by one employee who circumvented the existing internal controls. Answer: B

 

Terms: Independent auditor could be responsible for failure to detect material fraud

Diff: Easy

Objective: LO 5-4

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• Which of the following is an illustration of liability to clients under common law?

 

1. Client sues auditor for not discovering a theft of assets by an employee.
2. Bank sues auditor for not discovering that borrower’s financial statements are misstated.

 

1. Combined group of stockholders sue auditor for not discovering materially misstated financial statements.

 

1. Federal government prosecutes auditor for knowingly issuing an incorrect audit report. Answer: B

 

Terms: Liability to clients under common law

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-4

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• Which of the following is an illustration of liability under the federal securities acts? A) Client sues auditor for not discovering a theft of assets by an employee.

 

1. B) Bank sues auditor for not discovering that borrower’s financial statements are misstated.

 

1. C) Combined group of stockholders sue auditor for not discovering materially misstated financial statements.

 

1. D) auditor sues client for not cooperating during engagement. Answer: C

 

Terms: Liability under federal securities acts

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-4

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• A CPA firm normally uses one or a combination of four defenses when there are legal claims by clients. Which one of the following is generally not a defense?

 

1. A) Lack of duty

 

1. B) Non -negligent performance C) Contributory negligence D) Foreseeable users Answer: D

 

Terms: Defenses when there are legal claims

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-4

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

 

 

 

14

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

• The legal term for when an auditor issues an opinion of an audit, knowing that an adequate audit was not performed is called?

 

1. A) breach of contract

 

1. B) tort action for negligence C) constructive fraud

 

1. D) fraud Answer: C

 

Te rms: Failure of party to meet its obligations, causing injury to another party

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-4

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• Tort actions against CPAs are more common than breach of contract actions because:

1. there are more torts than contracts.
2. the burden of proof is on the auditor rather than on the person suing.
3. the person suing need prove only negligence.
4. the amounts recoverable are normally larger.

Answer: D

 

Terms: Tort actions against CPAs are more common than breach of contract

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-4

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• The principal issue to be resolved in cases involving alleged negligence is usually: A) the amount of the damages suffered by plaintiff.

 

1. B) whether to impose punitive damages on defendant. C) the level of care exercised by the CPA.

 

1. D) whether defendant was involved in fraud. Answer: C

 

Terms: Principal issue to be resolved in cases involving alleged negligence

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-4

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• In the auditing environment, failure to meet auditing standards is often:

1. an accepted practice.
2. a suggestion of negligence.
3. conclusive evidence of negligence.

 

1. tantamount to criminal behavior. Answer: C

 

Terms: Failure to meet auditing standards

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-4

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

• A common way for a CPA firm to demonstrate its lack of duty to perform is by use of a(n): A) expert witness’ testimony.

 

1. B) audit contract, or engagement letter. C) management representation letter. D) confirmation letter.

 

Answer: B

 

Terms: Common way to demonstrate lack of duty to perform

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-4

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• To succeed in an action against the auditor, the client must be able to show that:

 

1. the auditor was fraudulent.
2. the auditor was grossly negligent.
3. there was a written contract.

 

1. there is a close causal connection between the auditor’s behavior and the damages suffered by the client.

 

Answer: D

 

Terms: To succeed in an action against the auditor, client must show that

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-4

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• Matthews & Co., CPAs, issued an unqualified opinion on Dodgers Corporation. Millennium Bank, which relied on the audited financial statements, granted a loan of $200,00,000 to Dodgers Corporation. Dodgers subsequently defaulted on the loan. To succeed in an action against Matthews & Co., Millennium Bank must prove that the bank was:

 

1. A) in privity of contract with Dodgers. B) in privity of contract with Millennium. C) free from contributory negligence.

 

1. D) justified in relying on the financial statements in granting the loan. Answer: D

 

Terms: Legal action where bank relied audited financial statements, granted loan on which customer defaulted

Diff: Challenging

Objective: LO 5-4

AACSB: Analytic skills

 

• The preferred defense in third-party suits is:

 

1. lack of duty to perform.
2. non-negligent performance.
3. absence of causal connection.
4. client fraud.

 

Answer: B

 

Terms: Preferred defense in third-party suits

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-4

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

• One of the changes in auditing procedure which was brought about as a result of the 1136 Tenants case was that auditors were encouraged to begin using:

 

1. A) letters of representation. B) confirmation letters.

 

1. C) engagement letters. D) billet doux letters. Answer: C

 

Terms: Audit procedure brought about by 1136 Tenants case

Diff: Challenging

Objective: LO 5-4

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• The King Surety Company wrote a general fidelity bond covering thefts of assets by the employees of Wilson, Inc. Thereafter, Cooney, an employee of Wilson, embezzled $17,200 of company funds. When the activities were discovered, King paid Wilson the full amount in accordance with the terms of the fidelity bond, and then sought recovery against Wilson’s auditors, Lynch & Merritt, CPAs. Which of the following would be Lynch & Merritt’s best defense?

 

1. A) King is not in privity of contract.

 

1. B) The shortages were the result of clever forgeries and collusive fraud which would not be detected by an examination made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.

 

1. C) Lynch & Merritt were not guilty either of gross negligence or fraud.

 

1. D) Lynch & Merritt were not aware of the King-Wilson surety relationship. Answer: B

 

Terms: Defense in recovery against auditors with employee theft

Diff: Challenging

Objective: LO 5-4

AACSB: Analytic skills

 

• There are four major sources of an auditor’s legal liability. One source is liability to the audit client. List the other three sources.

 

Answer: The other three sources of auditor’s legal liability are:

• Liability to third parties under common law.
• Civil liability under federal securities law s.
• Criminal liability.

 

Terms: Sources of auditor’s legal liability

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-4

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

• Discuss each of the four defenses a CPA firm can normally use when facing legal claims by clients. Which of these defenses is ordinarily not available against third-party suits?

 

Answer: Lack of duty. The CPA firm claims that there was no implied or expressed contract.

 

Non–negligent performance. The CPA firm claims that the audit was performed in accordance with a uditing standards.

 

Contributory negligence. The CPA firm claims that the client’s own actions resulted in the loss that is the basis for the damages, or interfered with the conduct of the audit in such a way that prevented that auditor from discovering the cause of the loss. This defense is not available in third-party suits.

 

Absence of causal connection. The CPA firm claims that the auditor’s failure to follow auditing standards did not cause the damages suffered by the client.

 

Terms: Four defenses a CPA firm can normally use when facing legal claims by clients

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-4

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• An example of auditor legal liability to third parties under common law would be the federal government prosecuting an auditor for knowingly issuing an incorrect audit report.

 

1. A) True B) False Answer: B

 

Terms: Legal liability to third parties under common law

 

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-4

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• The 1136 Tenants case was a criminal case concerning a CPA’s failure to uncover fraud during a financial statement audit.

 

1. A) True B) False Answer: B

 

Terms: 1136 Tenants case

 

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-4

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• The preferred defense in third-party suits is absence of causal connection.

1. True
2. False

Answer: B

 

Terms: Preferred defense in third-party suits; Absence of causal connection

Diff: Challenging

 

Objective: LO 5-4

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

Learning Objective 5-5

 

• A financial institution sues the audit firm for failure to discover that a borrower’s financial statements are materially misstated. This is an example of which of the following legal liability concepts?

 

1. A) Liability to clients
2. Liability to 3^rd parties under common law
3. Civil liability under federal securities law

 

1. Criminal liability

Answer: B

 

Terms: Legal liability in audit of financial statements that are materially misstated

Diff: Easy

Objective: LO 5-5

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• Which of the following auditor’s defenses usually means non-reliance on the financial statements by the user?

 

1. A) Lack of duty

 

1. B) Non -negligent performance C) Absence of causal connections D) Contributory negligence

 

Answer: C

 

Terms: Auditor defenses which means non-reliance on the financial statements

Diff: Easy

Objective: LO 5-5

AACSB: Analytic skills

 

• A group typically included as “third parties” in common law is:

 

A)

 

Actual and potential stockholders	Employees of client
Yes	Yes
B)
Actual and potential stockholders	Employees of client
No	No
C)
Actual and potential stockholders	Employees of client
Yes	No
D)
Actual and potential stockholders	Employees of client
No	Yes

 

Answer: A

 

Terms: Third-parties in common law

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-5

 

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

 

19

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

4) The major conclusion of the 1931 Ultramares case was that:

 

1. ordinary negligence is insufficient for liability to third parties.
2. ordinary negligence is sufficient for liability to third-party beneficiaries.
3. fraud or gross negligence is sufficient for liability to third parties.
4. auditors have no liabilities to third parties.

 

Answer: A

 

Terms: Major conclusion of 1931 Ultramares case

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-5

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• Under common law, a foreseen user would be treated the same as: A)

 

A primary beneficiary	A known third party
Yes	Yes
B)
A primary beneficiary	A known third party
No	No
C)
A primary beneficiary	A known third party
Yes	No
D)
A primary beneficiary	A known third party
No	Yes

 

Answer: A

 

Terms: Foreseen user under common law treated the same as

Diff: Moderate

 

Objective: LO 5-5

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• A broad interpretation of the rights of third-party beneficiaries holds that users that the auditor should have been able to foresee as being likely users of financial statements have the same rights as those with privity of contract. This is known as the concept of:

 

1. A) foreseen users. B) foreseeable users.

 

1. C) expected users.
2. D) four-party contracts.

Answer: B

 

Terms: Rights of third-party beneficiaries; Privity of contract

Diff: Moderate

 

Objective: LO 5-5

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

• Which of the auditor’s defenses is ordinarily not available when lawsuits are filed by a third party? A) Absence of causal connections

 

1. B) Contributory negligence

 

1. C) Non-negligent performance D) Lack of duty

 

Answer: B

 

Terms: Auditor defenses not available when lawsuits filed by a third party

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-5

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• According to the principle established by the Restatement of Torts case, foreseen users must be members of:

 

1. A) any potential user group. B) a legally protected class.

 

1. C) a reasonably limited and identifiable user group. D) a reasonably limited and established user group. Answer: C

 

Terms: Principle established by Restatement of Torts; Foreseen users must be members

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-5

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• In an action against a CPA in a jurisdiction that follows the Ultramares doctrine, lack of privity is a viable defense provided the plaintiff:

 

1. A) is the client’s creditor who sued the CPA for negligence. B) can prove gross negligence.

 

1933. C) violated the Securities Act of 1933. D) violated the Securities Act of 1934. Answer: A

 

Terms: Ultramares doctrine; Lack of privity is viable defense

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-5

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• Under common law, an individual or company that (1) does not have a contract with an auditor, (2) is known by the auditor in advance of the audit, and (3) will use the auditor’s report to make decisions about the client company has:

 

1. A) no rights unless an auditor is grossly negligent. B) no rights unless an auditor is fraudulent.

 

1. C) no rights against an auditor.
2. D) the same rights against an auditor as a client.

Answer: D

 

Terms: Common law third-party rights

Diff: Challenging

Objective: LO 5-5

AACSB: Analytic skills

 

 

 

 

 

21

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

• The basic legal concept which was affirmed in the 1985 New York case, Credit All iance, was that: A) the auditor’s defense of privity of contract is still valid against third parties.

 

1. B) the auditor is liable for ordinary negligence to specifically foreseen third parties. C) the auditor is liable for ordinary negligence to reasonably foreseeable third parties. D) the auditor’s defense of contributory negligence is no longer valid.

 

Answer: A

 

Terms: Basic legal concept affirmed in 1985 case, Credit Alliance

Diff: Challenging

Objective: LO 5-5

AACSB: Analytic skills

 

• The partnership of Booth & Haynes, CPAs, has been engaged to examine the financial statements of Paul, Inc., in connection with the registration of Paul’s securities with the Securities and Exchange

 

Commission. Under these circumstances, which of the following statements is true?

 

1. A) Booth & Haynes is assuming much greater third-party liability than it assumes on engagements under common law.

 

1. B) If its examination is not fraudulent, Booth & Haynes may issue an appropriate disclaimer to the financial statements and thereby avoid liability.

 

1. C) Booth & Haynes must incorporate if they wish to practice before the SEC.

 

1. D) Booth & Haynes must be a large interstate firm if they wish to practice before the SEC. Answer: A

 

Terms: CPAs engaged to examine financial statements in connection with registration of securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission

 

Diff: Challenging

Objective: LO 5-5

 

AACSB: Analytic skills

 

• As a consequence of his failure to adhere to generally accepted auditing standards in the course of his examination of the Lamp Corp., Harrison, CPA, did not detect the embezzlement of a material amount of funds by the company’s controller. As a matter of common law, to what extent would Harrison be liable to the Lamp Corp. for losses attributable to the theft?

 

1. A) He would have no liability, since the ordinary examination cannot be relied upon to detect thefts of assets by employees.

 

1. B) He would have no liability because privity of contract is lacking. C) He would be liable for losses attributable to his negligence.

 

1. D) He would be liable only if it could be proven that he was grossly negligent. Answer: C

 

Terms: Under common law, extent of liability where auditor failed to adhere to generally accepted auditing standards in examination of client and failed to detect employee embezzlement

 

Diff: Challenging

Objective: LO 5-5

 

AACSB: Analytic skills

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

22

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

• Three approaches to the application of the foreseen users’ concept are (1) the C redit Alliance approach,

 

(2) the restatement of torts approach, and (3) the foreseeable user approach. Summarize each of these three approaches.

 

Answer: The Credit Alliance approach upholds the concept of privity of contract established by the

 

Ultramares Corporation v. Touche case. Under this approach, for an auditor to be liable to third parties, the auditor (1) must know and intend that the work product would be used by the third -party for a specific purpose, and (2) the knowledge and intent must be evidenced by the auditor’s conduct.

 

Under the restatement of torts approach, foreseen users must be members of a reasonably limited and identifiable group of users that have relied on the CPA’s work, such as creditors, even though those persons were not specifically known to the CPA at the time the work was done.

 

Under the foreseeable user approach, any users that the auditor should have reasonably been able to foresee as likely users of the client’s financial statements have the same rights as those with privity of contract.

 

Terms: Three approaches to the application of foreseen users’ concepts; Credit Alliance approach; Restatement of

torts approach; foreseeable user approach

Diff: Challenging

Objective: LO 5-5

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• Of the three approaches to applying the concept of foreseen users (C redit Alliance approach, restatement of torts approach, and foreseeable user approach), the approach followed by the most states is the Credit Alliance

 

1. A) True B) False Answer: B

 

Terms: Credit Alliance approach; Restatement of torts approach; Foreseeable user approach

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-5

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• The restatement of torts approach to the concept of foreseen users states that any users that the auditor should have reasonably been able to foresee as being likely users of financial statements have the same rights as those with privity of contract.

 

1. A) True B) False Answer: B

 

Terms: Restatement of torts approach; Foreseen users; Privity of contract

 

Diff: Challenging

Objective: LO 5-5

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

• The C redit Alliance approach to the concept of foreseen users states that to be liable to third parties, an auditor (1) must know and intend that the work product would be used by the third -party for a specific purpose, and (2) the knowledge and intent must be evidenced by the auditor’s conduct.

 

1. A) True B) False Answer: A

 

Terms: Credit Alliance approach; Foreseen users; Liability to third parties

Diff: Challenging

Objective: LO 5-5

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

Learning Objective 5-6

 

• Which of the following required an adequate system of internal control for SEC registrants? A) Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

1. B) Securities Act of 1933

 

1. C) Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 D) Securities Act of 1934

 

Answer: C

 

Terms: Required an adequate system of internal control for SEC registrants

Diff: Easy

Objective: LO 5-6

 

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

24

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

• The increased litigation under the federal securities laws has resulted from: A)

 

	The strict liability standards
The availability of class-action	imposed on CPAs by the
litigation	securities laws	An excess of attorneys
Yes	Yes	Yes
B)
	The strict liability standards
The availability of class-action	imposed on CPAs by the
litigation	securities laws	An excess of attorneys
Yes	No	No
C)
	The strict liability standards
The availability of class-action	imposed on CPAs by the
litigation	securities laws	An excess of attorneys
Yes	Yes	No
D)
	The strict liability standards
The availability of class-action	imposed on CPAs by the
litigation	securities laws	An excess of attorneys
No	No	No

 

Answer: C

 

Terms: Increased litigation under federal securities law resulted from

Diff: Moderate

 

Objective: LO 5-6

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• Under the Securities Act of 1933, the auditor’s responsibility for making sure the financial statements were fairly stated extends to:

 

1. A) the date of the financial statements.

 

1. B) the date the registration statement becomes effective. C) the date of the audit report.

 

1. D) one year beyond the date of the financial statements. Answer: B

 

Terms: Securities Act of 1933; Auditor responsibility for making sure financial statements were fairly stated extends

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-6

 

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

• Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which type of organization is required to submit audited

financial statements to the SEC?

 

1. A) Every company with securities traded on national and over -the-counter exchanges. B) Every corporation.

 

1. C) Every company issuing new securities.

 

1. D) Every corporation which is chartered by a state government. Answer: A

 

Terms: Securities Act of 1934; Organizations required to submit audited financial statements

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-6

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• The Securities and Exchange Commission can impose all but which of the following sanctions?

1. Suspend a CPA from auditing SEC clients.
2. Prohibit a CPA from accepting new SEC clients for a period of time.
3. Require a CPA to participate in continuing-education programs and make changes in their practice.
4. Revoke a CPA license.

Answer: D

 

Terms: Securities and Exchange Commission can impose sanctions

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-6

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

6) The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) of 1977:

 

1. requires auditors to review and evaluate systems of internal control as a part of an audit.

 

1. requires SEC registrants to maintain a reasonably complete and accurate set of records and an adequate system of internal control.

 

1. requires auditors to review client’s internal control system in a manner which is thorough enough to judge whether client meets the requirements of the FCPA.

 

1. requires auditors to file a report with the SEC if client’s internal control system is inadequate. Answer: B

 

Terms: Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-6

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• While the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 remains in effect, its internal control provisions have

 

been largely superseded by which of the following? A) The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

1. B) The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act C) Th e Federal False Statements Statute

 

1. D) The Federal Mail Fraud Statute Answer: A

 

Terms: Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977; Internal control provisions

 

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-6

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

Topic: SOX

 

 

 

 

26

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

• Which of the following is not likely a factor in the increase in the number of lawsuits and sizes of awards to plaintiffs related to auditor behavior?

 

1. A) Increased awareness of auditor responsibilities by users of financial statements. B) CPA firms are more willing to settle lawsuits.

 

1. C) Difficulty judges and jurors have in understanding legal matters.

 

1. D) Increased consciousness on the part of the SEC for its responsibility to protect investors. Answer: C

 

Terms: Factor in increase in number of lawsuits and sizes of awards

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-6

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• A major purpose of federal securities regulations is to:

 

1. provide sufficient reliable information to the investing public who purchase securities in the marketplace.

 

1. establish the qualifications for accountants who are members of the profession.

 

1. eliminate incompetent attorneys and accountants who participate in the registration of securities to be offered to the public.

 

1. provide a set of uniform standards and tests for accountants, attorneys, and others who practice before the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Answer: A

 

Terms: Major purpose of federal securities regulations

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-6

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• The leading precedent-setting auditing case in third-party liability is: A) Escott et al. v. Bar Ch ris Construction Corp.

 

1. B) Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst.

 

1. C) Ultramares Corporation v. Touche. D) United States v. Simon.

 

Answer: C

 

Terms: Leading precedent-setting auditing case in third-party liability

Diff: Challenging

Objective: LO 5-6

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• Which of the following statements about the Securities Act of 1933 is not true?

 

1. A third-party that purchased securities described in the registration statement may sue the auditor for material misrepresentations or omissions in the audited financial statements.

 

1. A third-party user does not have the burden of proof that he/she relied on the financial statements.

 

1. A third-party user has the burden of proof that the auditor was either negligent or fraudulent in doing the audit.

 

1. A third-party user does not have the burden of proof that the loss was caused by the misleading statements.

 

Answer: C

 

Terms: Securities Act of 1933

Diff: Challenging

 

Objective: LO 5-6

AACSB: Analytic skills

 

 

27

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

• The most significant audit issue that came as a result of the court decision in the Escott et al. v. Bar Chris Construction Corporation case in 1968 was:

 

1. A) the court’s reaffirmation that the burden of proof was on the plaintiff to prove the auditor was

negligent.

 

1. B) the affirmation of the increased auditor’s responsibility when performing an S -1 review, a review of events subsequent to the balance sheet, for registration statements.

 

1. C) the increased auditor responsibility when associated with unaudited financial statements. D) the court’s refusal to allow the percentage-of-completion method of accounting for revenues. Answer: B

 

Terms: Significant audit issue from Escott et al v. Bar Chris Construction Corporation case in 1968

Diff: Challenging

Objective: LO 5-6

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• Under the federal securities acts, one significant result occurring directly due to the Escott et al. v. Bar Chris Construction Corporation case was that SAS was changed to require:

 

1. A) greater emphasis on subsequent events procedures.
2. B) new standards for unaudited statements.
3. C) a broader definition of third-party beneficiaries.

 

1. D) more companies to file annual reports with the SEC. Answer: A

 

Terms: Significant result from Escott et al v. Bar Chris Construction Corporation case

Diff: Challenging

Objective: LO 5-6

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, most of the litigation against the auditor has been

 

generated because of the auditor’s involvement with the: A) 8-K form.

 

1. B) 10-K form. C) 10-Q form. D) S -1 form.

 

Answer: B

 

Terms: Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

Diff: Challenging

Objective: LO 5-6

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• Section 10 and Rule 10b -5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are often referred to as:

1. the antifraud provisions.
2. the new issues provisions.
3. the full-employment act for accountants.
4. the RICO provisions.

Answer: A

 

Terms: Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Section 10 and Rule 10b-5

 

Diff: Challenging

Objective: LO 5-6

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

 

 

 

28

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

• In a leading securities law and CPA liabilities case, the U.S. Supreme Court r uled in 1976 in Hochfelder Ernst & Ernst that before CPAs could be held liable for Rule 10b -5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, what would be required to be shown to the court was the auditor’s:

 

1. A) ordinary negligence. B) gross negligence.

 

1. C) knowledge and intent to deceive.
2. D) financial gain at the expense of the plaintiff.

Answer: C

 

Terms: Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 10b-5; U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1976 in Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst

Diff: Challenging

Objective: LO 5-6

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 makes it felony to destroy or create documents to impede or obstruct a federal investigation. Those provisions were adopted following which of the following legal cases?

 

1. A) United States v. Natelli B) United States v. Andersen

 

1. C) ESM Government Securities v. Alexander Grant & Co. D) United States v. Simon

 

Answer: B

 

Terms: Similarity between United States v. Natelli case (i.e ., the National Student Marketing case of 1975), and the ESM Government Securities v. Alexander Grant & Co. case of 1986

Diff: Challenging

Objective: LO 5-6

 

AACSB: Analytic skills

 

• The Securities and Exchange Commission has authority to:

 

1. prescribe specific auditing procedures to detect fraud concerning inventories and accounts receivable of companies engaged in interstate commerce.

 

1. deny lack of privity as a defense in third-party actions for gross negligence against the auditors of public companies.

 

1. determine accounting principles for the purpose of financial reporting by companies offering securities to the public.

 

1. require a change of auditors of governmental entities after a given period of years as a means of ensuring auditor independence.

 

Answer: C

 

Terms: Securities and Exchange Commission authority

Diff: Challenging

Objective: LO 5-6

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

29

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

19) Discuss the sanctions the Securities and Exchange Commission can impose on auditors.

 

Answer: The SEC has the power in certain circumstances to sanction or suspend practitioners from doing audits for SEC companies. The SEC’s Rules of Practice permit them to temporarily or permanently deny a CPA or CPA firm from being associated with financial statements of public companies, either because of lack of appropriate qualifications or having engaged in unethical or improper professional conduct.

 

Terms: Sanctions the Securities and Exchange Commission can impose on auditors

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-6

 

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• One result from the Escott et al. v. Bar Ch ris case was a greater emphasis being placed on audit staff understanding the client’s business and industry.

 

1. A) True B) False Answer: A

 

Terms: Result from Escott et al. v. Bar Chris

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-6

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• The only parties who can recover from auditors under the Securities Act of 1933 are original purchasers of securities.

 

1. A) True B) False Answer: A

 

Terms: Securities Act of 1933

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-6

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• Under the Securities Act of 1933, a third-party plaintiff does not have the burden of proof that he or she relied on the financial statements or that the auditor was negligent or fraudulent in doing the audit. Rather, the plaintiff need only prove that the audited financial statements contained a material misrepresentation or omission.

 

1. A) True B) False Answer: A

 

Terms: Securities Act of 1933; Burden of proof

 

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-6

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

 

• Companies with securities traded on national and audited financial statements once every three years to A) True

 

1. B) False Answer: B

 

 

 

 

over -the-counter exchanges are required to submit the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

 

Terms: Securities Act Commission; Securities traded on national exchanges

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-6

 

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• The same three defenses available to auditors in common lawsuits by third parties -non-negligent performance, lack of duty, and absence of causal connection –are also available for suits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

1. A) True B) False Answer: A

 

Terms: Securities Act of 1934; Defenses available to auditors in common law suits by third parties

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-6

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• The United States Supreme Court has ruled that outside professionals such as accountants who don’t help run corrupt businesses cannot be sued under the provisions of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. A) True

 

1. B) False Answer: B

 

Terms: United States Supreme Court; Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-6

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 allows an injured party to seek treble (triple) damages and recovery of legal fees in cases where it can be demonstrated that the defendant was engaged in a pattern of fraudulent activity.

 

1. A) True B) False Answer: B

 

Terms: Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977

 

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-6

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

Learning Objective 5-7

 

• In which case were auditors prosecuted for filing false financial statements for a client with the government?

 

1. A) 1136 Tenants case
2. B) United States v. Simon case

 

1. C) Escott et al. v. Bar Chris case, aka Bar Chris D) Ultramares Corporation v. Touche case Answer: B

 

Terms: Case where auditors were prosecuted for filing false financial statements

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-7

 

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• A CPA is subject to criminal liability if the CPA:

 

1. refuses to turn over requested audit documentation to a client.
2. performs an audit in a negligent manner.
3. willfully omits a material fact from a set of financial statements.
4. willfully breaches a contract with a client.

 

Answer: C

 

Terms: CPA subject to criminal liability

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-7

 

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

3) Which of the following best describes a trend in litigation involving CPAs?

 

1. A CPA cannot render an opinion unless the CPA has audited all affiliates of a company.
2. A CPA may not successfully assert that the CPA had no motive to be part of a fraud.
3. A CPA may be exposed to criminal as well as civil liability.
4. A CPA is primarily responsible for a client’s footnotes filed with the SEC.

Answer: C

 

Terms: Trend in litigation involving CPAs

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-7

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

• CPAs can be held liable for criminal activity under both state and federal laws. Infamous cases have involved United States vs. Natelli and ESM Government Securities v. Alexander Grant and Co. Discuss what occurred and prepare a summary of the court findings.

 

Answer: Natelli–two auditors were convicted of criminal liability under the 1934 act for certifying financial statements of National Student Marketing Corporation that contained inadequate disclosures.

 

ESM–management revealed to the partner in charge of the audit of ESM that the previous year’s financial statements contained a material misstatement. Rather than complying with the profession and firm standards, the partner agreed to say nothing in the hope that management would work its way out of the problem during the current year. The partner was convicted of criminal charges for his role in sustaining the fraud

 

Terms: CPAs held liable for criminal activity and federal laws; Infamous cases

Diff: Moderate

 

Objective: LO 5-7

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 makes destruction of audit documentation punishable by up to 10 years in prison.

 

1. A) True B) False

 

Answer: B

 

Terms: Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; Destruction of audit documentation punishable

Diff: Challenging

Objective: LO 5-7

 

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

Topic: SOX

 

Learning Objective 5-8

 

• Which of the following resulted in a federal law passed in 1995 that significantly reduced potential damages in securities-related litigation?

 

1. A) Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
2. B) Public Securities Damages and Settlements Act

 

1. C) Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act D) U.S. Securities Claims Reform Act

 

Answer: A

 

Terms: Federal law passé in 1995 significantly reduced potential damages

 

Diff: Challenging

Objective: LO 5-8

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

33

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

• The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 reduced potential damages in securities -related litigation, but because the act applied only to federal courts, attorneys began taking cases to state courts. Which of the following eliminated this loophole?

 

1. A) Private Securities Litigation Reform Amendment B) Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 C) Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act D) U.S. Securities Claims Reform Act

 

Answer: B

 

Terms: Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995; Eliminated loophole

Diff: Challenging

Objective: LO 5-8

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• Discuss at least 3 steps the AICPA and the accounting profession as a whole can and are taking to reduce the practitioner’s exposure to lawsuits.

 

Answer: Steps the profession is taking to reduce practitioners’ exposure to lawsuits include:

• Improve auditing to better meet users’ needs
• Standard and rule setting and revisions to meet the changing needs of auditing.
• Oppose lawsuits.

 

• Educate investors and other users of financial statements as to the meaning of the opinion of the auditors and the nature of the auditor’s work.

 

• Sanction members for improper conduct and performance.
• Lobby for changes in laws.
• Educate users about the limits of auditing.

 

Terms: Steps the AICPA and accounting profession taking to reduce practitioner’s exposure to lawsuits

Diff: Moderate

Objective: LO 5-8

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

34

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

4) Match eight of the following terms (a-n) with the definitions provided below (1-8):

 

1. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
2. Securities Exchange Act of 1934
3. Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998
4. Securities Act of 1933
5. Ultramares doctrine
6. Audit risk
7. Audit failure
8. Standards failure
9. Business failure

 

1. Absence of causal connection
2. Contributory negligence
3. Lack of duty to perform
4. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
5. Nonnegligent performance

 

________ 1. A situation in which an incorrect audit opinion is issued because it failed to comply with the requirements of auditing standards.

 

________ 2. A federal statute dealing with companies that trade securities on national and over -the-counter exchanges. Auditors are involved because the annual reporting requirements include audited financial statements.

 

________ 3. An auditor’s legal defense under which the auditor claims that the client’s own actions either resulted in the loss that is the basis for damages or interfered with the conduct of the audit in such a way that prevented the auditor from discovering the cause of the loss.

 

________ 4. A federal statute that makes it illegal to offer a bribe to an official of a foreign country.

 

________ 5. A common-law approach to third-party liability in which ordinary negligence is insufficient for liability to third parties, because of the lack of privity of contract between the third -party and the auditor unless the third-party is a primary beneficiary.

 

________ 6. A federal statute designed to significantly reduce the potential damages in federal securities – related litigation by providing for proportionate liability in most cases.

 

________ 7. An auditor’s legal defense under which the auditor claims that the audit was performed in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.

 

________ 8. An auditor’s legal defense under which the auditor claims that the failure to follow audi ting standards did not cause the damages suffered by the client.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35

 

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

 

^ToTo ^downloaddownload ^moremore ^ebooks,ebooks, ^slides,slides, ^SMSM ^andand ^TBTB ^visit:visit: http://testbanklancerhtp:/testbanklancer^..^blogspotblogspot^..^comcom

 

 

 

 

 

Answer:

 

1. g
2. b
3. k
4. a
5. e
6. c
7. n
8. j

 

Terms: Audit failure; Securities Exchange Act of 1934; Contributory negligence; Foreign Corrupt Practices Act;

Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998; Ultramares doctrine; Nonnegligent performance; Absence of

causal connection

Diff: Moderate

 

Objective: LO 5-2, LO 5-5, LO 5-5, LO 5-6 and LO 5-8

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• Discuss some of the steps individual practicing auditors can take to minimize their legal liability. Answer: There are many steps individual practitioners can take to minimize legal liability including:

 

• Deal only with clients possessing integrity.
• Hire qualified personnel and train and supervise t hem properly.
• Follow the standards of the profession.
• Maintain independence.
• Understand the client’s business.
• Perform quality audits.
• Document the work properly.
• Obtain an engagement letter and a representation letter.
• Maintain confidential relations.
• Carry adequate insurance.
• Consult with experienced legal counsel.
• Choose a form of organization that provides some form of legal liability protection to owners.
• Exercise professional skepticism.

 

Terms: Steps auditors can take to minimize legal liability

Diff: Easy

Objective: LO 5-3 and LO 5-8

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills

 

• The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 capped damage awards against auditors to the amount of the audit fees charged.

 

1. A) True B) False Answer: B

 

Terms: Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

Diff: Easy

Objective: LO 5-8

AACSB: Reflective thinking skills