Subtotal: $980.00

Principles of Microeconomics 8th Edition by N. Gregory Mankiw - Test Bank

Principles of Microeconomics 8th Edition by N. Gregory Mankiw - Test Bank   Instant Download - Complete Test Bank With Answers     Sample Questions Are Posted Below   1. People who provide you with goods and services   a. are acting out of generosity.   b. do so because they get something in return.   …

$19.99

Principles of Microeconomics 8th Edition by N. Gregory Mankiw – Test Bank

 

Instant Download – Complete Test Bank With Answers

 

 

Sample Questions Are Posted Below

 

1. People who provide you with goods and services

  a. are acting out of generosity.
  b. do so because they get something in return.
  c. have chosen not to become interdependent.
  d. are required to do so by the government.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Easy
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.012 – Apply basic, economic principles of individual decision making that determine how an economy generally works.
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Knowledge
CUSTOM ID:   001.03.0 – MC – MANK08

 

2. When an economist points out that you and millions of other people are interdependent, he or she is referring to the fact that we all

  a. rely upon the government to provide us with the basic necessities of life.
  b. rely upon one another for the goods and services we consume.
  c. have similar tastes and abilities.
  d. are concerned about one another’s well-being.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Easy
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.012 – Apply basic, economic principles of individual decision making that determine how an economy generally works.
TOPICS:   Economic thinking
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Knowledge
CUSTOM ID:   002.03.0 – MC – MANK08

 

1. Which of the following is not a reason people choose to depend on others for goods and services?

  a. to improve their lives
  b. to allow them to enjoy a greater variety of goods and services
  c. to consume more of each good without working any more hours
  d. to allow people to produce outside their production possibilities frontiers

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   International trade
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   001.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

2. When can two countries gain from trading two goods?

  a. when the first country can only produce the first good and the second country can only produce the second good
  b. when the first country can produce both goods, but can only produce the second good at great cost, and the second country can produce both goods, but can only produce the first good at great cost
  c. when the first country is better at producing both goods and the second country is worse at producing both goods
  d. Two countries could gain from trading two goods under all of the above conditions.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   International trade
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   002.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

3. Tom produces baseball gloves and baseball bats. Steve also produces baseball gloves and baseball bats, but Tom is better at producing both goods. In this case, trade could

  a. benefit both Steve and Tom.
  b. benefit Steve, but not Tom.
  c. benefit Tom, but not Steve.
  d. benefit neither Steve nor Tom.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   International trade
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   003.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

4. Olivia bakes cakes and Andrew grows corn. Olivia and Andrew both like to eat cake and eat corn. In which of the following cases is it impossible for both Olivia and Andrew to benefit from trade?

  a. Olivia cannot grow corn and Andrew cannot bake cakes.
  b. Olivia is better than Andrew at baking cakes and Andrew is better than Olivia at growing corn.
  c. Olivia is better than Andrew at baking cakes and at growing corn.
  d. Both Olivia and Andrew can benefit from trade in all of the above cases.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   International trade
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   004.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

5. Abby bakes brownies and Liam grows flowers. In which of the following cases is it impossible for both Abby and Liam to benefit from trade?

  a. Abby does not like flowers and Liam does not like brownies.
  b. Abby is better than Liam at baking brownies and Liam is better than Abby at growing flowers.
  c. Liam is better than Abby at baking brownies and at growing flowers.
  d. Both Abby and Liam can benefit from trade in all of the above cases.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   International trade
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   005.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

6. The production possibilities frontier illustrates

  a. the combinations of output that an economy should produce.
  b. the combinations of output that an economy should consume.
  c. the combinations of output that an economy can produce.
  d. All of the above are correct.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.037 – Construct a production possibilities frontier.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   006.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

7. An economy’s production possibilities frontier is also its consumption possibilities frontier

  a. under all circumstances.
  b. under no circumstances.
  c. when the economy is self-sufficient.
  d. when the rate of tradeoff between the two goods being produced is constant.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.037 – Construct a production possibilities frontier.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   007.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

8. A production possibilities frontier is bowed outward when

  a. the more resources the economy uses to produce one good, the fewer resources it has available to produce the other good.
  b. an economy is self-sufficient instead of interdependent and engaged in trade.
  c. the rate of tradeoff between the two goods being produced is constant.
  d. the rate of tradeoff between the two goods being produced depends on how much of each good is being produced.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.144 – Explain why the slope of a production possibilities frontier is not constant.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Tradeoffs
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   008.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

9. A production possibilities frontier is a straight line when

  a. the more resources the economy uses to produce one good, the fewer resources it has available to produce the other good.
  b. an economy is interdependent and engaged in trade instead of self-sufficient.
  c. the rate of tradeoff between the two goods being produced is constant.
  d. the rate of tradeoff between the two goods being produced depends on how much of each good is being produced.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.037 – Construct a production possibilities frontier.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Tradeoffs
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   009.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

10. Consider two individuals — Marquis and Serena — each of whom would like to wear sweaters and eat tasty food. The gains from trade between Marquis and Serena are most obvious in which of the following cases?

  a. Marquis is very good at knitting sweaters and at cooking tasty food, but Serena’s skills in both of these activities are very poor.
  b. Marquis and Serena both are very good at cooking tasty food, but neither has the necessary skills to knit a sweater.
  c. Marquis’s cooking and knitting skills are very poor, and Serena’s cooking and knitting skills are also very poor.
  d. Marquis’s skills are such that he can produce only sweaters, and Serena’s skills are such that she can produce only tasty food.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   International trade
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   010.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

11. Consider two individuals — Howard and Mai — each of whom would like to wear sweaters and eat tasty food. The gains from trade between Howard and Mai are least obvious in which of the following cases?

  a. Howard is very good at knitting sweaters and at cooking tasty food, but Mai’s skills in both of these activities are very poor.
  b. Howard is very good at knitting sweaters and at cooking tasty food; Mai is very good at knitting sweaters, but she knows nothing about cooking tasty food.
  c. Howard’s skills in knitting sweaters are fairly good, but his skills in cooking tasty food are fairly bad; Mai’s skills in knitting sweaters are fairly bad, but her skills in cooking tasty food are fairly good.
  d. Howard’s skills are such that he can produce only sweaters, and Mai’s skills are such that she can produce only tasty food.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   International trade
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   011.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

12. A professor spends 10 hours per day giving lectures and writing papers. For the professor, a graph that shows his various possible mixes of output (lectures given per day and papers written per day) is called his

  a. line of tastes.
  b. trade-off curve.
  c. production possibilities frontier.
  d. consumption possibilities frontier.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Easy
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Knowledge
CUSTOM ID:   012.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

13. Suppose there are only two people in the world. Each person’s production possibilities frontier also represents his or her consumption possibilities when

  a. neither person faces trade-offs.
  b. the frontiers are straight lines.
  c. the frontiers are bowed out.
  d. they choose not to trade with one another.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.037 – Construct a production possibilities frontier.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   013.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

14. The most obvious benefit of specialization and trade is that they allow us to

  a. work more hours per week than we otherwise would be able to work.
  b. consume more goods than we otherwise would be able to consume.
  c. spend more money on goods that are beneficial to society, and less money on goods that are harmful to society.
  d. consume more goods by forcing people in other countries to consume fewer goods.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Easy
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   International trade
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   014.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

15. As a student, Anne spends 40 hours per week writing term papers and completing homework assignments. On one axis of her production possibilities frontier is measured the number of term papers written per week. On the other axis is measured the number of homework assignments completed per week. Anne’s production possibilities frontier is a straight line if

  a. she faces no trade-off between writing term papers and completing homework assignments.
  b. she can switch between writing term papers and completing homework assignments at a constant rate.
  c. the rate at which she can switch between homework assignments and term papers depends on the number of homework assignments she is completing and on the number of term papers she is writing.
  d. she is required by her professors to spend half of her time on term papers and the other half of her time on homework assignments.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   015.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

16. For a self-sufficient producer, the production possibilities frontier

  a. is the same as the consumption possibilities frontier.
  b. is greater than the consumption possibilities frontier.
  c. is less than the consumption possibilities frontier.
  d. is always a straight line.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Easy
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.037 – Construct a production possibilities frontier.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Knowledge
CUSTOM ID:   016.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-1

Assume that John and Jane can switch between producing bread and wine at a constant rate.

  Labor Hours Needed
to Make
Bottle of Wine Loaf of Bread
Jane 2 1.5
John 3 1

 

17. Refer to Table 3-1. Assume that John and Jane each work 24 hours. What happens to total production if instead of each person spending 12 hours producing each good, Jane spends 21 hours producing wine and 3 hours producing bread and John spends 3 hours producing wine and 21 hours producing bread?

  a. The total production of bread and wine each rise.
  b. The total production of bread rises and the total production of wine falls.
  c. The total production of bread falls and the total production of wine rises.
  d. The total production of bread and wine each fall.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Efficiency
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   017.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-2

Assume that England and Holland can switch between producing milk and oats at a constant rate.

  Number of Units
Produced in an Hour
Milk Oats
England 10 4
Holland 8 6

 

18. Refer to Table 3-2. We could use the information in the table to draw a production possibilities frontier for England and a second production possibilities frontier for Holland. If we were to do this, measuring milk along the horizontal axis, then

  a. the slope of England’s production possibilities frontier would be -10/4 and the slope of Holland’s production possibilities frontier would be -4/3.
  b. the slope of England’s production possibilities frontier would be -4/10 and the slope of Holland’s production possibilities frontier would be -3/4.
  c. the slope of England’s production possibilities frontier would be 10/4 and the slope of Holland’s production possibilities frontier would be 4/3.
  d. the slope of England’s production possibilities frontier would be 4/10 and the slope of Holland’s production possibilities frontier would be 3/4.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   018.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-3
Production Opportunities

 

  Hours Needed to Make 1 Unit of  Number of Units Produced in 40 Hours
 Cheese  Wine  Cheese  Wine
 England  1  4  40  10
 France  5  2  8  20

 

 

19. Refer to Table 3-3. Assume that England and France each has 40 labor hours available. If each country divides its time equally between the production of cheese and wine, then total production is

  a. 8 units of cheese and 10 units of wine
  b. 24 units of cheese and 15 units of wine
  c. 40 units of cheese and 20 units of wine
  d. 48 units of cheese and 30 units of wine

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Efficiency
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   019.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

20. Refer to Table 3-3. Which of the following combinations of cheese and wine could France produce in 40 hours?

  a. 2 units of cheese and 20 units of wine
  b. 4 units of cheese and 15 units of wine
  c. 6 units of cheese and 5 units of wine
  d. 8 units of cheese and 20 units of wine

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   020.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

21. Refer to Table 3-3. Which of the following combinations of cheese and wine could England not produce in 40 hours?

  a. 12 units of cheese and 7 units of wine
  b. 16 units of cheese and 6 units of wine
  c. 20 units of cheese and 5 units of wine
  d. 26 units of cheese and 4 units of wine

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   021.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

22. Refer to Table 3-3. We could use the information in the table to draw a production possibilities frontier for England and a second production possibilities frontier for France. If we were to do this, measuring cheese along the horizontal axis, then

  a. the slope of England’s production possibilities frontier would be -4 and the slope of France’s production possibilities frontier would be -0.4.
  b. the slope of England’s production possibilities frontier would be -0.25 and the slope of France’s production possibilities frontier would be -2.5.
  c. the slope of England’s production possibilities frontier would be 0.25 and the slope of France’s production possibilities frontier would be 2.5.
  d. the slope of England’s production possibilities frontier would be 4 and the slope of France’s production possibilities frontier would be 0.4.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   022.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

23. Refer to Table 3-3. We could use the information in the table to draw a production possibilities frontier for England and a second production possibilities frontier for France. If we were to do this, measuring wine along the horizontal axis, then

  a. the slope of England’s production possibilities frontier would be -4 and the slope of France’s production possibilities frontier would be -0.4.
  b. the slope of England’s production possibilities frontier would be -0.25 and the slope of France’s production possibilities frontier would be -2.5.
  c. the slope of England’s production possibilities frontier would be 0.25 and the slope of France’s production possibilities frontier would be 2.5.
  d. the slope of England’s production possibilities frontier would be 4 and the slope of France’s production possibilities frontier would be 0.4.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   023.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-4

Assume that Andrea and Paul can switch between producing wheat and producing beef at a constant rate.

  Minutes Needed to Make 1
Bushel of Wheat Pound of Beef
Andrea 30 15
Paul 15 5

 

24. Refer to Table 3-4. Assume that Andrea and Paul each has 480 minutes available. If each person divides his time equally between the production of wheat and beef, then total production is

  a. 24 bushels of wheat and 64 pounds of beef.
  b. 21 bushels of wheat and 33 pounds of beef.
  c. 16 bushels of wheat and 48 pounds of beef.
  d. 5 bushels of wheat and 24 pounds of beef.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Efficiency
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   024.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

25. Refer to Table 3-4. Which of the following combinations of wheat and beef could Andrea produce in one 8-hour day?

  a. 16 bushels of wheat and 32 pounds of beef
  b. 9 bushels of wheat and 25 pounds of beef
  c. 7 bushels of wheat and 15 pounds of beef
  d. 10 bushels of wheat and 13 pounds of beef

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   025.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

26. Refer to Table 3-4. Which of the following combinations of wheat and beef could Paul not produce in one 8-hour day?

  a. 13 bushels of wheat and 60 pounds of beef
  b. 20 bushels of wheat and 30 pounds of beef
  c. 20 bushels of wheat and 20 pounds of beef
  d. 25 bushels of wheat and 15 pounds of beef

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   026.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-5

Assume that Aruba and Iceland can switch between producing coolers and producing radios at a constant rate.

  Labor Hours
Needed to Make 1
Cooler Radio
Aruba 2 5
Iceland 1 4

 

27. Refer to Table 3-5. Which of the following represents Aruba’s production possibilities frontier when 100 labor hours are available?

  a.
  b.
  c.
  d.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   027.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

28. Refer to Table 3-5. Which of the following represents Iceland’s production possibilities frontier when 100 labor hours are available?

  a.
  b.
  c.
  d.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   028.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

29. Refer to Table 3-5. Assume that Aruba and Iceland each has 80 labor hours available. If each country divides its time equally between the production of coolers and radios, then total production is

  a. 28 coolers and 50 radios.
  b. 30 coolers and 9 radios.
  c. 60 coolers and 18 radios.
  d. 120 coolers and 36 radios.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Efficiency
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   029.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

30. Refer to Table 3-5. Which of the following combinations of coolers and radios could Aruba produce in one 40-hour week?

  a. 3 coolers and 7 radios
  b. 5 coolers and 6 radios
  c. 11 coolers and 4 radios
  d. 13 coolers and 3 radios

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   030.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-6

Assume that Zimbabwe and Portugal can switch between producing toothbrushes and producing hairbrushes at a constant rate.

  Machine Minutes
Needed to Make 1
Toothbrush Hairbrush
Zimbabwe 3 10
Portugal 5 6

 

31. Refer to Table 3-6. Which of the following represents Zimbabwe’s and Portugal’s production possibilities frontiers when each country has 60 minutes of machine time available?

  a. Zimbabwe Portugal
  b. Zimbabwe Portugal
  c. Zimbabwe Portugal
  d. Zimbabwe Portugal

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   031.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

32. Refer to Table 3-6. Assume that Zimbabwe and Portugal each has 180 machine minutes available. If each country divides its time equally between the production of toothbrushes and hairbrushes, then total production is

  a. 24 toothbrushes and 12 hairbrushes.
  b. 48 toothbrushes and 24 hairbrushes.
  c. 96 toothbrushes and 48 hairbrushes.
  d. 720 toothbrushes and 1440 hairbrushes.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Efficiency
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   032.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

33. Refer to Table 3-6. Which of the following combinations of toothbrushes and hairbrushes could Portugal produce in 30 minutes?

  a. 1 toothbrush and 4 hairbrushes
  b. 4 toothbrushes and 2 hairbrushes
  c. 5 toothbrushes and 6 hairbrushes
  d. 6 toothbrushes and 5 hairbrushes

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   033.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

34. Refer to Table 3-6. Which of the following combinations of toothbrushes and hairbrushes could Zimbabwe not produce in 120 minutes?

  a. 5 toothbrushes and 11 hairbrushes
  b. 10 toothbrushes and 9 hairbrushes
  c. 20 toothbrushes and 6 hairbrushes
  d. 30 toothbrushes and 3 hairbrushes

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   034.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-7

Assume that the farmer and the rancher can switch between producing meat and producing potatoes at a constant rate.

  Labor Hours Needed to Make 1 Pound of Pounds Produced in 24 Hours
 Meat Potatoes Meat Potatoes
Farmer  6  4  4  6
 Rancher  3  8  8  3

 

 

 

35. Refer to Table 3-7. Assume that the farmer and the rancher each has 24 labor hours available. If each person divides his time equally between the production of meat and potatoes, then total production is

  a. 6 pounds of meat and 4.5 pounds of potatoes.
  b. 5.5 pounds of meat and 8 pounds of potatoes.
  c. 12 pounds of meat and 9 pounds of potatoes.
  d. 5 pounds of meat and 5.5 pounds of potatoes.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Efficiency
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   035.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

36. Refer to Table 3-7. Which of the following combinations of meat and potatoes could the farmer produce in 24 hours?

  a. 1 pound of meat and 8 pounds of potatoes.
  b. 2 pounds of meat and 2 pounds of potatoes.
  c. 1 pounds of meat and 5 pounds of potatoes.
  d. 3 pounds of meat and 2 pounds of potatoes.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   036.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

37. Refer to Table 3-7. Which of the following combinations of meat and potatoes could the rancher not produce in 24 hours?

  a. 5 pounds of meat and 1 pounds of potatoes.
  b. 2 pounds of meat and 2 pounds of potatoes.
  c. 1 pounds of meat and 3 pounds of potatoes.
  d. 4 pounds of meat and 1 pound of potatoes.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   037.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-8

Assume that England and Spain can switch between producing cheese and producing bread at a constant rate.

  Labor Hours Needed to Make 1 Unit of Number of Units Produced in 24 Hours
 Cheese Bread Cheese Bread
 England 2 3 12 8
Spain 3 6 8 4

 

 

 

38. Refer to Table 3-8. Assume that England and Spain each has 24 labor hours available. If each country divides its time equally between the production of cheese and bread, then total production is

  a. 10 units of cheese and 6 units of bread.
  b. 25 units of cheese and 7.5 units of bread.
  c. 20 units of cheese and 12 units of bread.
  d. 12 units of cheese and 8 units of bread.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Efficiency
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   038.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

39. Refer to Table 3-8. Which of the following combinations of cheese and bread could Spain produce in 24 hours?

  a. 4 units of cheese and 3 units of bread.
  b. 6 units of cheese and 1 units of bread.
  c. 7 units of cheese and 1.5 units of bread.
  d. 3 units of cheese and 3 units of bread.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   039.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

40. Refer to Table 3-8. Which of the following combinations of cheese and bread could England not produce in 24 hours?

  a. 5 units of cheese and 3 units of bread.
  b. 6 units of cheese and 4 units of bread.
  c. 8 units of cheese and 3 units of bread.
  d. 7 units of cheese and 2 units of bread.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   040.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

41. Refer to Table 3-8. We could use the information in the table to draw a production possibilities frontier for England and a second production possibilities frontier for Spain. If we were to do this, measuring cheese along the horizontal axis, then

  a. the slope of England’s production possibilities frontier would be -0.67 and the slope of Spain’s production possibilities frontier would be -0.5.
  b. the slope of England’s production possibilities frontier would be -1.5 and the slope of Spain’s production possibilities frontier would be -2.
  c. the slope of England’s production possibilities frontier would be -.75 and the slope of Spain’s production possibilities frontier would be -1.
  d. the slope of England’s production possibilities frontier would be -2 and the slope of Spain’s production possibilities frontier would be -.5.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   041.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

42. Refer to Table 3-8. We could use the information in the table to draw a production possibilities frontier for England and a second production possibilities frontier for Spain. If we were to do this, measuring bread along the horizontal axis, then

  a. the slope of England’s production possibilities frontier would be -0.67 and the slope of Spain’s production possibilities frontier would be -0.5.
  b. the slope of England’s production possibilities frontier would be -1.5 and the slope of Spain’s production possibilities frontier would be -2.
  c. the slope of England’s production possibilities frontier would be -.75 and the slope of Spain’s production possibilities frontier would be -1.
  d. the slope of England’s production possibilities frontier would be -2 and the slope of Spain’s production possibilities frontier would be -.5.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   042.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-9

Assume that Maya and Miguel can switch between producing mixers and producing toasters at a constant rate.

   Hours Needed to Make 1 Amount Produced in 60 Hours
 Mixer Toaster Mixer Toaster
 Maya  6 3 10 20
Miguel 10 5 6 12

 

43. Refer to Table 3-9. Assume that Maya and Miguel each has 60 hours available. If each person divides his/her time equally between the production of mixers and toasters, then total production is

  a. 8 mixers and 16 toasters.
  b. 3.5 mixers and 6 toasters.
  c. 15 mixers and 9 toasters.
  d. 20 mixers and 12 toasters.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Efficiency
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   043.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

44. Refer to Table 3-9. Which of the following combinations of mixers and toasters could Maya produce in 60 hours?

  a. 5 mixers and 12 toasters.
  b. 6 mixers and 4 toasters.
  c. 7 mixers and 7 toasters.
  d. 8 mixers and 5 toasters.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   044.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

45. Refer to Table 3-9. Which of the following combinations of mixers and toasters could Miguel not produce in 80 hours?

  a. 5 mixers and 6 toasters.
  b. 6 mixers and 5 toasters.
  c. 7 mixers and 2 toasters.
  d. 4 mixers and 8 toasters.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   045.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

46. Refer to Table 3-9. We could use the information in the table to draw a production possibilities frontier for Maya and a second production possibilities frontier for Miguel. If we were to do this, measuring mixers along the horizontal axis, then

  a. the slope of Maya’s production possibilities frontier would be -2 and the slope of Miguel’s production possibilities frontier would be -2.
  b. the slope of Maya’s production possibilities frontier would be -0.5 and the slope of Miguel’s production possibilities frontier would be -0.5.
  c. the slope of Maya’s production possibilities frontier would be -1.67 and the slope of Miguel’s production possibilities frontier would be -1.67.
  d. the slope of Maya’s production possibilities frontier would be -0.6 and the slope of Miguel’s production possibilities frontier would be -0.6.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   046.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

47. Refer to Table 3-9. We could use the information in the table to draw a production possibilities frontier for Maya and a second production possibilities frontier for Miguel. If we were to do this, measuring toasters along the horizontal axis, then

  a. the slope of Maya’s production possibilities frontier would be -2 and the slope of Miguel’s production possibilities frontier would be -2.
  b. the slope of Maya’s production possibilities frontier would be -0.5 and the slope of Miguel’s production possibilities frontier would be -0.5.
  c. the slope of Maya’s production possibilities frontier would be -1.67 and the slope of Miguel’s production possibilities frontier would be -1.67.
  d. the slope of Maya’s production possibilities frontier would be -0.6 and the slope of Miguel’s production possibilities frontier would be -0.6.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   047.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-10

Assume that Japan and Korea can switch between producing cars and producing airplanes at a constant rate.

  Hours Needed to Make 1 Quantity Produced in 2400 Hours
 Car Airplane Car Airplane
 Japan 30 150 80 16
 Korea  50 150 48 16

 

48. Refer to Table 3-10. Assume that Japan and Korea each has 2400 hours available. If each country divides its time equally between the production of cars and airplanes, then total production is

  a. 40 cars and 8 airplanes.
  b. 64 cars and 16 airplanes.
  c. 80 cars and 16 airplanes.
  d. 128 cars and 32 airplanes.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Efficiency
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   048.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

49. Refer to Table 3-10. We could use the information in the table to draw a production possibilities frontier for Japan and a second production possibilities frontier for Korea. If we were to do this, measuring cars along the horizontal axis, then

  a. the slope of Japan’s production possibilities frontier would be -5 and the slope of Korea’s production possibilities frontier would be -3.
  b. the slope of Japan’s production possibilities frontier would be -0.2 and the slope of Korea’s production possibilities frontier would be -0.33.
  c. the slope of Japan’s production possibilities frontier would be 0.2 and the slope of Korea’s production possibilities frontier would be 0.33.
  d. the slope of Japan’s production possibilities frontier would be 5 and the slope of Korea’s production possibilities frontier would be 3.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   049.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

50. Refer to Table 3-10. We could use the information in the table to draw a production possibilities frontier for Japan and a second production possibilities frontier for Korea. If we were to do this, measuring airplanes along the horizontal axis, then

  a. the slope of Japan’s production possibilities frontier would be -5 and the slope of Korea’s production possibilities frontier would be -3.
  b. the slope of Japan’s production possibilities frontier would be -0.2 and the slope of Korea’s production possibilities frontier would be -0.33.
  c. the slope of Japan’s production possibilities frontier would be 0.2 and the slope of Korea’s production possibilities frontier would be 0.33.
  d. the slope of Japan’s production possibilities frontier would be 5 and the slope of Korea’s production possibilities frontier would be 3.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   050.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-11

Assume that Max and Min can switch between producing mittens and producing hats at a constant rate.

  Labor Hours Needed to Make 1 Quantity Produced in 36 Hours
 Mittens Hats Mittens Hats
 Max 2 6 18 6
Min 2 4 18 9

 

 

 

51. Refer to Table 3-11. Assume that Max and Min each has 36 labor hours available. If each person divides his/her time equally between the production of mittens and hats, then total production is

  a. 18 mittens and 6 hats.
  b. 18 mittens and 7.5 hats.
  c. 16 mittens and 12 hats.
  d. 36 mittens and 15 hats.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Efficiency
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   051.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

52. Refer to Table 3-11. Which of the following points would not be on Max’s production possibilities frontier, based on a 36-hour production period?

  a. (18 mittens, 0 hats)
  b. (12 mittens, 2 hats)
  c. (6 mittens, 4 hats)
  d. (2 mittens, 6 hats)

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   052.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

53. Refer to Table 3-11. Which of the following points would be on Min’s production possibilities frontier, based on a 36-hour production period?

  a. (3 mittens, 8 hats)
  b. (8 mittens, 5 hat)
  c. (10 mittens, 4 hats)
  d. More than one of the above would be on Min’s production possibilities frontier.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   053.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-12

Barb and Jim run a business that sets up and tests computers. Assume that Barb and Jim can switch between setting up and testing computers at a constant rate. The following table applies.

  Minutes Needed to Number of Computers Set Up or Tested in a 40-Hour Week
 Set Up 1 Computer  Test 1 Computer  Computers Set Up Computers Tested
 Barb 48 ? 50 40
 Jim 30 40 80 60

 

54. Refer to Table 3-12. The number of minutes needed by Barb to test a computer is

  a. 36.
  b. 48.
  c. 60.
  d. 64.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   054.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

55. Refer to Table 3-12. Which of the following points would not be on Barb’s production possibilities frontier, based on a 40-hour week?

  a. (0 computers set up, 40 computers tested)
  b. (8 computers set up, 32 computers tested)
  c. (25 computers set up, 20 computers tested)
  d. (30 computers set up, 16 computers tested)

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   055.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

56. Refer to Table 3-12. Which of the following points would not be on Jim’s production possibilities frontier, based on a 40-hour week?

  a. (0 computers set up, 60 computers tested)
  b. (40 computers set up, 30 computers tested)
  c. (60 computers set up, 12 computers tested)
  d. (72 computers set up, 6 computers tested)

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   056.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-13

Juanita and Shantala run a business that programs and tests cellular phones. Assume that Juanita and Shantala can switch between programming and testing cellular phones at a constant rate. The following table applies.

  Minutes Needed to Number of Cellular Phones Programmed or Tested in a 40-Hour Week
   Program 1 Cellular Phone Test 1 Cellular Phone Cellular Phones Programmed Cellular Phones Tested
 Juanita  ?  2  160  1200
 Shantala  10  4  240  600

 

57. Refer to Table 3-13. The number of minutes needed by Juanita to program a cellular phone is

  a. 4.
  b. 5.
  c. 7.5.
  d. 15.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Efficiency
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   057.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

58. Refer to Table 3-13. Which of the following points would be on Juanita’s production possibilities frontier, based on a 40-hour week?

  a. (120 cellular phones programmed, 295 cellular phones tested)
  b. (130 cellular phones programmed, 225 cellular phones tested)
  c. (140 cellular phones programmed, 155 cellular phones tested)
  d. Both (a) and (b) would be on Juanita’s production possibilities frontier.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   058.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

59. Refer to Table 3-13. Which of the following points would be on Shantala’s production possibilities frontier, based on a 40-hour week?

  a. (120 cellular phones programmed, 250 cellular phones tested)
  b. (180 cellular phones programmed, 150 cellular phones tested)
  c. (240 cellular phones programmed, 600 cellular phones tested)
  d. More than one of the above would be on Shantala’s production possibilities frontier.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   059.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-14
Assume that Nick and Faldo can switch between producing wheat and producing cloth at a constant rate.

  Quantity Produced in 1 Hour
Bushels of Wheat Yards of Cloth
Nick 8 12
Faldo 6 15

 

60. Refer to Table 3-14. Assume that Nick and Faldo each has 2 hours available. If each person divides his time equally between the production of wheat and cloth, then total production is

  a. 8 bushels of wheat and 15 yards of cloth.
  b. 14 bushels of wheat and 27 yards of cloth.
  c. 16 bushels of wheat and 30 yards of cloth.
  d. 28 bushels of wheat and 34 yards of cloth.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   060.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-15

  Labor Hours Needed to Make 1 Pound of Amount Produced in 40 Hours
 Meat Potatoes Meat Potatoes
 Farmer 8 hours/pound 5 hours/pound 5 pounds 8 pounds
Rancher 4 hours/pound 10 hours/pound 10 pounds 4 pounds

 

61. Refer to Table 3-15. Assume that the farmer and the rancher each has 40 labor hours available. If each person divides his time equally between the production of meat and potatoes, then total production is

  a. 5 pounds of meat and 4 pounds of potatoes.
  b. 6 pounds of meat and 7.5 pounds of potatoes.
  c. 7.5 pounds of meat and 6 pounds of potatoes.
  d. 10 pounds of meat and 8 pounds of potatoes.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Efficiency
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   061.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

62. Refer to Table 3-15. Which of the following combinations of meat and potatoes could the farmer produce in 40 hours?

  a. 1 pound of meat and 7 pounds of potatoes.
  b. 2 pounds of meat and 5 pounds of potatoes.
  c. 3 pounds of meat and 3 pounds of potatoes.
  d. 4 pounds of meat and 2 pounds of potatoes.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   062.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

63. Refer to Table 3-15. Which of the following combinations of meat and potatoes could the rancher not produce in 40 hours?

  a. 2 pounds of meat and 3 pounds of potatoes.
  b. 3 pounds of meat and 3 pounds of potatoes.
  c. 4 pounds of meat and 2 pounds of potatoes.
  d. 5 pounds of meat and 2 pound of potatoes.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   063.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-16
The following table contains some production possibilities for an economy for a given month.

Blankets Coats
8 600
12 ?
16 200

 

64. Refer to Table 3-16. If the production possibilities frontier is bowed outward, then “?” could be

  a. 200.
  b. 300.
  c. 400.
  d. 500.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   064.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

65. Refer to Table 3-16. If the production possibilities frontier is a straight line, then “?” must be

  a. 200.
  b. 300.
  c. 400.
  d. 500.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   065.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-17
The following table contains some production possibilities for an economy for a given year.

Cakes Pies
10 600
20 400
30 ?

 

66. Refer to Table 3-17. If the production possibilities frontier is bowed outward, then “?” could be

  a. 180.
  b. 200.
  c. 220
  d. 240.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   066.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

67. Refer to Table 3-17. If the production possibilities frontier is a straight line, then “?” must be

  a. 180.
  b. 200.
  c. 220.
  d. 240.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   067.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-18
The following table contains some production possibilities for an economy for a given month.

Apples Oranges
120 450
180 ?
240 150

 

68. Refer to Table 3-18. If the production possibilities frontier is bowed outward, then “?” could be

  a. 150.
  b. 225.
  c. 300.
  d. 375.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   068.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

69. Refer to Table 3-18. If the production possibilities frontier is a straight line, then “?” must be

  a. 150.
  b. 225.
  c. 300.
  d. 375.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   069.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-19 Summary of the Gains from Trade

   Alice  Betty
 Lemonade (in pitchers) Pizza Lemonade (in pitchers) Pizza
 Without Trade        
 Production and Consumption  200 100 180 180
         
 With Trade        
 Production  400 0 0 300
 Trade  Gives 193 Gets 110 Gets 190 Gives 110
 Consumption  a b c d
         
 Gains from Trade  e f g h

 

70. Refer to Table 3-19. The values in the table represent the amounts of lemonade and pizzas that Alice and Betty can produce in one week without and with specialization and trade. What are Alice and Betty’s gains from specialization and trade?

  a. Alice gains 7 pitchers of lemonade and 10 pizzas, while Betty gains 13 pitchers of lemonade and 10 pizzas.
  b. Alice gains 200 pitchers of lemonade and 100 pizzas, while Betty gains 180 pitchers of lemonade and 180 pizzas.
  c. Alice gains 207 pitchers of lemonade and 110 pizzas, while Betty gains 193 pitchers of lemonade and 190 pizzas.
  d. Alice gains 400 pitchers of lemonade and 0 pizzas, while Betty gains 0 pitchers of lemonade and 300 pizzas.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   International trade
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   070.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

Figure 3-1

  Panel (a) Panel (b)

 

71. Refer to Figure 3-1. The rate of tradeoff between producing chairs and producing couches is constant in

  a. Panel (a).
  b. Panel (b).
  c. both Panel (a) and Panel (b).
  d. neither Panel (a) nor Panel (b).

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Tradeoffs
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   071.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

72. Refer to Figure 3-1. The rate of tradeoff between producing chairs and producing couches depends on how many chairs and couches are being produced in

  a. Panel (a).
  b. Panel (b).
  c. both Panel (a) and Panel (b).
  d. neither Panel (a) nor Panel (b).

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Tradeoffs
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   072.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

Figure 3-2

Brazil’s Production Possibilities Frontier

 

73. Refer to Figure 3-2. The fact that the line slopes downward reflects the fact that

  a. for Brazil, it is more costly to produce peanuts than it is to produce cashews.
  b. Brazil will produce more peanuts and fewer cashews as time goes by.
  c. Brazil faces a tradeoff between producing peanuts and producing cashews.
  d. Brazil should specialize in producing cashews.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.053 – Describe why society faces a trade-off between the production of two goods.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Tradeoffs
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   073.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

74. Refer to Figure 3-2. If the production possibilities frontier shown is for 24 hours of production, then how long does it take Brazil to make one peanut?

  a. 1/10 hour
  b. 1/3 hour
  c. 3 hours
  d. 10 hours

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.053 – Describe why society faces a trade-off between the production of two goods.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   074.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

75. Refer to Figure 3-2. If the production possibilities frontier shown is for 24 hours of production, then how long does it take Brazil to make one cashew?

  a. 1/10 hour
  b. 1/3 hour
  c. 3 hours
  d. 10 hours

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.053 – Describe why society faces a trade-off between the production of two goods.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   075.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

76. Refer to Figure 3-2. If the production possibilities frontier shown is for two months of production, then which of the following combinations of peanuts and cashews could Brazil produce in two months?

  a. 7 peanuts and 35 cashews
  b. 5 peanuts and 100 cashews
  c. 2 peanuts and 190 cashews
  d. 3 peanuts and 150 cashews

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   076.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

77. Refer to Figure 3-2. If the production possibilities frontier shown is for two months of production, then which of the following combinations of peanuts and cashews could Brazil not produce in two months?

  a. 5 peanuts and 88 cashews
  b. 4 peanuts and 115 cashews
  c. 3 peanuts and 155 cashews
  d. 1 peanuts and 200 cashews

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   077.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

Figure 3-3

Arturo’s Production Possibilities Frontier Dina’s Production Possibilities Frontier

 

78. Refer to Figure 3-3. If Dina must work 0.25 hour to produce each taco, then her production possibilities frontier is based on how many hours of work?

  a. 40 hours
  b. 100 hours
  c. 400 hours
  d. 1600 hours

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.037 – Construct a production possibilities frontier.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   078.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

79. Refer to Figure 3-3. If the production possibilities frontier shown for Arturo is for 100 hours of production, then how long does it take Arturo to make one burrito?

  a. 1/4 hour
  b. 1/3 hour
  c. 3 hours
  d. 4 hours

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.037 – Construct a production possibilities frontier.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   079.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

80. Refer to Figure 3-3. If Arturo and Dina both spend all of their time producing tacos, then total production is

  a. 400 tacos and 0 burritos.
  b. 400 tacos and 250 burritos.
  c. 800 tacos and 0 burritos.
  d. 800 tacos and 500 burritos.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.037 – Construct a production possibilities frontier.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   080.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

81. Refer to Figure 3-3. If Arturo and Dina each divides his/her time equally between the production of tacos and burritos, then total production is

  a. 200 tacos and 150 burritos.
  b. 400 tacos and 250 burritos.
  c. 400 tacos and 300 burritos.
  d. 800 tacos and 500 burritos.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Efficiency
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   081.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

82. Refer to Figure 3-3. If the production possibilities frontiers shown are each for one day of production, then which of the following combinations of tacos and burritos could Arturo and Dina together produce in a given day?

  a. 400 tacos and 350 burritos
  b. 500 tacos and 250 burritos
  c. 600 tacos and 150 burritos
  d. 700 tacos and 100 burritos

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   082.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

83. Refer to Figure 3-3. If the production possibilities frontiers shown are each for one day of production, then which of the following combinations of tacos and burritos could Arturo and Dina together not produce in a given day?

  a. 200 tacos and 400 burritos
  b. 300 tacos and 350 burritos
  c. 400 tacos and 300 burritos
  d. 600 tacos and 250 burritos

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   083.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

Figure 3-4

Lisa’s Production Possibilities Frontier Bryce’s Production Possibilities Frontier

 

84. Refer to Figure 3-4. If Bryce must work 4 months to produce each sweater, then his production possibilities frontier is based on how many months of work?

  a. 4 months
  b. 8 months
  c. 12 months
  d. 16 months

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.146 – Generate the graph of a production possibility frontier for any two commodities.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   084.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

85. Refer to Figure 3-4. If the production possibilities frontier shown for Lisa is for 4 months of work, then how long does it take Lisa to produce one jacket?

  a. 1/4 month
  b. 1/2 month
  c. 2 months
  d. 4 months

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   085.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

86. Refer to Figure 3-4. If Lisa and Bryce both spend all of their time producing jackets, then total production is

  a. 2 jackets.
  b. 6 jackets.
  c. 24 jackets.
  d. 26 jackets.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   086.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

87. Refer to Figure 3-4. If Lisa and Bryce each divides his or her time equally between producing jackets and producing sweaters, then total production is

  a. 2 sweaters and 8 jackets.
  b. 3 sweaters and 13 jackets.
  c. 5 sweaters and 8 jackets.
  d. 6 sweaters and 26 jackets.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.037 – Construct a production possibilities frontier.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Efficiency
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   087.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

88. Refer to Figure 3-4. If the production possibilities frontiers shown are each for one year of working, then which of the following combinations of jackets and sweaters could Lisa and Bryce together produce in a given year?

  a. 1 sweater and 22 jackets
  b. 2 sweaters and 20 jackets
  c. 4 sweaters and 12 jackets
  d. 5 sweaters and 7 jackets

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   088.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

89. Refer to Figure 3-4. If the production possibilities frontiers shown are each for one year of production, then which of the following combinations of sweaters and jackets could Lisa and Bryce together not produce in a given year?

  a. 1 sweater and 21 jackets
  b. 2 sweaters and 20 jackets
  c. 3 sweaters and 12 jackets
  d. 5 sweaters and 4 jackets

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   089.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

Figure 3-5

Hosne’s Production Possibilities Frontier Merve’s Production Possibilities Frontier

 

90. Refer to Figure 3-5. If Hosne must work 0.5 hour to make each purse, then her production possibilities frontier is based on how many hours of work?

  a. 2 hours
  b. 5 hours
  c. 20 hours
  d. 50 hours

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.037 – Construct a production possibilities frontier.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   090.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

91. Refer to Figure 3-5. If the production possibilities frontier shown for Merve is for 8 hours of work, then how long does it take Merve to make one purse?

  a. 1/2 hour
  b. 2 hours
  c. 4 hours
  d. 8 hours

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.037 – Construct a production possibilities frontier.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   091.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

92. Refer to Figure 3-5. If Hosne and Merve both spend all of their time making wallets, then total production is

  a. 7 wallets.
  b. 8 wallets.
  c. 14 wallets.
  d. 28 wallets.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.037 – Construct a production possibilities frontier.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   092.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

93. Refer to Figure 3-5. If Hosne and Merve each divides her time equally between making purses and making wallets, then total production is

  a. 4 purses and 8 wallets.
  b. 7 purses and 7 wallets.
  c. 10 purses and 6 wallets.
  d. 14 purses and 14 wallets.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.037 – Construct a production possibilities frontier.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Efficiency
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   093.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

Figure 3-6

Maxine’s Production Possibilities Frontier Daisy’s Production Possibilities Frontier

 

94. Refer to Figure 3-6. If Daisy must work 2.5 hours to make each pie, then her production possibilities frontier is based on how many hours of work?

  a. 6 hours
  b. 7.5 hours
  c. 37.5 hours
  d. 50 hours

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.037 – Construct a production possibilities frontier.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   094.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

95. Refer to Figure 3-6. If the production possibilities frontier shown for Maxine is for 3 hours of work, then how long does it take Maxine to make one pie?

  a. 1/4 hour
  b. 1/3 hour
  c. 3 hours
  d. 4 hours

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.037 – Construct a production possibilities frontier.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   095.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

96. Refer to Figure 3-6. If Maxine and Daisy each divides her time equally between making pies and making tarts, then total production is

  a. 6 pies and 10 tarts.
  b. 7.5 pies and 3 tarts.
  c. 7.5 pies and 10 tarts.
  d. 13.5 pies and 13 tarts.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.037 – Construct a production possibilities frontier.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Efficiency
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   096.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

97. Refer to Figure 3-6. If the production possibilities frontiers shown are each for one day of work, then which of the following combinations of pies and tarts could Maxine and Daisy together not make in a given day?

  a. 2 pies and 25 tarts
  b. 10 pies and 22 tarts
  c. 12 pies and 15 tarts
  d. 15 pies and 16 tarts

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   097.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

Figure 3-7

Bintu’s Production Possibilities Frontier Juba’s Production Possibilities Frontier

 

98. Refer to Figure 3-7. If Bintu must work 2 hours to make each cup, then her production possibilities frontier is based on how many hours of work?

  a. 2 hours
  b. 4 hours
  c. 8 hours
  d. 16 hours

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.037 – Construct a production possibilities frontier.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   098.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

99. Refer to Figure 3-7. If the production possibilities frontier shown for Juba is for 2 hours of work, then how long does it take Juba to make one bowl?

  a. 1/8 hour
  b. 1/2 hour
  c. 2 hours
  d. 8 hours

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.037 – Construct a production possibilities frontier.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   099.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

100. Refer to Figure 3-7. If Bintu and Juba both spend all of their time making bowls, then total production is

  a. 2 bowls.
  b. 3 bowls.
  c. 4 bowls.
  d. 6 bowls.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.037 – Construct a production possibilities frontier.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   100.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

101. Refer to Figure 3-7. If Bintu and Juba each divides her time equally between making bowls and making cups, then total production is

  a. 2 bowls and 6 cups.
  b. 3 bowls and 7 cups.
  c. 4 bowls and 8 cups.
  d. 6 bowls and 14 cups.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.037 – Construct a production possibilities frontier.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Efficiency
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   101.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

102. Refer to Figure 3-7. If the production possibilities frontiers shown are each for 4 hours of work, then which of the following combinations of bowls and cups could Bintu and Juba together make in a given 4-hour production period?

  a. 1 bowl and 14 cups
  b. 2 bowls and 11 cups
  c. 3 bowls and 10 cups
  d. 5 bowls and 5 cups

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   102.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

103. Refer to Figure 3-7. If the production possibilities frontiers shown are each for 4 hours of work, then which of the following combinations of bowls and cups could Bintu and Juba together not make in a given 4-hour production period?

  a. 3 bowls and 9.5 cups
  b. 4.5 bowls and 6 cups
  c. 5 bowls and 4 cups
  d. 6 bowls and 1 cups

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   103.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

Figure 3-8

Chile’s Production Possibilities Frontier Colombia’s Production Possibilities Frontier

 

104. Refer to Figure 3-8. If Chile and Colombia each divides its time equally between making coffee and making soybeans, then total production is

  a. 12 pounds of coffee and 12 pounds of soybeans.
  b. 14 pounds of coffee and 9 pounds of soybeans.
  c. 16 pounds of coffee and 6 pounds of soybeans.
  d. 28 pounds of coffee and 18 pounds of soybeans.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.037 – Construct a production possibilities frontier.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Efficiency
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   104.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

105. Refer to Figure 3-8. If the production possibilities frontiers shown are each for one day of production, then which of the following combinations of coffee and soybeans could Chile and Colombia together make in a given day?

  a. 4 pounds of coffee and 16 pounds of soybeans
  b. 8 pounds of coffee and 15 pounds of soybeans
  c. 16 pounds of coffee and 10 pounds of soybeans
  d. 24 pounds of coffee and 4 pounds of soybeans

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   105.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

106. Refer to Figure 3-8. If the production possibilities frontiers shown are each for one day of production, then which of the following combinations of pounds of coffee and pounds of soybeans could Chile and Colombia together not make in a given day?

  a. 4 pounds of coffee and 17 pounds of soybeans
  b. 8 pounds of coffee and 14 pounds of soybeans
  c. 16 pounds of coffee and 9 pounds of soybeans
  d. 24 pounds of coffee and 3 pounds of soybeans

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   106.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

Figure 3-9

Uzbekistan’s Production Possibilities Frontier Azerbaijan’s Production Possibilities Frontier

 

107. Refer to Figure 3-9. If Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan each divides its time equally between making bolts and making nails, then total production is

  a. 15 bolts and 40 nails.
  b. 25 bolts and 70 nails.
  c. 30 bolts and 80 nails.
  d. 50 bolts and 140 nails.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.037 – Construct a production possibilities frontier.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Efficiency
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   107.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

108. Refer to Figure 3-9. If the production possibilities frontiers shown are each for two days of production, then which of the following combinations of bolts and nails could Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan together make in a given 2-day production period?

  a. 12 bolts and 120 nails
  b. 24 bolts and 96 nails
  c. 38 bolts and 50 nails
  d. 44 bolts and 24 nails

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   108.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

109. Refer to Figure 3-9. If the production possibilities frontiers shown are each for two days of production, then which of the following combinations of bolts and nails could Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan together not make in a given 2-day production period?

  a. 9 bolts and 122 nails
  b. 21 bolts and 98 nails
  c. 36 bolts and 56 nails
  d. 47 bolts and 18 nails

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   109.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

Figure 3-10
Alice and Betty’s Production Possibilities in one 8-hour day.

Alice’s Production Possibilities Frontier Betty’s Production Possibilities Frontier

 

110. Refer to Figure 3-10. Both Alice and Betty

  a. face a constant trade-off between producing pitchers of lemonade and pizzas.
  b. can produce more pizzas than pitchers of lemonade if they devote all of their time to pizza production.
  c. would benefit from specializing in lemonade production.
  d. would benefit from specializing in pizza production.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.053 – Describe why society faces a trade-off between the production of two goods.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Tradeoffs
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   110.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

111. Refer to Figure 3-10. If Alice produces only lemonade, she can produce

  a. 200 pitchers per day.
  b. 300 pitchers per day.
  c. 400 pitchers per day.
  d. 450 pitchers per day.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Easy
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.037 – Construct a production possibilities frontier.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   111.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

112. Refer to Figure 3-10. If point A represents Alice’s production and point B represents Betty’s production,

  a. Alice produces 200 pitchers of lemonade and 100 pizzas while Betty produces 180 pitchers of lemonade and 180 pizzas.
  b. Alice produces 180 pitchers of lemonade and 180 pizzas while Betty produces 200 pitchers of lemonade and 100 pizzas.
  c. Alice produces 100 pitchers of lemonade and 200 pizzas while Betty produces 180 pitchers of lemonade and 180 pizzas.
  d. Only Alice can benefit from specialization and trade.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.037 – Construct a production possibilities frontier.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   112.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

113. Refer to Figure 3-10. If point A represents Alice’s current production and point B represents Betty’s current production, under what circumstances can both Alice and Betty benefit from specialization and trade?

  a. Alice produces more pizzas and Betty produces more lemonade.
  b. Alice produces more lemonade and Betty produces more pizzas.
  c. Both Alice and Betty produce only pizzas.
  d. There are no circumstances under which both Alice and Betty can benefit from specialization and trade.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   113.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

Figure 3-11
The graph below represents the various combinations of ham and cheese (in pounds) that the nation of Bonovia could produce in a given month.

 

114. Refer to Figure 3-11. If the production possibilities frontier shown is for 240 hours of production, then how long does it take Bonovia to make one pound of cheese?

  a. 3/5 hour
  b. 3/4 hour
  c. 4/3 hours
  d. 5/3 hours

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.037 – Construct a production possibilities frontier.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   114.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

115. Refer to Figure 3-11. If the production possibilities frontier shown is for 240 hours of production, then which of the following combinations of ham and cheese could Bonovia produce in 240 hours?

  a. 225 pounds of ham and 140 pounds of cheese
  b. 280 pounds of ham and 100 pounds of cheese
  c. 355 pounds of ham and 80 pounds of cheese
  d. 330 pounds of ham and 60 pounds of cheese

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   115.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

116. Refer to Figure 3-11. If the production possibilities frontier shown is for 240 hours of production, then which of the following combinations of ham and cheese could Bonovia not produce in 240 hours?

  a. 250 pounds of ham and 120 pounds of cheese
  b. 200 pounds of ham and 160 pounds of cheese
  c. 160 pounds of ham and 200 pounds of cheese
  d. 100 pounds of ham and 240 pounds of cheese

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   116.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

Figure 3-12

Argentina’s Production Possibilities Frontier Peru’s Production Possibilities Frontier

 

117. Refer to Figure 3-12. If Argentina and Peru each divides its time equally between producing corn and fish, then total production is

  a. 13 tons of corn and 15 tons of fish.
  b. 13 tons of corn and 10 tons of fish.
  c. 12 tons of corn and 16 tons of fish.
  d. 12 tons of corn and 11 tons of fish

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.037 – Construct a production possibilities frontier.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Efficiency
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   117.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

118. ​A production possibilities frontier (PPF) is characterized by increasing opportunity costs when

  a. ​the PPF is a straight line
  b. ​the PPF is bowed inward
  c. ​the PPF is bowed outward
  d. ​increasing opportunity costs do not occur with PPF’s

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.144 – Explain why the slope of a production possibilities frontier is not constant.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Knowledge
CUSTOM ID:   118.03.1 – MC – MANK08

 

1. By definition, imports are

  a. people who work in foreign countries.
  b. goods in which a country has an absolute advantage.
  c. limits placed on the quantity of goods leaving a country.
  d. goods produced abroad and sold domestically.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Easy
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.098 – Examine the effects of international trade on exporting and importing countries.
TOPICS:   International trade
Imports
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Knowledge
CUSTOM ID:   001.03.3 – MC – MANK08

 

2. By definition, exports are

  a. limits placed on the quantity of goods brought into a country.
  b. goods in which a country has an absolute advantage.
  c. people who work in foreign countries.
  d. goods produced domestically and sold abroad.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Easy
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.098 – Examine the effects of international trade on exporting and importing countries.
TOPICS:   International trade
Exports
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Knowledge
CUSTOM ID:   002.03.3 – MC – MANK08

 

3. Goods produced abroad and sold domestically are called

  a. exports.
  b. imports.
  c. exchange rates.
  d. opportunity costs.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Easy
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.098 – Examine the effects of international trade on exporting and importing countries.
TOPICS:   International trade
Imports
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Knowledge
CUSTOM ID:   003.03.3 – MC – MANK08

 

4. Trade between countries

  a. allows each country to consume at a point outside its production possibilities frontier.
  b. limits a country’s ability to produce goods and services on its own.
  c. must benefit both countries equally; otherwise, trade is not mutually beneficial.
  d. can best be understood by examining the countries’ absolute advantages.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   International trade
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   004.03.3 – MC – MANK08

 

5. When a country has a comparative advantage in producing a certain good,

  a. the country should import that good.
  b. the country should produce just enough of that good for its own consumption.
  c. the country’s opportunity cost of that good is high relative to other countries’ opportunity costs of that same good.
  d. None of the above is correct.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   005.03.3 – MC – MANK08

 

6. Which of the following would not result from all countries specializing according to the principle of comparative advantage?

  a. The size of the economic pie would increase.
  b. Worldwide production of goods and services would increase.
  c. The well-being of citizens in each country would be enhanced.
  d. Each country’s production possibilities frontier would shift inward.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   006.03.3 – MC – MANK08

 

7. A country that currently does not trade with other countries could benefit by

  a. restricting imports and promoting exports.
  b. promoting imports and restricting exports.
  c. restricting both imports and exports.
  d. not restricting trade.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   International trade
Open economy
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   007.03.3 – MC – MANK08

 

8. Suppose the United States has a comparative advantage over Mexico in producing pork. The principle of comparative advantage asserts that

  a. the United States should produce more pork than what it requires and export some of it to Mexico.
  b. the United States should produce a moderate quantity of pork and import the remainder of what it requires from Mexico.
  c. the United States should refrain altogether from producing pork and import all of what it requires from Mexico.
  d. Mexico has nothing to gain from importing United States pork.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   008.03.3 – MC – MANK08

 

9. Belarus has a comparative advantage in the production of linen, but Russia has an absolute advantage in the production of linen. If these two countries decide to trade,

  a. Belarus should export linen to Russia.
  b. Russia should export linen to Belarus.
  c. trading linen would provide no net advantage to either country.
  d. Without additional information about opportunity costs, this question cannot be answered.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   009.03.3 – MC – MANK08

 

10. Suppose that a worker in Boatland can produce either 5 units of wheat or 25 units of fish per year, and a worker in Farmland can produce either 25 units of wheat or 5 units of fish per year. There are 10 workers in each country. Political pressure from the fish lobby in Farmland and from the wheat lobby in Boatland has prevented trade between the two countries on the grounds that cheap imports would kill the fish industry in Farmland and the wheat industry in Boatland. As a result, Boatland produces and consumes 25 units of wheat and 125 units of fish per year while Farmland produces and consumes 125 units of wheat and 25 units of fish per year. If the political pressure were overcome and trade were to occur, each country would completely specialize in the product in which it has a comparative advantage. If trade were to occur, the combined output of the two countries would increase by

  a. 25 units of wheat and 25 units of fish.
  b. 50 units of wheat and 50 units of fish.
  c. 75 units of wheat and 75 units of fish.
  d. 100 units of wheat and 100 units of fish.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   010.03.3 – MC – MANK08

 

11. Suppose that a worker in Boatland can produce either 5 units of wheat or 25 units of fish per year, and a worker in Farmland can produce either 25 units of wheat or 5 units of fish per year. There are 30 workers in each country. No trade occurs between the two countries. Boatland produces and consumes 75 units of wheat and 375 units of fish per year while Farmland produces and consumes 375 units of wheat and 75 units of fish per year. If trade were to occur, Boatland would trade 90 units of fish to Farmland in exchange for 80 units of wheat. If Boatland now completely specializes in fish production, how many units of fish could it now consume along with the 80 units of imported wheat?

  a. 490 units
  b. 500 units
  c. 610 units
  d. 660 units

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   011.03.3 – MC – MANK08

 

12. In which of the following cases should the United States produce more noodles than it wants for its own use and trade some of those noodles to Italy in exchange for wine?

  a. Americans know less than Italians know about cooking noodles.
  b. The United States has an absolute advantage over Italy in producing noodles.
  c. Italy has a comparative advantage over the United States in producing wine.
  d. The opportunity cost of producing a gallon of wine is the same for Italy as it is for the United States.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   012.03.3 – MC – MANK08

 

13. Suppose the U.S. and Japan can both produce airplanes and televisions and the U.S. has a comparative advantage in the production of airplanes while Japan has a comparative advantage in the production of televisions. Also suppose the U.S. has an absolute advantage in the production of both airplanes and televisions. The U.S. should

  a. not trade airplanes or televisions with Japan.
  b. import airplanes from Japan and export televisions to Japan.
  c. export airplanes to Japan and import televisions from Japan.
  d. export both airplanes and televisions to Japan.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   013.03.3 – MC – MANK08

 

14. Suppose the U.S. and Japan both produce airplanes and televisions and the U.S. has a comparative advantage in the production of airplanes while Japan has a comparative advantage in the production of televisions. If the U.S. exports airplanes to Japan and imports televisions from Japan,

  a. both countries, as a whole, will be better off.
  b. all individuals in both countries will be better off.
  c. both countries, as a whole, will be worse off.
  d. all individuals in both countries will be worse off.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Easy
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   014.03.3 – MC – MANK08

 

15. Serena Williams should pay someone else to mow her lawn instead of mowing it herself, unless

  a. Serena has an absolute advantage over everyone else in mowing her lawn.
  b. Serena has a comparative advantage over everyone else in mowing her lawn.
  c. Serena’s opportunity cost of mowing her lawn is higher than it is for everyone else.
  d. All of the above are correct.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   015.03.3 – MC – MANK08

 

16. Serena Williams should probably not mow her own lawn because

  a. her opportunity cost of mowing her lawn is higher than the cost of paying someone to mow it for her.
  b. she has a comparative advantage in mowing her lawn relative to a landscaping service.
  c. she has an absolute advantage in mowing her lawn relative to a landscaping service.
  d. she might sprain her ankle.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Opportunity cost
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   016.03.3 – MC – MANK08

 

17. When two countries trade with one another, it is most likely because

  a. the wealthy people in each of the two countries are able to benefit, through trade, by taking advantage of other people who are poor.
  b. some people involved in the trade do not understand that one of the two countries will become worse-off because of the trade.
  c. the opportunity costs of producing various goods are identical for the two countries.
  d. the two countries wish to take advantage of the principle of comparative advantage.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   017.03.3 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-37

Assume that Aruba and Iceland can switch between producing coolers and producing radios at a constant rate.

  Labor Hours
Needed to Make 1
Cooler Radio
Aruba 2 5
Iceland 1 4

 

18. Refer to Table 3-37. Aruba should export

  a. coolers and import radios.
  b. radios and import coolers.
  c. both goods and import neither good.
  d. neither good and import both goods.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   018.03.3 – MC – MANK08

 

19. Refer to Table 3-37. Iceland should export

  a. coolers and import radios.
  b. radios and import coolers.
  c. both goods and import neither good.
  d. neither good and import both goods.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   019.03.3 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-38

Assume that England and Spain can switch between producing cheese and producing bread at a constant rate.

  Labor Hours Needed to Make 1 Unit of Number of Units Produced in 40 Hours
   Cheese Bread  Cheese Bread
 England 1 4  40 10
 Spain 4 8  10 5

 

 

 

20. Refer to Table 3-38. England should export

  a. cheese and import bread.
  b. bread and import cheese.
  c. both goods and import neither good.
  d. neither good and import both goods.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   020.03.3 – MC – MANK08

 

21. Refer to Table 3-38. Spain should export

  a. cheese and import bread.
  b. bread and import cheese.
  c. both goods and import neither good.
  d. neither good and import both goods.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   021.03.3 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-39

Assume that Japan and Korea can switch between producing cars and producing airplanes at a constant rate.

  Hours Needed to Make 1 Quantity Produced in 2400 Hours
 Cars Airplanes Cars Airplanes
 Japan 30 150 80 16
Korea 50 150 48 16

 

22. Refer to Table 3-39. Japan should specialize in the production of

  a. cars and import airplanes.
  b. airplanes and import cars.
  c. both goods and import neither good.
  d. neither good and import both goods.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.107 – Explain how comparative advantage leads to specialization.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   022.03.3 – MC – MANK08

 

23. Refer to Table 3-39. Korea should specialize in the production of

  a. cars and import airplanes.
  b. airplanes and import cars.
  c. both goods and import neither good.
  d. neither good and import both goods.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.107 – Explain how comparative advantage leads to specialization.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   023.03.3 – MC – MANK08

 

Figure 3-25

Chile’s Production Possibilities Frontier Colombia’s Production Possibilities Frontier

 

24. Refer to Figure 3-25. Chile should specialize in the production of

  a. coffee and import soybeans.
  b. soybeans and import coffee.
  c. both goods and import neither good.
  d. neither good and import both goods.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.107 – Explain how comparative advantage leads to specialization.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   024.03.3 – MC – MANK08

 

25. Refer to Figure 3-25. Colombia should specialize in the production of

  a. coffee and import soybeans.
  b. soybeans and import coffee.
  c. both goods and import neither good.
  d. neither good and import both goods.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.107 – Explain how comparative advantage leads to specialization.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   025.03.3 – MC – MANK08

 

26. Alexis is a lawyer. She bills her clients $100 an hour for her services. She can also mow her lawn in 30 minutes. She can hire someone to mow her lawn who takes an hour. Of the following prices, which is the highest Alexis would pay someone to mow her lawn?

  a. $99
  b. $49
  c. $29
  d. Alexis would always mow her own lawn because she can do it faster.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   026.03.3 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-40

  Hours Needed to Make 1 Quantity Produced in 2400 Hours
   Boat Car Boat Car
Germany 40 30 60 80
Italy 40 50 60 48

 

27. Refer to Table 3-40. Germany should specialize in the production of

  a. boats and import cars.
  b. cars and import boats.
  c. both goods and import neither good.
  d. neither good and import both goods.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.107 – Explain how comparative advantage leads to specialization.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   027.03.3 – MC – MANK08

 

28. Refer to Table 3-40. Italy should specialize in the production of

  a. boats and import cars.
  b. cars and import boats.
  c. both goods and import neither good.
  d. neither good and import both goods.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.107 – Explain how comparative advantage leads to specialization.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   028.03.3 – MC – MANK08

 

1. Assume for the United States that the opportunity cost of each airplane is 50 cars. Which of these pairs of points could be on the United States’ production possibilities frontier?

  a. (200 airplanes, 5,000 cars) and (150 airplanes, 4,000 cars)
  b. (200 airplanes, 12,500 cars) and (150 airplanes, 15,000 cars)
  c. (300 airplanes, 15,000 cars) and (200 airplanes, 25,000 cars)
  d. (300 airplanes, 25,000 cars) and (200 airplanes, 40,000 cars)

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   001.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

2. Assume for Brazil that the opportunity cost of each cashew is 100 peanuts. Which of these pairs of points could be on Brazil’s production possibilities frontier?

  a. (200 cashews, 30,000 peanuts) and (150 cashews, 35,000 peanuts)
  b. (200 cashews, 40,000 peanuts) and (150 cashews, 30,000 peanuts)
  c. (300 cashews, 60,000 peanut) and (200 cashews, 50,000 peanuts)
  d. (300 cashews, 60,000 peanuts) and (200 cashews, 80,000 peanuts)

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   002.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

3. What must be given up to obtain an item is called

  a. out-of-pocket cost.
  b. comparative worth.
  c. opportunity cost.
  d. absolute value.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Easy
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.302 – Identify the opportunity cost of an action.
TOPICS:   Economic thinking
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Knowledge
CUSTOM ID:   003.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

4. The opportunity cost of an item is

  a. the number of hours that one must work in order to buy one unit of the item.
  b. what you give up to get that item.
  c. always less than the dollar value of the item.
  d. always greater than the cost of producing the item.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Easy
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.302 – Identify the opportunity cost of an action.
TOPICS:   Economic thinking
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Knowledge
CUSTOM ID:   004.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

5. A farmer has the ability to grow either corn or cotton or some combination of the two. Given no other information, it follows that the farmer’s opportunity cost of a bushel of corn multiplied by his opportunity cost of a bushel of cotton

  a. is equal to 0.
  b. is between 0 and 1.
  c. is equal to 1.
  d. is greater than 1.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.302 – Identify the opportunity cost of an action.
TOPICS:   Economic thinking
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   005.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

6. If Korea is capable of producing either shoes or soccer balls or some combination of the two, then

  a. Korea should specialize in the product in which it has an absolute advantage.
  b. it would be impossible for Korea to have an absolute advantage over another country in both products.
  c. it would be difficult for Korea to benefit from trade with another country if Korea is efficient in the production of both goods.
  d. Korea’s opportunity cost of shoes is the inverse of its opportunity cost of soccer balls.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.302 – Identify the opportunity cost of an action.
TOPICS:   Economic thinking
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   006.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

7. Suppose a gardener produces both tomatoes and squash in his garden. If he must give up 8 bushels of squash to get 5 bushels of tomatoes, then his opportunity cost of 1 bushel of tomatoes is

  a. 0.63 bushels of squash.
  b. 1.6 bushels of squash.
  c. 3 bushels of squash.
  d. 5 bushels of squash.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.302 – Identify the opportunity cost of an action.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   007.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

8. Suppose a gardener produces both tomatoes and squash in his garden. If the opportunity cost of one bushel of squash is 2/5 bushel of tomatoes, then the opportunity cost of 1 bushel of tomatoes is

  a. 2/5 bushel of squash.
  b. 5/2 bushels of squash.
  c. 2 bushels of squash.
  d. 5 bushels of squash.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.302 – Identify the opportunity cost of an action.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   008.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

9. Ken and Traci are two woodworkers who both make tables and chairs. In one month, Ken can make 3 tables or 18 chairs, whereas Traci can make 8 tables or 24 chairs. Given this, we know that the opportunity cost of 1 chair is

  a. 1/6 table for Ken and 1/3 table for Traci.
  b. 1/6 table for Ken and 3 tables for Traci.
  c. 6 tables for Ken and 1/3 table for Traci.
  d. 6 tables for Ken and 3 tables for Traci.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.302 – Identify the opportunity cost of an action.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   009.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

10. Ken and Traci are two woodworkers who both make tables and chairs. In one month, Ken can make 3 tables or 18 chairs, whereas Traci can make 8 tables or 24 chairs. Given this, we know that the opportunity cost of 1 table is

  a. 1/6 chair for Ken and 1/3 chair for Traci.
  b. 1/6 chair for Ken and 3 chairs for Traci.
  c. 6 chairs for Ken and 1/3 chair for Traci.
  d. 6 chairs for Ken and 3 chairs for Traci.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.302 – Identify the opportunity cost of an action.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   010.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

11. If he devotes all of his available resources to cantaloupe production, a farmer can produce 120 cantaloupes. If he sacrifices 1.5 watermelons for each cantaloupe that he produces, it follows that

  a. if he devotes all of his available resources to watermelon production, then he can produce 80 watermelons.
  b. he cannot have a comparative advantage over other farmers in producing cantaloupes.
  c. his opportunity cost of one watermelon is 2/3 of a cantaloupe.
  d. his production possibilities frontier is bowed-out.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.302 – Identify the opportunity cost of an action.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   011.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

12. Absolute advantage is found by comparing different producers’

  a. opportunity costs.
  b. payments to land, labor, and capital.
  c. input requirements per unit of output.
  d. locational and logistical circumstances.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   012.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

13. The producer that requires a smaller quantity of inputs to produce a certain amount of a good, relative to the quantities of inputs required by other producers to produce the same amount of that good,

  a. has a low opportunity cost of producing that good, relative to the opportunity costs of other producers.
  b. has a comparative advantage in the production of that good.
  c. has an absolute advantage in the production of that good.
  d. should be the only producer of that good.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   013.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

14. If Shawn can produce more donuts in one day than Sue can produce in one day, then

  a. Shawn has a comparative advantage in the production of donuts.
  b. Sue has a comparative advantage in the production of donuts.
  c. Shawn has an absolute advantage in the production of donuts.
  d. Sue has an absolute advantage in the production of donuts.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   014.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

15. Ken and Traci are two woodworkers who both make tables and chairs. In one month, Ken can make 3 tables or 18 chairs, whereas Traci can make 8 tables or 24 chairs.. Given this, we know that

  a. Ken has an absolute advantage in chairs.
  b. Ken has a comparative advantage in tables.
  c. Traci has an absolute advantage in chairs.
  d. Traci has a comparative advantage in chairs.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   015.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

16. Travis can mow a lawn in two hours or he can trim a tree in one hour. Ricardo can mow a lawn in three hours or he can trim a tree in two hours.

  a. Travis has an absolute advantage over Ricardo in trimming trees.
  b. Travis has a comparative advantage over Ricardo in mowing lawns.
  c. Ricardo has a comparative advantage over Travis in trimming trees.
  d. All of the above are correct.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   016.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

17. Suppose Susan can wash three windows per hour or she can iron six shirts per hour. Paul can wash two windows per hour or he can iron five shirts per hour.

  a. Susan has an absolute advantage over Paul in washing windows.
  b. Susan has a comparative advantage over Paul in washing windows.
  c. Paul has a comparative advantage over Susan in ironing shirts.
  d. All of the above are correct.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   017.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

18. Suppose Jim and Tom can both produce two goods: baseball bats and hockey sticks. Which of the following is not possible?

  a. Jim has an absolute advantage in the production of baseball bats and in the production of hockey sticks.
  b. Jim has an absolute advantage in the production of baseball bats and a comparative advantage in the production of hockey sticks.
  c. Jim has an absolute advantage in the production of hockey sticks and a comparative advantage in the production of baseball bats.
  d. Jim has a comparative advantage in the production of baseball bats and in the production of hockey sticks.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   018.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

19. Kelly and David are both capable of repairing cars and cooking meals. Which of the following scenarios is not possible?

  a. Kelly has a comparative advantage in repairing cars and David has a comparative advantage in cooking meals.
  b. Kelly has an absolute advantage in repairing cars and David has an absolute advantage in cooking meals.
  c. Kelly has a comparative advantage in repairing cars and in cooking meals.
  d. David has an absolute advantage in repairing cars and in cooking meals.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   019.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

20. Suppose Jim and Tom can both produce baseball bats. If Jim’s opportunity cost of producing baseball bats is lower than Tom’s opportunity cost of producing baseball bats, then

  a. Tom must have an absolute advantage in the production of baseball bats.
  b. Jim must have an absolute advantage in the production of baseball bats.
  c. Tom has a comparative advantage in the production of baseball bats.
  d. Jim has a comparative advantage in the production of baseball bats.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   020.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

21. If Shawn can produce donuts at a lower opportunity cost than Sue, then

  a. Shawn has a comparative advantage in the production of donuts.
  b. Sue has a comparative advantage in the production of donuts.
  c. Shawn should not produce donuts.
  d. Shawn is capable of producing more donuts than Sue in a given amount of time.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   021.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

22. If Iowa’s opportunity cost of corn is lower than Oklahoma’s opportunity cost of corn, then

  a. Iowa has a comparative advantage in the production of corn.
  b. Iowa has an absolute advantage in the production of corn.
  c. Iowa should import corn from Oklahoma.
  d. Oklahoma should produce just enough corn to satisfy its own residents’ demands.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   022.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

23. Canada and the U.S. both produce wheat and computer software. Canada is said to have the comparative advantage in producing wheat if

  a. Canada requires fewer resources than the U.S. to produce a bushel of wheat.
  b. the opportunity cost of producing a bushel of wheat is lower for Canada than it is for the U.S.
  c. the opportunity cost of producing a bushel of wheat is lower for the U.S. than it is for Canada.
  d. the U.S. has an absolute advantage over Canada in producing computer software.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   023.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

24. Both Dave and Caroline produce sweaters and socks. If Dave’s opportunity cost of 1 sweater is 3 socks and Caroline’s opportunity cost of 1 sweater is 5 socks, then

  a. Dave has a comparative advantage in the production of sweaters.
  b. Caroline has a comparative advantage in the production of sweaters.
  c. Dave has a comparative advantage in the production of socks.
  d. Dave has a comparative advantage in the production of both sweaters and socks.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   024.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

25. Comparative advantage is related most closely to which of the following?

  a. output per hour
  b. opportunity cost
  c. efficiency
  d. bargaining strength in international trade

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   025.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

26. When describing the opportunity cost of two producers, economists use the term

  a. natural advantage.
  b. trading advantage.
  c. comparative advantage.
  d. absolute advantage.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Easy
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.302 – Identify the opportunity cost of an action.
TOPICS:   Economic thinking
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Knowledge
CUSTOM ID:   026.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

27. For two individuals who engage in the same two productive activities, it is impossible for one of the two individuals to

  a. have a comparative advantage in both activities.
  b. have an absolute advantage in both activities.
  c. be more productive per unit of time in both activities.
  d. gain from trade with each other.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   027.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

28. Two individuals engage in the same two productive activities. In which of the following circumstances would neither individual have a comparative advantage in either activity?

  a. One individual’s production possibilities frontier is steeper than the other individual’s production possibilities frontier.
  b. One individual is faster at both activities than the other individual.
  c. One individual’s opportunity costs are the same as the other individual’s opportunity costs.
  d. None of the above is correct; one of the two individuals always will have a comparative advantage in at least one of the two activities.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   028.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

29. Which of the following statements about comparative advantage is not true?

  a. Comparative advantage is determined by which person or group of persons can produce a given quantity of a good using the fewest resources.
  b. The principle of comparative advantage applies to countries as well as to individuals.
  c. Economists use the principle of comparative advantage to emphasize the potential benefits of free trade.
  d. A country may have a comparative advantage in producing a good, even though it lacks an absolute advantage in producing that good.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   029.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

30. The principle of comparative advantage does not provide answers to certain questions. One of those questions is

  a. Do specialization and trade benefit more than one party to a trade?
  b. Is it absolute advantage or comparative advantage that really matters?
  c. How are the gains from trade shared among the parties to a trade?
  d. Is it possible for specialization and trade to increase total output of traded goods?

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   030.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

31. The principle of comparative advantage does not provide answers to certain questions. One of those questions is

  a. Is it possible for specialization and trade to benefit more than one party to a trade?
  b. Is it possible for specialization and trade to increase total output of traded goods?
  c. Do opportunity costs play a role in people’s decisions to specialize in certain activities?
  d. What determines the price at which trade takes place?

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   031.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

32. Which of the following is not correct?

  a. The producer who requires a smaller quantity of inputs to produce a good is said to have an absolute advantage in producing that good.
  b. The producer who gives up less of other goods to produce Good X has the smaller opportunity cost of producing Good X.
  c. The producer who has the smaller opportunity cost of producing a good is said to have a comparative advantage in producing that good.
  d. The gains from specialization and trade are based not on comparative advantage but on absolute advantage.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Easy
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Knowledge
CUSTOM ID:   032.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

33. Suppose that a worker in Cornland can grow either 40 bushels of corn or 10 bushels of oats per year, and a worker in Oatland can grow either 20 bushels of corn or 5 bushels of oats per year. There are 20 workers in Cornland and 20 workers in Oatland. Which of the following statements is true?

  a. Both countries could gain from trade with each other.
  b. Neither country could gain from trade with each other because Cornland has an absolute advantage in both goods.
  c. Neither country could gain from trade with each other because neither one has a comparative advantage.
  d. Oatland could gain from trade between the two countries, but Cornland definitively would lose.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   033.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

34. Suppose that the country of Xenophobia chose to isolate itself from the rest of the world. Its ruler proclaimed that Xenophobia should become self-sufficient, so it would not engage in foreign trade. From an economic perspective, this idea would

  a. make sense if Xenophobia had an absolute advantage in all goods.
  b. make sense if Xenophobia had no absolute advantages in any good.
  c. not make sense as long as Xenophobia had a comparative advantage in some good.
  d. not make sense as long as Xenophobia had an absolute advantage in at least half the goods that could be traded.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   International trade
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   034.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

35. Specialization and trade are closely linked to

  a. absolute advantage.
  b. comparative advantage.
  c. gains to some traders that exactly offset losses to other traders.
  d. shrinkage of the economic pie.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.107 – Explain how comparative advantage leads to specialization.
TOPICS:   Economic thinking
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   035.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

36. When each person specializes in producing the good in which he or she has a comparative advantage, total production in the economy

  a. falls.
  b. stays the same.
  c. rises.
  d. may fall, rise, or stay the same.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Easy
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Knowledge
CUSTOM ID:   036.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

37. Total output in an economy increases when each person specializes because

  a. there is less competition for the same resources.
  b. each person spends more time producing that product in which he or she has a comparative advantage.
  c. a wider variety of products will be produced within each country due to specialization.
  d. government necessarily plays a larger role in the economy due to specialization.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.107 – Explain how comparative advantage leads to specialization.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   037.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

38. Which of the following statements is not correct?

  a. Trade allows for specialization.
  b. Trade has the potential to benefit all nations.
  c. Trade allows nations to consume outside of their production possibilities curves.
  d. Absolute advantage is the driving force of specialization.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.107 – Explain how comparative advantage leads to specialization.
TOPICS:   Economic thinking
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   038.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

39. Assume that Greece has a comparative advantage in fish and Germany has a comparative advantage in cars. Also assume that Germany has an absolute advantage in both fish and cars. If these two countries specialize and trade so as to maximize the benefits of specialization and trade, then

  a. the two countries’ combined output of both goods will be higher than it would be in the absence of trade.
  b. Greece will produce more fish than it would produce in the absence of trade.
  c. Germany will produce more cars than it would produce in the absence of trade.
  d. All of the above are correct.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   039.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

40. Suppose that a worker in Radioland can produce either 4 radios or 1 television per year and a worker in Teeveeland can produce either 2 radios or 5 televisions per year. Each nation has 100 workers, and each country specializes according to the principle of comparative advantage. If Radioland trades 100 televisions to Teeveeland in exchange for 100 radios each year, then each country’s maximum consumption of new radios and televisions per year will be

  a. higher than it would be in the absence of trade because of the gains from trade.
  b. the same as it would be in the absence of trade.
  c. less than it would be in the absence of trade because neither country is specializing in the product in which it has a comparative advantage.
  d. less than it would be in the absence of trade because Teeveeland has an absolute advantage in both goods and so it cannot benefit by trading with Radioland.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   040.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

41. Suppose that a worker in Radioland can produce either 4 radios or 1 television per year, and a worker in Teeveeland can produce either 2 radios or 4 televisions per year. Each nation has 100 workers. Also suppose that each country completely specializes in producing the good in which it has a comparative advantage. If Radioland trades 100 radios to Teeveeland in exchange for 100 televisions each year, then each country’s maximum consumption of new radios and televisions per year will be

  a. 100 radios, 300 televisions in Radioland and 300 radios, 100 televisions in Teeveeland.
  b. 300 radios, 100 televisions in Radioland and 100 radios, 300 televisions in Teeveeland.
  c. 200 radios, 100 televisions in Radioland and 100 radios, 200 televisions in Teeveeland.
  d. 300 radios, 100 televisions in Radioland and 100 radios, 400 televisions in Teeveeland.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   041.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

42. Suppose that a worker in Freedonia can produce either 6 units of corn or 2 units of wheat per year, and a worker in Sylvania can produce either 2 units of corn or 6 units of wheat per year. Each nation has 10 workers. Without trade, Freedonia produces and consumes 30 units of corn and 10 units of wheat per year. Sylvania produces and consumes 10 units of corn and 30 units of wheat. Suppose that trade is then initiated between the two countries, and Freedonia sends 30 units of corn to Sylvania in exchange for 30 units of wheat. Freedonia will now be able to consume a maximum of

  a. 30 units of corn and 30 units of wheat.
  b. 40 units of corn and 30 units of wheat.
  c. 40 units of corn and 20 units of wheat.
  d. 10 units of corn and 40 units of wheat.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   042.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

43. Suppose that a worker in Freedonia can produce either 6 units of corn or 2 units of wheat per year, and a worker in Sylvania can produce either 2 units of corn or 6 units of wheat per year. Each nation has 10 workers. Without trade, Freedonia produces and consumes 30 units of corn and 10 units of wheat per year. Sylvania produces and consumes 10 units of corn and 30 units of wheat. Suppose that trade is then initiated between the two countries, and Freedonia sends 30 units of corn to Sylvania in exchange for 30 units of wheat. Sylvania will now be able to consume a maximum of

  a. 30 units of corn and 30 units of wheat.
  b. 40 units of corn and 30 units of wheat.
  c. 40 units of corn and 20 units of wheat.
  d. 10 units of corn and 40 units of wheat.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   043.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

44. Suppose that a worker in Agland can produce either 10 units of organic grain or 2 units of incense per year, and a worker in Zenland can produce either 5 units of organic grain or 15 units of incense per year. There are 20 workers in Agland and 10 workers in Zenland. Currently the two countries do not trade. Agland produces and consumes 100 units of grain and 20 units of incense per year. Zenland produces and consumes 50 units of grain and no incense per year. If each country made the decision to specialize in producing the good in which it has a comparative advantage, then the combined yearly output of the two countries would increase by

  a. 30 units of grain and 100 units of incense.
  b. 30 units of grain and 150 units of incense.
  c. 50 units of grain and 90 units of incense.
  d. 50 units of grain and 130 units of incense.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   044.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

45. Suppose that a worker in Cornland can grow either 40 bushels of corn or 10 bushels of oats per year, and a worker in Oatland can grow either 5 bushels of corn or 50 bushels of oats per year. There are 20 workers in Cornland and 20 workers in Oatland. If the two countries do not trade, Cornland will produce and consume 400 bushels of corn and 100 bushels of oats, while Oatland will produce and consume 60 bushels of corn and 400 bushels of oats. If each country made the decision to specialize in producing the good in which it has a comparative advantage, then the combined yearly output of the two countries would increase by

  a. 280 bushels of corn and 450 bushels of oats.
  b. 340 bushels of corn and 500 bushels of oats.
  c. 360 bushels of corn and 520 bushels of oats.
  d. 360 bushels of corn and 640 bushels of oats.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   045.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

46. Suppose that a worker in Freedonia can produce either 6 units of corn or 2 units of wheat per year, and a worker in Sylvania can produce either 2 units of corn or 6 units of wheat per year. Each nation has 10 workers. For many years the two countries traded, each completely specializing according to their respective comparative advantages. Now, however, war has broken out between them and all trade has stopped. Without trade, Freedonia produces and consumes 30 units of corn and 10 units of wheat per year. Sylvania produces and consumes 10 units of corn and 30 units of wheat. The war has caused the combined yearly output of the two countries to decline by

  a. 10 units of corn and 10 units of wheat.
  b. 20 units of corn and 20 units of wheat.
  c. 30 units of corn and 30 units of wheat.
  d. 40 units of corn and 40 units of wheat.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   046.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

47. Suppose that a worker in Caninia can produce either 2 blankets or 8 meals per day, and a worker in Felinia can produce either 5 blankets or 1 meal per day. Each nation has 10 workers. For many years, the two countries traded, each completely specializing according to their respective comparative advantages. Now war has broken out between them and all trade has stopped. Without trade, Caninia produces and consumes 10 blankets and 40 meals per day and Felinia produces and consumes 25 blankets and 5 meals per day. The war has caused the combined daily output of the two countries to decline by

  a. 15 blankets and 35 meals.
  b. 25 blankets and 40 meals.
  c. 35 blankets and 45 meals.
  d. 50 blankets and 80 meals.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   047.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

48. A person can benefit from specialization and trade by obtaining a good at a price that is

  a. lower than his or her opportunity cost of that good.
  b. the same as his or her opportunity cost of that good.
  c. higher than his or her opportunity cost of that good.
  d. different than his or her opportunity cost of that good.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Easy
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.107 – Explain how comparative advantage leads to specialization.
TOPICS:   International trade
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Knowledge
CUSTOM ID:   048.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

49. The gains from trade are

  a. evident in economic models, but seldom observed in the real world.
  b. evident in the real world, but impossible to capture in economic models.
  c. a result of more efficient resource allocation than would be observed in the absence of trade.
  d. based on the principle of absolute advantage.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   International trade
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   049.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

50. Trade can make everybody better off because it

  a. increases cooperation among nations.
  b. allows people to specialize according to comparative advantage.
  c. requires some workers in an economy to be retrained.
  d. reduces competition among domestic companies.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   International trade
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   050.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

51. If labor in Mexico is less productive than labor in the United States in all areas of production,

  a. then neither nation can benefit from trade.
  b. then Mexico can benefit from trade but the United States cannot.
  c. then the United States will have a comparative advantage relative to Mexico in the production of all goods.
  d. then both Mexico and the United States still can benefit from trade.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   051.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-20

Assume that Brad and Theresa can switch between producing wheat and producing beef at a constant rate.

  Minutes Needed to Make 1
Bushel of Wheat Pound of Beef
Brad 10 12
Theresa 6 10

 

52. Refer to Table 3-20. What is Brad’s opportunity cost of producing one pound of beef?

  a. 5/6 bushel of wheat
  b. 6/5 bushels of wheat
  c. 3/5 bushels of wheat
  d. 5/3 bushels of wheat

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   052.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

53. Refer to Table 3-20. What is Brad’s opportunity cost of producing one bushel of wheat?

  a. 5/6 pound of beef
  b. 6/5 pounds of beef
  c. 3/5 pounds of beef
  d. 5/3 pounds of beef

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   053.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

54. Refer to Table 3-20. What is Theresa’s opportunity cost of producing one bushel of wheat?

  a. 5/6 pound of beef
  b. 6/5 pound of beef
  c. 3/5 pound of beef
  d. 5/3 pounds of beef

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   054.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

55. Refer to Table 3-20. What is Theresa’s opportunity cost of producing one pound of beef?

  a. 5/6 bushel of wheat
  b. 6/5 bushel of wheat
  c. 3/5 bushel of wheat
  d. 5/3 bushels of wheat

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   055.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

56. Refer to Table 3-20. Brad has an absolute advantage in the production of

  a. wheat and Theresa has an absolute advantage in the production of beef.
  b. beef and Theresa has an absolute advantage in the production of wheat.
  c. both goods and Theresa has an absolute advantage in the production of neither good.
  d. neither good and Theresa has an absolute advantage in the production of both goods.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   056.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

57. Refer to Table 3-20. Brad has a comparative advantage in the production of

  a. wheat and Theresa has a comparative advantage in the production of beef.
  b. beef and Theresa has a comparative advantage in the production of wheat.
  c. both goods and Theresa has a comparative advantage in the production of neither good.
  d. neither good and Theresa has a comparative advantage in the production of both goods.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   057.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

58. Refer to Table 3-20. Brad should specialize in the production of

  a. wheat and Theresa should specialize in the production of beef.
  b. beef and Theresa should specialize in the production of wheat.
  c. both goods and Theresa should specialize in the production of neither good.
  d. neither good and Theresa should specialize in the production of both goods.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   058.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

59. Refer to Table 3-20. Assume that Brad and Theresa each has 60 minutes available. If each person spends all his or her time producing the good in which he or she has a comparative advantage, then total production is

  a. 6 bushels of wheat and 6 pounds of beef.
  b. 10 bushels of wheat and 5 pounds of beef.
  c. 10 bushels of wheat and 6 pounds of beef.
  d. 6 bushels of wheat and 5 pounds of beef.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.037 – Construct a production possibilities frontier.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   059.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

60. Refer to Table 3-20. At which of the following prices would both Brad and Theresa gain from trade with each other?

  a. 12 bushels of wheat for 6 pounds of beef
  b. 12 bushels of wheat for 8 pounds of beef
  c. 12 bushels of wheat for 12 pounds of beef
  d. Brad and Theresa could not both gain from trade with each other at any price.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   International trade
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   060.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-21

Assume that Jamaica and Norway can switch between producing coolers and producing radios at a constant rate. The following table shows the number of coolers or number of radios each country can produce in one day.

  Output Produced in One Day
Coolers Radios
Jamaica 12 6
Norway 24 3

 

61. Refer to Table 3-21. Jamaica’s opportunity cost of one cooler is

  a. 0.5 radios, and Norway’s opportunity cost of one cooler is 0.125 radios.
  b. 0.5 radios, and Norway’s opportunity cost of one cooler is 8 radios.
  c. 2 radios, and Norway’s opportunity cost of one cooler is 0.125 radios.
  d. 2 radios, and Norway’s opportunity cost of one cooler is 8 radios.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   061.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

62. Refer to Table 3-21. Suppose Jamaica decides to increase its production of radios by 12. What is the opportunity cost of this decision?

  a. 3 coolers
  b. 6 coolers
  c. 12 coolers
  d. 24 coolers

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   062.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

63. Refer to Table 3-21. Jamaica has an absolute advantage in the production of

  a. coolers and Norway has an absolute advantage in the production of radios.
  b. radios and Norway has an absolute advantage in the production of coolers.
  c. both goods and Norway has an absolute advantage in the production of neither good.
  d. neither good and Norway has an absolute advantage in the production of both goods.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   063.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

64. Refer to Table 3-21. Jamaica has a comparative advantage in the production of

  a. coolers and Norway has a comparative advantage in the production of radios.
  b. radios and Norway has a comparative advantage in the production of coolers.
  c. both goods and Norway has a comparative advantage in the production of neither good.
  d. neither good and Norway has a comparative advantage in the production of both goods.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   064.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

65. Refer to Table 3-21. Jamaica should specialize in the production of

  a. coolers and Norway should specialize in the production of radios.
  b. radios and Norway should specialize in the production of coolers.
  c. both goods and Norway should specialize in the production of neither good.
  d. neither good and Norway should specialize in the production of both goods.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   065.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

66. Refer to Table 3-21. Assume that Jamaica and Norway each has 4 days available for production. Originally, each country divided its time equally between the production of coolers and radios. Now, each country spends all its time producing the good in which it has a comparative advantage. As a result, the total output of coolers increased by

  a. 12.
  b. 24.
  c. 36.
  d. 48.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   066.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

67. Refer to Table 3-21. Assume that Jamaica and Norway each has 4 days available for production. Originally, each country divided its time equally between the production of coolers and radios. Now, each country spends all its time producing the good in which it has a comparative advantage. As a result, the total output of radios increased by

  a. 3.
  b. 6.
  c. 9.
  d. 12.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   067.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

68. Refer to Table 3-21. At which of the following prices would both Jamaica and Norway gain from trade with each other?

  a. 1 radio for 1 cooler
  b. 1 radio for 4 coolers
  c. 1 radio for 10 coolers
  d. Jamaica and Norway would both gain from trade at all of the above prices.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.084 – Determine which terms of trade allow two countries with differing productivity levels to gain from trade.
TOPICS:   International trade
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   068.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

69. Refer to Table 3-21. Jamaica and Norway would not be able to gain from trade if Norway’s opportunity cost of one radio changed to

  a. 0 coolers.
  b. 1 cooler.
  c. 2 coolers.
  d. Jamaica and Norway can always gain from trade regardless of their opportunity costs.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.084 – Determine which terms of trade allow two countries with differing productivity levels to gain from trade.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   069.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-22

Assume that Zimbabwe and Portugal can switch between producing toothbrushes and producing hairbrushes at a constant rate.

  Machine Minutes
Needed to Make 1
Toothbrush Hairbrush
Zimbabwe 3 10
Portugal 5 6

 

70. Refer to Table 3-22. Zimbabwe’s opportunity cost of one hairbrush is

  a. 3/10 toothbrush and Portugal’s opportunity cost of one hairbrush is 5/6 toothbrush.
  b. 3/10 toothbrush and Portugal’s opportunity cost of one hairbrush is 6/5 toothbrushes.
  c. 10/3 toothbrushes and Portugal’s opportunity cost of one hairbrush is 5/6 toothbrush.
  d. 10/3 toothbrushes and Portugal’s opportunity cost of one hairbrush is 6/5 toothbrushes.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   070.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

71. Refer to Table 3-22. Suppose Zimbabwe decides to increase its production of toothbrushes by 10. What is the opportunity cost of this decision?

  a. 0.3 hairbrush
  b. 3 hairbrushes
  c. 30 hairbrushes
  d. 100 hairbrushes

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   071.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

72. Refer to Table 3-22. Zimbabwe has an absolute advantage in the production of

  a. toothbrushes and a comparative advantage in the production of toothbrushes.
  b. toothbrushes and a comparative advantage in the production of hairbrushes.
  c. hairbrushes and a comparative advantage in the production of toothbrushes.
  d. hairbrushes and a comparative advantage in the production of hairbrushes.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   072.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

73. Refer to Table 3-22. Portugal has an absolute advantage in the production of

  a. toothbrushes and a comparative advantage in the production of toothbrushes.
  b. toothbrushes and a comparative advantage in the production of hairbrushes.
  c. hairbrushes and a comparative advantage in the production of toothbrushes.
  d. hairbrushes and a comparative advantage in the production of hairbrushes.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   073.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

74. Refer to Table 3-22. Assume that Zimbabwe and Portugal each has 60 machine minutes available. Originally, each country divided its time equally between the production of toothbrushes and hairbrushes. Now, each country spends all its time producing the good in which it has a comparative advantage. As a result, the total output increased by

  a. 4 toothbrushes and 2 hairbrushes.
  b. 10 toothbrushes and 5 hairbrushes.
  c. 16 toothbrushes and 8 hairbrushes.
  d. 20 toothbrushes and 10 hairbrushes.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   074.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

75. Refer to Table 3-22. Zimbabwe and Portugal would not be able to gain from trade if Zimbabwe’s opportunity cost of one toothbrush changed to

  a. 0 hairbrushes.
  b. 5/6 hairbrushes.
  c. 6/5 hairbrushes.
  d. Zimbabwe and Portugal can always gain from trade regardless of their opportunity costs.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.084 – Determine which terms of trade allow two countries with differing productivity levels to gain from trade.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   075.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-23

Assume that the farmer and the rancher can switch between producing pork and producing tomatoes at a constant rate.

   Labor Hours Needed to Make 1 Pound of  Pounds Produced in 24 Hours
 Pork Tomatoes Pork Tomatoes
 Farmer 6 3 4 8
 Rancher 4 4 6 6

 

 

 

76. Refer to Table 3-23. The opportunity cost of 1 pound of pork for the farmer is

  a. 1/2 pound of tomatoes.
  b. 1/2 hour of labor.
  c. 2 pounds of tomatoes.
  d. 2 hours of labor.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   076.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

77. Refer to Table 3-23. The opportunity cost of 1 pound of pork for the rancher is

  a. 1 pound of tomatoes.
  b. 1 hour of labor.
  c. 1.5 pounds of tomatoes.
  d. 1.5 hours of labor.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   077.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

78. Refer to Table 3-23. The opportunity cost of 1 pound of tomatoes for the farmer is

  a. 1/2 pound of pork.
  b. 2 hours of labor.
  c. 2 pounds of pork.
  d. 4 hours of labor.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   078.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

79. Refer to Table 3-23. The opportunity cost of 1 pound of tomatoes for the rancher is

  a. 1 pound of pork.
  b. 1 hour of labor.
  c. 1.5 pounds of pork.
  d. 1.5 hours of labor.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   079.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

80. Refer to Table 3-23. The farmer has an absolute advantage in the production of

  a. pork.
  b. tomatoes.
  c. both goods.
  d. neither good.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   080.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

81. Refer to Table 3-23. The rancher has an absolute advantage in the production of

  a. pork.
  b. tomatoes.
  c. both goods.
  d. neither good.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   081.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

82. Refer to Table 3-23. The farmer has a comparative advantage in the production of

  a. pork.
  b. tomatoes.
  c. both goods.
  d. neither good.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   082.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

83. Refer to Table 3-23. The rancher has a comparative advantage in the production of

  a. pork.
  b. tomatoes.
  c. both goods.
  d. neither good.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   083.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

84. Refer to Table 3-23. The farmer should specialize in the production of

  a. pork and the rancher should specialize in the production of tomatoes.
  b. tomatoes and the rancher should specialize in the production of pork.
  c. both goods and the rancher should specialize in the production of neither good.
  d. neither good and the rancher should specialize in the production of both goods.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   084.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

85. Refer to Table 3-23. Assume that the farmer and the rancher each has 24 labor hours available. If each person spends all his time producing the good in which he has a comparative advantage, then total production is

  a. 4 pounds of pork and 6 pounds of tomatoes.
  b. 6 pounds of pork and 8 pounds of tomatoes.
  c. 4 pounds of pork and 8 pounds of tomatoes.
  d. 6 pounds of pork and 6 pounds of tomatoes.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   085.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

86. Refer to Table 3-23. Assume that the farmer and the rancher each has 24 labor hours available. If each person spends all his time producing the good in which he has a comparative advantage and trade takes place at a price of 1 pound of pork for 2 pounds of tomatoes, then

  a. the farmer and the rancher will both gain from this trade.
  b. the farmer will gain from this trade, but the rancher will not.
  c. the rancher will gain from this trade, but the farmer will not.
  d. neither the farmer nor the rancher will gain from this trade.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   086.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

87. Refer to Table 3-23. Without trade, the farmer produced and consumed 2 pounds of pork and 4 pounds of tomatoes and the rancher produced and consumed 4 pounds of pork and 2 pounds of tomatoes. Then, each person agreed to specialize in the production of the good in which he has a comparative advantage and trade 4 pounds of pork for 6 pounds of tomatoes. As a result,

  a. the farmer gained 3 hours worth of production and the rancher gained 4 hours worth of production.
  b. the farmer gained 4 hours worth of production and the rancher gained 6 hours worth of production.
  c. the farmer gained 6 hours worth of production and the rancher gained 8 hours worth of production.
  d. the farmer gained 8 hours worth of production and the rancher gained 10 hours worth of production.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   087.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-24

Assume that England and Spain can switch between producing cheese and producing bread at a constant rate.

 

  Labor Hours Needed to Make 1 Unit of Number of Units Produced in 40 Hours
 Cheese Bread Cheese Bread
 England  1 4 40 10
 Spain  4 8 10 5

 

88. Refer to Table 3-24. The opportunity cost of 1 unit of cheese for England is

  a. 1/4 unit of bread.
  b. 1 hour of labor.
  c. 4 units of bread.
  d. 4 hours of labor.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   088.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

89. Refer to Table 3-24. The opportunity cost of 1 unit of cheese for Spain is

  a. 1/2 unit of bread.
  b. 2 hours of labor.
  c. 2 units of bread.
  d. 4 hours of labor.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   089.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

90. Refer to Table 3-24. The opportunity cost of 1 unit of bread for England is

  a. 1/4 unit of cheese.
  b. 1/4 hour of labor.
  c. 4 units of cheese.
  d. 4 hours of labor.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   090.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

91. Refer to Table 3-24. The opportunity cost of 1 unit of bread for Spain is

  a. 1/2 unit of cheese.
  b. 1/2 hour of labor.
  c. 2 units of cheese.
  d. 8 hours of labor.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   091.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

92. Refer to Table 3-24. England has an absolute advantage in the production of

  a. cheese and Spain has an absolute advantage in the production of bread.
  b. bread and Spain has an absolute advantage in the production of cheese.
  c. both goods and Spain has an absolute advantage in the production of neither good.
  d. neither good and Spain has an absolute advantage in the production of both goods.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   092.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

93. Refer to Table 3-24. England has a comparative advantage in the production of

  a. cheese and Spain has a comparative advantage in the production of bread.
  b. bread and Spain has a comparative advantage in the production of cheese.
  c. both goods and Spain has a comparative advantage in the production of neither good.
  d. neither good and Spain has a comparative advantage in the production of both goods.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   093.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

94. Refer to Table 3-24. England should specialize in the production of

  a. cheese and Spain should specialize in the production of bread.
  b. bread and Spain should specialize in the production of cheese.
  c. both goods and Spain should specialize in the production of neither good.
  d. neither good and Spain should specialize in the production of both goods.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   094.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

95. Refer to Table 3-24. Assume that England and Spain each has 40 labor hours available. Originally, each country divided its time equally between the production of cheese and bread. Now, each country spends all its time producing the good in which it has a comparative advantage. As a result, the total output of cheese increased by

  a. 15.
  b. 20.
  c. 25.
  d. 40.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Efficiency
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   095.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

96. Refer to Table 3-24. At which of the following prices would both England and Spain gain from trade with each other?

  a. 16 units of bread for 16 units of cheese
  b. 16 units of bread for 24 units of cheese
  c. 16 units of bread for 48 units of cheese
  d. England and Spain could not both gain from trade with each other at any price.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.084 – Determine which terms of trade allow two countries with differing productivity levels to gain from trade.
TOPICS:   International trade
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   096.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

97. Refer to Table 3-24. If England and Spain each spends all its time producing the good in which it has a comparative advantage and the countries agree to trade 2 units of bread for 6 units of cheese, then England will consume

  a. 34 units of cheese and 2 units of bread and Spain will consume 6 units of cheese and 3 units of bread.
  b. 34 units of cheese and 2 units of bread and Spain will consume 16 units of cheese and 3 units of bread.
  c. 34 units of cheese and 12 units of bread and Spain will consume 6 units of cheese and 3 units of bread.
  d. 34 units of cheese and 12 units of bread and Spain will consume 16 units of cheese and 3 units of bread.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   097.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

98. Refer to Table 3-24. Without trade, England produced and consumed 32 units of cheese and 2 units of bread and Spain produced and consumed 6 units of cheese and 2 units of bread. Then, each country agreed to specialize in the production of the good in which it has a comparative advantage and trade 7 units of cheese for 2.5 units of bread. As a result, England gained

  a. 0 units of cheese and 0.5 unit of bread and Spain gained 1 unit of cheese and 0.5 unit of bread.
  b. 1 unit of cheese and 0.5 unit of bread and Spain gained 1 unit of cheese and 0.5 unit of bread.
  c. 7 units of cheese and 2.5 units of bread and Spain gained 7 units of cheese and 2.5 units of bread.
  d. 33 units of cheese and 2.5 units of bread and Spain gained 7 units of cheese and 2.5 units of bread.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   098.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-25

Assume that Maya and Miguel can switch between producing mixers and producing toasters at a constant rate.

   Hours Needed to Make 1 Amount Produced in 40 Hours
 mixer toaster mixers toasters
Maya 8 5 5 8
Miguel 20 10 2 4

 

99. Refer to Table 3-25. The opportunity cost of 1 mixer for Maya is

  a. 0.625 toasters.
  b. 5 hours of labor.
  c. 1.6 toasters.
  d. 20 hours of labor.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   099.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

100. Refer to Table 3-25. The opportunity cost of 1 mixer for Miguel is

  a. 1/2 toaster.
  b. 1/2 hour of labor.
  c. 2 toasters.
  d. 8 hours of labor.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   100.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

101. Refer to Table 3-25. The opportunity cost of 1 toaster for Maya is

  a. 0.625 mixers.
  b. 1.6 hours of labor.
  c. 1.6 mixers.
  d. 8 hours of labor.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   101.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

102. Refer to Table 3-25. The opportunity cost of 1 toaster for Miguel is

  a. 1/2 mixer.
  b. 2 hours of labor.
  c. 2 mixers.
  d. 20 hours of labor.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   102.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

103. Refer to Table 3-25. Maya has an absolute advantage in the production of

  a. both goods and a comparative advantage in the production of mixers.
  b. both goods and a comparative advantage in the production of toasters.
  c. neither good and a comparative advantage in the production of mixers.
  d. neither good and a comparative advantage in the production of toasters.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   103.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

104. Refer to Table 3-25. Miguel has an absolute advantage in the production of

  a. both goods and a comparative advantage in the production of mixers.
  b. both goods and a comparative advantage in the production of toasters.
  c. neither good and a comparative advantage in the production of mixers.
  d. neither good and a comparative advantage in the production of toasters.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   104.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

105. Refer to Table 3-25. Maya should specialize in the production of

  a. mixers and Miguel should specialize in the production of toasters.
  b. toasters and Miguel should specialize in the production of mixers.
  c. both goods and Miguel should specialize in the production of neither good.
  d. neither good and Miguel should specialize in the production of both goods.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   105.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

106. Refer to Table 3-25. At which of the following prices would both Maya and Miguel gain from trade with each other?

  a. 4 mixers for 7 toasters
  b. 8 mixers for 10 toasters
  c. 12 mixers for 18 toasters
  d. Maya and Miguel could not both gain from trade with each other at any price.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.084 – Determine which terms of trade allow two countries with differing productivity levels to gain from trade.
TOPICS:   International trade
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   106.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-26

Assume that Japan and Korea can switch between producing cars and producing airplanes at a constant rate.

   Hours Needed to Make 1 Quantity Produced in 2400 Hours
Car Airplane Cars Airplanes
Japan 30 150 80 16
Korea 50 150 48 16

 

107. Refer to Table 3-26. Japan’s opportunity cost of one airplane is

  a. 1/5 car and Korea’s opportunity cost of one airplane is 1/3 car.
  b. 1/5 car and Korea’s opportunity cost of one airplane is 3 cars.
  c. 5 cars and Korea’s opportunity cost of one airplane is 1/3 car.
  d. 5 cars and Korea’s opportunity cost of one airplane is 3 cars.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   107.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

108. Refer to Table 3-26. Japan’s opportunity cost of one car is

  a. 1/5 airplane and Korea’s opportunity cost of one car is 1/3 airplane.
  b. 1/5 airplane and Korea’s opportunity cost of one car is 3 airplanes.
  c. 5 airplanes and Korea’s opportunity cost of one car is 1/3 airplane.
  d. 5 airplanes and Korea’s opportunity cost of one car is 3 airplanes.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   108.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

109. Refer to Table 3-26. Suppose Japan decides to increase its production of cars by 45. What is the opportunity cost of this decision?

  a. 9 airplanes
  b. 15 airplanes
  c. 135 airplanes
  d. 225 airplanes

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   109.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

110. Refer to Table 3-26. Suppose Korea decides to increase its production of cars by 18. What is the opportunity cost of this decision?

  a. 3 airplanes
  b. 6 airplanes
  c. 16 airplanes
  d. 150 airplanes

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   110.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

111. Refer to Table 3-26. Japan has an absolute advantage in the production of

  a. cars and a comparative advantage in the production of cars.
  b. cars and a comparative advantage in the production of airplanes.
  c. neither good and a comparative advantage in the production of cars.
  d. neither good and a comparative advantage in the production of airplanes.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   111.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

112. Refer to Table 3-26. Korea has an absolute advantage in the production of

  a. cars and a comparative advantage in the production of cars.
  b. cars and a comparative advantage in the production of airplanes.
  c. neither good and a comparative advantage in the production of cars.
  d. neither good and a comparative advantage in the production of airplanes.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   112.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

113. Refer to Table 3-26. Assume that Japan and Korea each has 2400 hours available. Originally, each country divided its time equally between the production of cars and airplanes. Now, each country spends all its time producing the good in which it has a comparative advantage. As a result, the total output of cars increased by

  a. 16.
  b. 40.
  c. 64.
  d. 80.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   113.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

114. Refer to Table 3-26. Japan and Korea would not be able to gain from trade if Korea’s opportunity cost of one car changed to

  a. 1/5 airplane.
  b. 1/3 airplane.
  c. 3 airplanes.
  d. 5 airplanes.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   114.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

115. Refer to Table 3-26. Assume that Japan and Korea each has 2400 hours available. If each country spends all its time producing the good in which it has a comparative advantage and trade takes place at a price of 12 cars for 6 airplanes, then

  a. Japan and Korea will both gain from this trade.
  b. Japan will gain from this trade, but Korea will not.
  c. Korea will gain from this trade, but Japan will not.
  d. neither Japan nor Korea will gain from this trade.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   115.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

116. Refer to Table 3-26. Without trade, Japan produced and consumed 50 cars and 6 airplanes and Korea produced and consumed 27 cars and 7 airplanes. Then, each country agreed to specialize in the production of the good in which it has a comparative advantage and trade 28 cars for 8 airplanes. As a result, Japan gained

  a. 0 cars and 2 airplanes and Korea gained 1 car and 1 airplane.
  b. 2 cars and 2 airplanes and Korea gained 1 car and 1 airplane.
  c. 28 cars and 8 airplanes and Korea gained 28 cars and 8 airplanes.
  d. 52 cars and 8 airplanes and Korea gained 28 cars and 8 airplanes.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   116.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-27

Assume that Huang and Min can switch between producing parasols and producing porcelain plates at a constant rate.

   Labor Hours Needed to Make 1 Quantity Produced in 36 Hours
 Parasol Plate Parasol Plate
Huang 2 6 18 6
Min 2 4 18 9

 

117. Refer to Table 3-27. The opportunity cost of 1 parasol for Huang is

  a. 1/3 plate.
  b. 1/2 plate.
  c. 3 plates.
  d. 6 plates.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   117.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

118. Refer to Table 3-27. The opportunity cost of 1 parasol for Min is

  a. 1/3 plate.
  b. 1/2 plate.
  c. 2 plates.
  d. 3 plates.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   118.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

119. Refer to Table 3-27. The opportunity cost of 1 plate for Huang is

  a. 1/3 parasol.
  b. 1/2 parasol.
  c. 3 parasols.
  d. 4 parasols.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   119.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

120. Refer to Table 3-27. The opportunity cost of 1 plate for Min is

  a. 1/3 parasol.
  b. 1/2 parasol.
  c. 2 parasols.
  d. 3 parasols.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   120.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

121. Refer to Table 3-27. Huang has an absolute advantage in the production of

  a. parasols and a comparative advantage in the production of parasols.
  b. parasols and a comparative advantage in the production of plates.
  c. neither good and a comparative advantage in the production of parasols.
  d. neither good and a comparative advantage in the production of plates.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   121.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

122. Refer to Table 3-27. Min has an absolute advantage in the production of

  a. plates and a comparative advantage in the production of plates.
  b. parasols and a comparative advantage in the production of plates.
  c. neither good and a comparative advantage in the production of parasols.
  d. neither good and a comparative advantage in the production of plates.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   122.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

123. Refer to Table 3-27. Assume that Huang and Min each has 36 labor hours available. Originally, each person divided his/her time equally between the production of parasols and plates. Now, each person spends all their time producing the good in which they have a comparative advantage. As a result, the total output of plates increased by

  a. 0.
  b. 1.5.
  c. 3.
  d. 9.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   123.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

124. Refer to Table 3-27. At which of the following prices would both Huang and Min gain from trade with each other?

  a. 15 parasols for 10 plates
  b. 15 parasols for 6 plates
  c. 15 parasols for 3 plates
  d. Huang and Min could not both gain from trade with each other at any price.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.084 – Determine which terms of trade allow two countries with differing productivity levels to gain from trade.
TOPICS:   International trade
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   124.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-28

Barb and Jim run a business that sets up and tests computers. Assume that Barb and Jim can switch between setting up and testing computers at a constant rate. The following table applies.

   Minutes Needed to  Number of Computers Set Up or Tested in a 40-Hour Week
 Set Up 1 Computer Test 1 Computer Computers Set Up Computers Tested
Barb 48 ? 50 40
Jim 30 40 80 60

 

125. Refer to Table 3-28. Barb’s opportunity cost of setting up one computer is testing

  a. 4/5 computer and Jim’s opportunity cost of setting up one computer is testing 3/4 computer.
  b. 4/5 computer and Jim’s opportunity cost of setting up one computer is testing 4/3 computers.
  c. 5/4 computers and Jim’s opportunity cost of setting up one computer is testing 3/4 computer.
  d. 5/4 computers and Jim’s opportunity cost of setting up one computer is testing 4/3 computers.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   125.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

126. Refer to Table 3-28. Barb’s opportunity cost of testing one computer is setting up

  a. 4/5 computer and Jim’s opportunity cost of testing one computer is setting up 3/4 computer.
  b. 4/5 computer and Jim’s opportunity cost of testing one computer is setting up 4/3 computers.
  c. 5/4 computers and Jim’s opportunity cost of testing one computer is setting up 3/4 computer.
  d. 5/4 computers and Jim’s opportunity cost of testing one computer is setting up 4/3 computers.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   126.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

127. Refer to Table 3-28. Barb has an absolute advantage in

  a. both setting up and testing computers and a comparative advantage in setting up computers.
  b. both setting up and testing computers and a comparative advantage in testing computers.
  c. neither setting up nor testing computers and a comparative advantage in setting up computers.
  d. neither setting up nor testing computers and a comparative advantage in testing computers.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   127.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

128. Refer to Table 3-28. Jim has an absolute advantage in

  a. both setting up and testing computers and a comparative advantage in setting up computers.
  b. both setting up and testing computers and a comparative advantage in testing computers.
  c. neither setting up nor testing computers and a comparative advantage in setting up computers.
  d. neither setting up nor testing computers and a comparative advantage in testing computers.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   128.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-29

Juanita and Shantala run a business that programs and tests cellular phones. Assume that Juanita and Shantala can switch between programming and testing cellular phones at a constant rate. The following table applies.

   Minutes Needed to  Number of Cellular Phones Programmed or Tested in a 40-Hour Week
 Program 1 Cellular Phone Test 1 Cellular Phone Cellular Phones Programmed Cellular Phones Tested
Juanita  ? 2 160 1200
Shantala 10 4 240 600

 

129. Refer to Table 3-29. Juanita has an absolute advantage in

  a. programming cellular phones and a comparative advantage in programming cellular phones.
  b. programming cellular phones and a comparative advantage in testing cellular phones.
  c. testing cellular phones and a comparative advantage in programming cellular phones.
  d. testing cellular phones and a comparative advantage in testing cellular phones.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   129.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

130. Refer to Table 3-29. Juanita’s opportunity cost of programming one cellular phone is testing

  a. 7.5 cellular phones and Shantala’s opportunity cost of programming one cellular phone is testing 5/2 cellular phones.
  b. 2/15 cellular phones and Shantala’s opportunity cost of programming one cellular phone is testing 5/2 cellular phones.
  c. 7.5 cellular phones and Shantala’s opportunity cost of programming one cellular phone is testing 2/5 cellular phones.
  d. 2/15 cellular phones and Shantala’s opportunity cost of programming one cellular phone is testing 2/5 cellular phones.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   130.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

131. Refer to Table 3-29. Juanita’s opportunity cost of testing one cellular phone is programming

  a. 0.133 cellular phones and Shantala’s opportunity cost of testing one cellular phone is programming 2.5 cellular phones.
  b. 0.133 cellular phones and Shantala’s opportunity cost of testing one cellular phone is programming 0.4 cellular phones.
  c. 7.5 cellular phones and Shantala’s opportunity cost of testing one cellular phone is programming 2.5 cellular phones.
  d. 7.5 cellular phones and Shantala’s opportunity cost of testing one cellular phone is programming 0.4 cellular phones.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   131.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

132. Refer to Table 3-29. Shantala has an absolute advantage in

  a. programming cellular phones and a comparative advantage in programming cellular phones.
  b. programming cellular phones and a comparative advantage in testing cellular phones.
  c. testing cellular phones and a comparative advantage in programming cellular phones.
  d. testing cellular phones and a comparative advantage in testing cellular phones.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   132.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-30

Assume that Falda and Varick can switch between producing wheat and producing cloth at a constant rate.

  Quantity Produced in 1 Hour
Bushels of Wheat Yards of Cloth
Falda 8 12
Varick 6 15

 

133. Refer to Table 3-30. Falda has an absolute advantage in the production of

  a. wheat.
  b. cloth.
  c. both goods.
  d. neither good.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   133.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

134. Refer to Table 3-30. Varick has an absolute advantage in the production of

  a. wheat.
  b. cloth.
  c. both goods.
  d. neither good.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   134.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

135. Refer to Table 3-30. Falda has a comparative advantage in the production of

  a. wheat.
  b. cloth.
  c. both goods.
  d. neither good.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   135.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

136. Refer to Table 3-30. Varick has a comparative advantage in the production of

  a. wheat.
  b. cloth.
  c. both goods.
  d. neither good.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   136.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

Figure 3-13

Peru’s Production Possibilities Frontier

 

137. Refer to Figure 3-13. Suppose Peru decides to increase its production of rubies by 30. What is the opportunity cost of this decision?

  a. 1/8 emerald
  b. 1/3 emerald
  c. 1 emerald
  d. 3 emeralds

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   137.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

138. Refer to Figure 3-13. Suppose Peru decides to increase its production of emeralds by 2. What is the opportunity cost of this decision?

  a. 30 rubies
  b. 40 rubies
  c. 60 rubies
  d. 120 rubies

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   138.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

139. Refer to Figure 3-13. Suppose Madagascar is willing to trade 40 rubies to Peru for each emerald that Peru produces and sends to Madagascar. Which of the following combinations of emeralds and rubies could Peru then consume, assuming Peru specializes in emerald production?

  a. 2 emeralds and 240 rubies
  b. 3 emeralds and 220 rubies
  c. 4 emeralds and 200 rubies
  d. 5 emeralds and 140 rubies

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   139.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

Figure 3-14

Arturo’s Production Possibilities Frontier Dina’s Production Possibilities Frontier

 

140. Refer to Figure 3-14. Arturo’s opportunity cost of one burrito is

  a. 3/4 taco and Dina’s opportunity cost of one burrito is 1/2 taco.
  b. 3/4 taco and Dina’s opportunity cost of one burrito is 2 tacos.
  c. 4/3 tacos and Dina’s opportunity cost of one burrito is 1/2 taco.
  d. 4/3 tacos and Dina’s opportunity cost of one burrito is 2 tacos.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   140.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

141. Refer to Figure 3-14. Arturo would incur an opportunity cost of 36 burritos if he increased his production of tacos by

  a. 27.
  b. 48.
  c. 108.
  d. 144.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   141.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

142. Refer to Figure 3-14. Which of the following is not correct?

  a. Arturo and Dina could each consume 100 tacos and 100 burritos without trade.
  b. Neither Arturo nor Dina could each consume 200 tacos and 200 burritos without trade.
  c. Arturo and Dina could each consume 200 tacos and 200 burritos with trade.
  d. Total consumption of burritos could not be 600 either with or without trade.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   142.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

143. Refer to Figure 3-14. Suppose Arturo is willing to trade 6 burritos to Dina for each 10 tacos that Dina produces and sends to Arturo. Which of the following combinations of tacos and burritos could Dina then consume, assuming Dina specializes in taco production and Arturo specializes in burrito production?

  a. 100 tacos and 200 burritos
  b. 200 tacos and 130 burritos
  c. 300 tacos and 60 burritos
  d. 340 tacos and 40 burritos

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   143.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

144. Refer to Figure 3-14. Arturo has an absolute advantage in the production of

  a. burritos and a comparative advantage in the production of tacos.
  b. burritos and a comparative advantage in the production of burritos.
  c. neither good and a comparative advantage in the production of tacos.
  d. neither good and a comparative advantage in the production of burritos.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   144.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

145. Refer to Figure 3-14. Dina has an absolute advantage in the production of

  a. burritos and a comparative advantage in the production of tacos.
  b. burritos and a comparative advantage in the production of burritos.
  c. neither good and a comparative advantage in the production of tacos.
  d. neither good and a comparative advantage in the production of burritos.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   145.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

146. Refer to Figure 3-14. Arturo should specialize in the production of

  a. tacos and Dina should specialize in the production of burritos.
  b. burritos and Dina should specialize in the production of tacos.
  c. both goods and Dina should specialize in the production of neither good.
  d. neither good and Dina should specialize in the production of both goods.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   146.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

147. Refer to Figure 3-14. If Arturo and Dina switch from each person dividing their time equally between the production of tacos and burritos to each person spending all of their time producing the good in which they have a comparative advantage, then total production of burritos will increase by

  a. 50.
  b. 100.
  c. 150.
  d. 300.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   147.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

148. Refer to Figure 3-14. At which of the following prices would both Arturo and Dina gain from trade with each other?

  a. 12 burritos for 21 tacos
  b. 12 burritos for 27 tacos
  c. 12 burritos for 36 tacos
  d. Arturo and Dina could not both gain from trade with each other at any price.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.084 – Determine which terms of trade allow two countries with differing productivity levels to gain from trade.
TOPICS:   International trade
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   148.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

149. Refer to Figure 3-14. Arturo and Dina would not be able to gain from trade if Dina’s opportunity cost of one taco changed to

  a. 1/2 burrito.
  b. 3/4 burrito.
  c. 4/3 burritos.
  d. 2 burritos.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.084 – Determine which terms of trade allow two countries with differing productivity levels to gain from trade.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   149.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

150. Refer to Figure 3-14. Without trade, Arturo produced and consumed 240 tacos and 120 burritos and Dina produced and consumed 100 tacos and 150 burritos. Then, each person agreed to specialize in the production of the good in which they have a comparative advantage and trade 260 tacos for 156 burritos. As a result, Arturo gained

  a. 20 tacos and 24 burritos and Dina gained 40 tacos and 6 burritos.
  b. 20 tacos and 36 burritos and Dina gained 160 tacos and 6 burritos.
  c. 260 tacos and 144 burritos and Dina gained 140 tacos and 156 burritos.
  d. 260 tacos and 156 burritos and Dina gained 260 tacos and 156 burritos.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   150.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

Figure 3-15

Perry’s Production Possibilities Frontier Jordan’s Production Possibilities Frontier

 

151. Refer to Figure 3-15. The opportunity cost of 1 novel for Perry is

  a. 1/6 poem.
  b. 2 poems.
  c. 6 poems.
  d. 12 poems.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   151.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

152. Refer to Figure 3-15. The opportunity cost of 1 novel for Jordan is

  a. 1/3 poem.
  b. 3 poems.
  c. 4 poems.
  d. 12 poems.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   152.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

153. Refer to Figure 3-15. The opportunity cost of 1 poem for Perry is

  a. 1/12 novel.
  b. 1/6 novel.
  c. 2 novels.
  d. 6 novels.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   153.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

154. Refer to Figure 3-15. The opportunity cost of 1 poem for Jordan is

  a. 1/2 novel.
  b. 1/3 novel.
  c. 3 novels.
  d. 4 novels.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   154.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

155. Refer to Figure 3-15. Which of the following is not correct?

  a. Perry and Jordan could each consume 2 novels and 6 poems without trade.
  b. Jordan could consume 2 novels and 6 poems both with and without trade.
  c. Perry and Jordan could each consume 2 novels and 6 poems with trade.
  d. Perry and Jordan could each consume 12 poems without trade.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   155.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

156. Refer to Figure 3-15. Suppose Perry is willing to trade 4 poems to Jordan for each novel that Jordan writes and sends to Perry. Which of the following combinations of novels and poems could Jordan then consume, assuming Jordan specializes in novel production and Perry specializes in poem production?

  a. 1 novel and 14 poems
  b. 2 novels and 8 poems
  c. 3 novels and 6 poems
  d. 4 novels and 2 poems

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   156.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

157. Refer to Figure 3-15. Perry has an absolute advantage in the production of

  a. novels and Jordan has an absolute advantage in the production of poems.
  b. poems and Jordan has an absolute advantage in the production of novels.
  c. novels and Jordan has an absolute advantage in the production of neither good.
  d. neither good and Jordan has an absolute advantage in the production of novels.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   157.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

158. Refer to Figure 3-15. Perry has a comparative advantage in the production of

  a. novels and Jordan has a comparative advantage in the production of poems.
  b. poems and Jordan has a comparative advantage in the production of novels.
  c. novels and Jordan has a comparative advantage in the production of neither good.
  d. neither good and Jordan has a comparative advantage in the production of novels.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   158.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

159. Refer to Figure 3-15. Perry should specialize in the production of

  a. novels.
  b. poems.
  c. both goods.
  d. neither good.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   159.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

160. Refer to Figure 3-15. Jordan should specialize in the production of

  a. novels.
  b. poems.
  c. both goods.
  d. neither good.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   160.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

161. Refer to Figure 3-15. If Perry and Jordan switch from each person dividing their time equally between the production of novels and poems to each person spending all of their time producing the good in which they have a comparative advantage, then total production of novels will increase by

  a. 1.
  b. 2.
  c. 3.
  d. 4.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   161.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

162. Refer to Figure 3-15. If Perry and Jordan each spends all of his/her time producing the good in which s/he has a comparative advantage and trade takes place at a price of 1 novel for 7 poems, then

  a. Perry and Jordan will both gain from this trade.
  b. Perry will gain from this trade, but Jordan will not.
  c. Jordan will gain from this trade, but Perry will not.
  d. neither Perry nor Jordan will gain from this trade.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   162.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

Figure 3-16

Hosne’s Production Possibilities Frontier Merve’s Production Possibilities Frontier

 

163. Refer to Figure 3-16. Hosne’s opportunity cost of one purse is

  a. 4/5 wallet and Merve’s opportunity cost of one purse is 2/3 wallet.
  b. 4/5 wallet and Merve’s opportunity cost of one purse is 3/2 wallets.
  c. 5/4 wallets and Merve’s opportunity cost of one purse is 2/3 wallet.
  d. 5/4 wallets and Merve’s opportunity cost of one purse is 3/2 wallets.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   163.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

164. Refer to Figure 3-16. Hosne’s opportunity cost of one wallet is

  a. 4/5 purse and Merve’s opportunity cost of one wallet is 2/3 purse.
  b. 4/5 purse and Merve’s opportunity cost of one wallet is 3/2 purses.
  c. 5/4 purses and Merve’s opportunity cost of one wallet is 2/3 purse.
  d. 5/4 purses and Merve’s opportunity cost of one wallet is 3/2 purses.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   164.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

165. Refer to Figure 3-16. Hosne has an absolute advantage in the production of

  a. purses and Merve has an absolute advantage in the production of wallets.
  b. wallets and Merve has an absolute advantage in the production of purses.
  c. both goods and Merve has an absolute advantage in the production of neither good.
  d. neither good and Merve has an absolute advantage in the production of both goods.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   165.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

166. Refer to Figure 3-16. Hosne has a comparative advantage in the production of

  a. purses and Merve has a comparative advantage in the production of wallets.
  b. wallets and Merve has a comparative advantage in the production of purses.
  c. both goods and Merve has a comparative advantage in the production of neither good.
  d. neither good and Merve has a comparative advantage in the production of both goods.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   166.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

167. Refer to Figure 3-16. Hosne should specialize in the production of

  a. purses.
  b. wallets.
  c. both goods.
  d. neither good.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   167.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

168. Refer to Figure 3-16. Merve should specialize in the production of

  a. purses.
  b. wallets.
  c. both goods.
  d. neither good.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   168.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

169. Refer to Figure 3-16. If Hosne and Merve switch from each person dividing her time equally between the production of purses and wallets to each person spending all of her time producing the good in which she has a comparative advantage, then total production of purses will increase by

  a. 2.
  b. 3.
  c. 5.
  d. 10.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   169.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

170. Refer to Figure 3-16. At which of the following prices would both Hosne and Merve gain from trade with each other?

  a. 5 wallets for 1.25 purses
  b. 5 wallets for 2.5 purses
  c. 5 wallets for 3.75 purses
  d. Hosne and Merve could not both gain from trade with each other at any price.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.084 – Determine which terms of trade allow two countries with differing productivity levels to gain from trade.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   170.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

Figure 3-17

Maxine’s Production Possibilities Frontier Daisy’s Production Possibilities Frontier

 

171. Refer to Figure 3-17. Suppose Maxine decides to increase her production of tarts by 5. What is the opportunity cost of this decision?

  a. 2/5 pie
  b. 2 pies
  c. 5/2 pies
  d. 10 pies

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   171.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

172. Refer to Figure 3-17. Suppose Daisy decides to increase her production of pies by 6. What is the opportunity cost of this decision?

  a. 8/3 tarts
  b. 4.5 tarts
  c. 8 tarts
  d. 10 tarts

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   172.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

173. Refer to Figure 3-17. Suppose Daisy is willing to trade 3/4 tart to Maxine for each pie that Maxine makes and sends to Daisy. Which of the following combinations of pies and tarts could Maxine not then consume, assuming Maxine specializes in making pies and Daisy specializes in making tarts?

  a. 4 pies and 6 tarts
  b. 6 pies and 5 tarts
  c. 8 pies and 3 tarts
  d. 10 pies and 1.5 tarts

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   173.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

174. Refer to Figure 3-17. Maxine has an absolute advantage in the production of

  a. both goods and a comparative advantage in the production of pies.
  b. both goods and a comparative advantage in the production of tarts.
  c. neither good and a comparative advantage in the production of pies.
  d. neither good and a comparative advantage in the production of tarts.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   174.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

175. Refer to Figure 3-17. Daisy has an absolute advantage in the production of

  a. both goods and a comparative advantage in the production of pies.
  b. both goods and a comparative advantage in the production of tarts.
  c. neither good and a comparative advantage in the production of pies.
  d. neither good and a comparative advantage in the production of tarts.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   175.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

176. Refer to Figure 3-17. If Maxine and Daisy switch from each person dividing her time equally between the production of pies and tarts to each person spending all of her time producing the good in which she has a comparative advantage, then total production of tarts will increase by

  a. 7.
  b. 10.
  c. 17.
  d. 20.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   176.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

177. Refer to Figure 3-17. At which of the following prices would both Maxine and Daisy gain from trade with each other?

  a. 4 tarts for 2 pies
  b. 8 tarts for 12 pies
  c. 12 tarts for 28 pies
  d. Maxine and Daisy could not both gain from trade with each other at any price.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.084 – Determine which terms of trade allow two countries with differing productivity levels to gain from trade.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   177.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

Figure 3-18

Bintu’s Production Possibilities Frontier Juba’s Production Possibilities Frontier

 

178. Refer to Figure 3-18. The opportunity cost of 1 bowl for Bintu is

  a. 1/4 cup.
  b. 1/2 cup.
  c. 2 cups.
  d. 4 cups.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   178.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

179. Refer to Figure 3-18. The opportunity cost of 1 bowl for Juba is

  a. 1/4 cup.
  b. 2/3 cup.
  c. 3/2 cups.
  d. 4 cups.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   179.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

180. Refer to Figure 3-18. The opportunity cost of 1 cup for Bintu is

  a. 1/8 bowl.
  b. 1/4 bowl.
  c. 4 bowls.
  d. 8 bowls.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   180.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

181. Refer to Figure 3-18. The opportunity cost of 1 cup for Juba is

  a. 1/6 bowl.
  b. 2/3 bowl.
  c. 3/2 bowls.
  d. 6 bowls.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   181.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

182. Refer to Figure 3-18. Suppose Juba is willing to trade one bowl to Bintu for every two cups that Bintu makes and sends to Juba. Which of the following combinations of bowls and cups could Bintu then consume, assuming Bintu specializes in making cups and Juba specializes in making bowls?

  a. 1 bowl and 7 cups
  b. 2 bowls and 4 cups
  c. 3 bowls and 3 cups
  d. 4 bowls and 1 cup

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   182.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

183. Refer to Figure 3-18. Bintu has an absolute advantage in the production of

  a. bowls and Juba has an absolute advantage in the production of cups.
  b. cups and Juba has an absolute advantage in the production of bowls.
  c. both goods and Juba has an absolute advantage in the production of neither good.
  d. neither good and Juba has an absolute advantage in the production of both goods.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   183.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

184. Refer to Figure 3-18. Bintu has a comparative advantage in the production of

  a. bowls and Juba has a comparative advantage in the production of cups.
  b. cups and Juba has a comparative advantage in the production of bowls.
  c. both goods and Juba has a comparative advantage in the production of neither good.
  d. neither good and Juba has a comparative advantage in the production of both goods.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   184.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

185. Refer to Figure 3-18. If Bintu and Juba switch from each person dividing her time equally between the production of cups and bowls to each person spending all of her time producing the good in which she has a comparative advantage, then total production will increase by

  a. 1 bowl and 1 cup.
  b. 2 bowls and 4 cups.
  c. 3 bowls and 5 cups.
  d. 4 bowls and 8 cups.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   185.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

Figure 3-19

Chile’s Production Possibilities Frontier Colombia’s Production Possibilities Frontier

 

186. Refer to Figure 3-19. Chile’s opportunity cost of one pound of coffee is

  a. 3/4 pound of soybeans and Colombia’s opportunity cost of one pound of coffee is 1/2 pound of soybeans.
  b. 3/4 pound of soybeans and Colombia’s opportunity cost of one pound of coffee is 2 pounds of soybeans.
  c. 4/3 pounds of soybeans and Colombia’s opportunity cost of one pound of coffee is 1/2 pound of soybeans.
  d. 4/3 pounds of soybeans and Colombia’s opportunity cost of one pound of coffee is 2 pounds of soybeans.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   186.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

187. Refer to Figure 3-19. Chile’s opportunity cost of one pound of soybeans is

  a. 3/4 pound of coffee and Colombia’s opportunity cost of one pound of soybeans is 1/2 pound of coffee.
  b. 3/4 pound of coffee and Colombia’s opportunity cost of one pound of soybeans is 2 pounds of coffee.
  c. 4/3 pounds of coffee and Colombia’s opportunity cost of one pound of soybeans is 1/2 pound of coffee.
  d. 4/3 pounds of coffee and Colombia’s opportunity cost of one pound of soybeans is 2 pounds of coffee.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   187.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

188. Refer to Figure 3-19. Chile would incur an opportunity cost of 36 pounds of coffee if it increased its production of soybeans by

  a. 12 pounds.
  b. 27 pounds.
  c. 30 pounds.
  d. 48 pounds.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   188.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

189. Refer to Figure 3-19. Colombia would incur an opportunity cost of 24 pounds of coffee if it increased its production of soybeans by

  a. 12 pounds.
  b. 18 pounds.
  c. 36 pounds.
  d. 48 pounds.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   189.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

190. Refer to Figure 3-19. Chile has an absolute advantage in the production of

  a. coffee and Colombia has an absolute advantage in the production of soybeans.
  b. soybeans and Colombia has an absolute advantage in the production of coffee.
  c. both goods and Colombia has an absolute advantage in the production of neither good.
  d. neither good and Colombia has an absolute advantage in the production of both goods.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   190.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

191. Refer to Figure 3-19. Chile has a comparative advantage in the production of

  a. coffee and Colombia has a comparative advantage in the production of soybeans.
  b. soybeans and Colombia has a comparative advantage in the production of coffee.
  c. both goods and Colombia has a comparative advantage in the production of neither good.
  d. neither good and Colombia has a comparative advantage in the production of both goods.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   191.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

192. Refer to Figure 3-19. If Chile and Colombia switch from each country dividing its time equally between the production of coffee and soybeans to each country spending all of its time producing the good in which it has a comparative advantage, then total production of soybeans will increase by

  a. 3 pounds.
  b. 6 pounds.
  c. 9 pounds.
  d. 12 pounds.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   192.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

193. Refer to Figure 3-19. At which of the following prices would both Chile and Colombia gain from trade with each other?

  a. 6 pounds of soybeans for 9 pounds of coffee
  b. 8 pounds of soybeans for 20 pounds of coffee
  c. 11 pounds of soybeans for 33 pounds of coffee
  d. Chile and Colombia could not both gain from trade with each other at any price.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.084 – Determine which terms of trade allow two countries with differing productivity levels to gain from trade.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   193.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

194. Refer to Figure 3-19. If Chile and Colombia each spends all of its time producing the good in which it has a comparative advantage and the countries agree to trade 7 pounds of coffee for 5 pounds of soybeans, then Chile will consume

  a. 7 pounds of coffee and 7 pounds of soybeans and Colombia will consume 5 pounds of coffee and 5 pounds of soybeans.
  b. 7 pounds of coffee and 7 pounds of soybeans and Colombia will consume 5 pounds of coffee and 11 pounds of soybeans.
  c. 23 pounds of coffee and 7 pounds of soybeans and Colombia will consume 5 pounds of coffee and 5 pounds of soybeans.
  d. 23 pounds of coffee and 7 pounds of soybeans and Colombia will consume 5 pounds of coffee and 11 pounds of soybeans.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   194.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

195. Refer to Figure 3-19. Chile and Colombia would not be able to gain from trade if Colombia’s opportunity cost of one pound of soybeans changed to

  a. 1/2 pound of coffee.
  b. 3/4 pound of coffee.
  c. 4/3 pounds of coffee.
  d. 2 pounds of coffee.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.084 – Determine which terms of trade allow two countries with differing productivity levels to gain from trade.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   195.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

Figure 3-20

Canada’s Production Possibilities Frontier Mexico’s Production Possibilities Frontier

 

196. Refer to Figure 3-20. Canada’s opportunity cost of one unit of Good X is

  a. 1/2 unit of Good Y and Mexico’s opportunity cost of one unit of Good X is 1/2 unit of Good Y.
  b. 1/2 unit of Good Y and Mexico’s opportunity cost of one unit of Good X is 2 units of Good Y.
  c. 2 units of Good Y and Mexico’s opportunity cost of one unit of Good X is 1/2 unit of Good Y.
  d. 2 units of Good Y and Mexico’s opportunity cost of one unit of Good X is 2 units of Good Y.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   196.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

197. Refer to Figure 3-20. Canada’s opportunity cost of one unit of Good Y is

  a. 1/2 unit of Good X and Mexico’s opportunity cost of one unit of Good Y is 1/2 unit of Good X.
  b. 1/2 unit of Good X and Mexico’s opportunity cost of one unit of Good Y is 2 units of Good X.
  c. 2 units of Good X and Mexico’s opportunity cost of one unit of Good Y is 1/2 unit of Good X.
  d. 2 units of Good X and Mexico’s opportunity cost of one unit of Good Y is 2 units of Good X.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   197.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

198. Refer to Figure 3-20. Canada would incur an opportunity cost of 6 units of Good X if it increased its production of Good Y by

  a. 3 units.
  b. 6 units.
  c. 9 units.
  d. 12 units.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   198.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

199. Refer to Figure 3-20. Mexico would incur an opportunity cost of 8 units of Good X if it increased its production of Good Y by

  a. 2 units.
  b. 4 units.
  c. 6 units.
  d. 8 units.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   199.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

200. Refer to Figure 3-20. Canada has an absolute advantage in the production of

  a. Good X and Mexico has an absolute advantage in the production of Good Y.
  b. Good Y and Mexico has an absolute advantage in the production of Good X.
  c. both goods and Mexico has an absolute advantage in the production of neither good.
  d. neither good and Mexico has an absolute advantage in the production of both goods.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   200.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

201. Refer to Figure 3-20. Canada has a comparative advantage in the production of

  a. Good X and Mexico has a comparative advantage in the production of Good Y.
  b. Good Y and Mexico has a comparative advantage in the production of Good X.
  c. both goods and Mexico has a comparative advantage in the production of neither good.
  d. neither good and Mexico has a comparative advantage in the production of both goods.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   201.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

202. Refer to Figure 3-20. If Canada and Mexico switch from each country dividing its time equally between the production of Good X and Good Y to each country spending all of its time producing the good in which it has a comparative advantage, then total production of Good X will increase by

  a. 3 units.
  b. 6 units.
  c. 9 units.
  d. 12 units.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   202.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

203. Refer to Figure 3-20. If Canada and Mexico switch from each country dividing its time equally between the production of Good X and Good Y to each country spending all of its time producing the good in which it has a comparative advantage, then total production of Good Y will increase by

  a. 3 units.
  b. 6 units.
  c. 9 units.
  d. 12 units.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   203.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

204. Refer to Figure 3-20. At which of the following prices would both Canada and Mexico gain from trade with each other?

  a. 9 units of Good Y for 6 units of Good X
  b. 8 units of Good Y for 20 units of Good X
  c. 70 units of Good Y for 30 units of Good X
  d. Canada and Mexico could not both gain from trade with each other at any price.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.084 – Determine which terms of trade allow two countries with differing productivity levels to gain from trade.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   204.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

Figure 3-21

Uzbekistan’s Production Possibilities Frontier Azerbaijan’s Production Possibilities Frontier

 

205. Refer to Figure 3-21. Azerbaijan’s opportunity cost of one nail is

  a. 1/4 bolt and Uzbekistan’s opportunity cost of one nail is 1/2 bolt.
  b. 1/4 bolt and Uzbekistan’s opportunity cost of one nail is 2 bolts.
  c. 4 bolts and Uzbekistan’s opportunity cost of one nail is 1/2 bolt.
  d. 4 bolts and Uzbekistan’s opportunity cost of one nail is 2 bolts.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   205.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

206. Refer to Figure 3-21. Azerbaijan’s opportunity cost of one bolt is

  a. 1/4 nail and Uzbekistan’s opportunity cost of one bolt is 1/2 nail.
  b. 1/4 nail and Uzbekistan’s opportunity cost of one bolt is 2 nails.
  c. 4 nails and Uzbekistan’s opportunity cost of one bolt is 1/2 nail.
  d. 4 nails and Uzbekistan’s opportunity cost of one bolt is 2 nails.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   206.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

207. Refer to Figure 3-21. Suppose Uzbekistan decides to increase its production of bolts by 10. What is the opportunity cost of this decision?

  a. 1/2 nail
  b. 2 nails
  c. 5 nails
  d. 20 nails

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   207.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

208. Refer to Figure 3-21. Suppose Azerbaijan decides to increase its production of nails by 20. What is the opportunity cost of this decision?

  a. 1/4 bolt
  b. 4 bolts
  c. 5 bolts
  d. 80 bolts

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   208.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

209. Refer to Figure 3-21. Suppose Azerbaijan is willing to trade 3 nails to Uzbekistan for every bolt that Uzbekistan makes and sends to Azerbaijan. Which of the following combinations of bolts and nails could Azerbaijan then consume, assuming Uzbekistan specializes in making bolts and Azerbaijan specializes in making nails?

  a. 8 bolts and 56 nails
  b. 14 bolts and 44 nails
  c. 18 bolts and 32 nails
  d. 20 bolts and 26 nails

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   209.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

210. Refer to Figure 3-21. Suppose Azerbaijan is willing to trade 3 nails to Uzbekistan for every bolt that Uzbekistan makes and sends to Azerbaijan. Which of the following combinations of bolts and nails could Uzbekistan then consume, assuming Uzbekistan specializes in making bolts and Azerbaijan specializes in making nails?

  a. 7 bolts and 70 nails
  b. 12 bolts and 56 nails
  c. 17 bolts and 40 nails
  d. 25 bolts and 15 nails

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.163 – Given a graph of a production possibilities frontier, identify a bundle as inefficient, efficient, feasible, or infeasible.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   210.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

211. Refer to Figure 3-21. Azerbaijan has an absolute advantage in the production of

  a. bolts and a comparative advantage in the production of bolts.
  b. bolts and a comparative advantage in the production of nails.
  c. nails and a comparative advantage in the production of bolts.
  d. nails and a comparative advantage in the production of nails.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   211.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

212. Refer to Figure 3-21. If Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan switch from each country dividing its time equally between the production of bolts and nails to each country spending all of its time producing the good in which it has a comparative advantage, then total production will increase by

  a. 5 bolts and 10 nails.
  b. 15 bolts and 40 nails.
  c. 20 bolts and 50 nails.
  d. 30 bolts and 80 nails.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   212.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

213. Refer to Figure 3-21. If Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan each spends all its time producing the good in which it has a comparative advantage and trade takes place at a price of 12 bolts for 36 nails, then

  a. neither Uzbekistan nor Azerbaijan will gain from this trade.
  b. Uzbekistan will gain from this trade, but Azerbaijan will not.
  c. Azerbaijan will gain from this trade, but Uzbekistan will not.
  d. both Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan will gain from this trade.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   213.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

214. Refer to Figure 3-21. Without trade, Uzbekistan produced and consumed 12 bolts and 36 nails and Azerbaijan produced and consumed 14 bolts and 24 nails. Then, each country agreed to specialize in the production of the good in which it has a comparative advantage and trade 16 bolts for 38 nails. As a result, Uzbekistan gained

  a. 2 bolts and 2 nails and Azerbaijan gained 2 bolts and 18 nails.
  b. 4 bolts and 2 nails and Azerbaijan gained 2 bolts and 14 nails.
  c. 14 bolts and 38 nails and Azerbaijan gained 16 bolts and 42 nails.
  d. 16 bolts and 38 nails and Azerbaijan gained 16 bolts and 38 nails.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   214.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

Figure 3-22
Alice and Betty’s Production Possibilities in one 8-hour day.

Alice’s Production Possibilities Frontier Betty’s Production Possibilities Frontier

 

215. Refer to Figure 3-22. What are Alice and Betty’s opportunity costs of 1 pizza?

  a. Alice’s opportunity cost of 1 pizza is 1/2 of a pitcher of lemonade and Betty’s opportunity cost of 1 pizza is 2/3 of a pitcher of lemonade.
  b. Alice’s opportunity cost of 1 pizza is 1 pitcher of lemonade and Betty’s opportunity cost of 1 pizza is 3 pitchers of lemonade.
  c. Alice’s opportunity cost of 1 pizza is 2 pitchers of lemonade and Betty’s opportunity cost of 1 pizza is 1.5 pitchers of lemonade.
  d. Alice’s opportunity cost of 1 pizza is 400 pitchers of lemonade and Betty’s opportunity cost of 1 pizza is 450 pitchers of lemonade.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   215.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

216. Refer to Figure 3-22. What are Alice and Betty’s opportunity costs of 1 pitcher of lemonade?

  a. Alice’s opportunity cost of 1 pitcher of lemonade is 1/2 of a pizza and Betty’s opportunity cost of 1 pitcher of lemonade is 2/3 of a pizza.
  b. Alice’s opportunity cost of 1 pitcher of lemonade is 2 pizzas and Betty’s opportunity cost of 1 pitcher of lemonade is 1.5 pizzas.
  c. Alice’s opportunity cost of 1 pitcher of lemonade is 10 pizzas and Betty’s opportunity cost of 1 pitcher of lemonade is 10 pizzas.
  d. Alice’s opportunity cost of 1 pitcher of lemonade is 200 pizzas and Betty’s opportunity cost of 1 pitcher of lemonade is 300 pizzas.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   216.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

217. Refer to Figure 3-22. Which of the following statements is correct regarding absolute advantage?

  a. Alice has an absolute advantage in the production of both lemonade and pizzas.
  b. Betty has an absolute advantage in the production of both lemonade and pizzas.
  c. Alice has an absolute advantage in the production of pizzas while Betty has an absolute advantage in the production of lemonade.
  d. Alice has an absolute advantage in the production of lemonade while Betty has an absolute advantage in the production of pizzas.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   217.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

218. Refer to Figure 3-22. Which of the following statements is correct regarding comparative advantage?

  a. Alice has a comparative advantage in the production of both lemonade and pizzas.
  b. Betty has a comparative advantage in the production of both lemonade and pizzas.
  c. Alice has a comparative advantage in the production of pizzas while Betty has a comparative advantage in the production of lemonade.
  d. Alice has a comparative advantage in the production of lemonade while Betty has a comparative advantage in the production of pizzas.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   218.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

219. Refer to Figure 3-22. Which of the following prices would result in an mutually advantageous trade for Alice and Betty?

  a. 100 pizzas for 100 pitchers of lemonade
  b. 100 pizzas for 125 pitchers of lemonade
  c. 100 pizzas for 180 pitchers of lemonade
  d. 100 pizzas for 220 pitchers of lemonade

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.084 – Determine which terms of trade allow two countries with differing productivity levels to gain from trade.
TOPICS:   International trade
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   219.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-31

  Labor Hours Needed to Make 1 Pound of:  Amount Produced in 40 hours
 Meat  Potatoes Meat Potatoes
Farmer 8 hours/pound 5 hours/pound 5 pounds 8 pounds
Rancher 4 hours/pound 10 hours/pound 10 pounds 4 pounds

 

220. Refer to Table 3-31. For the farmer, the opportunity cost of 1 pound of meat is

  a. 0.625 pound of potatoes.
  b. 1.6 pounds of potatoes.
  c. 5 pounds of potatoes.
  d. 8 pounds of potatoes.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   220.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

221. Refer to Table 3-31. For the farmer, the opportunity cost of 15 pounds of meat is

  a. 12 pounds of potatoes.
  b. 16 pounds of potatoes.
  c. 20 pounds of potatoes.
  d. 24 pounds of potatoes.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   221.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

222. Refer to Table 3-31. For the rancher, the opportunity cost of 1 pound of meat is

  a. 0.4 pound of potatoes.
  b. 2.5 pounds of potatoes.
  c. 4 pounds of potatoes.
  d. 10 pounds of potatoes.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   222.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

223. Refer to Table 3-31. For the rancher, the opportunity cost of 16 pounds of meat is

  a. 4.0 pounds of potatoes.
  b. 5.2 pounds of potatoes.
  c. 6.4 pounds of potatoes.
  d. 9.6 pounds of potatoes.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   223.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

224. Refer to Table 3-31. For the farmer, the opportunity cost of 1 pound of potatoes is

  a. 0.625 pound of meat.
  b. 1.0 pounds of meat.
  c. 1.6 pounds of meat.
  d. 3.2 pounds of meat.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   224.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

225. Refer to Table 3-31. For the farmer, 12.8 pounds of

  a. meat is the opportunity cost of 10.6 pounds of potatoes.
  b. meat is the opportunity cost of 16.0 pounds of potatoes.
  c. potatoes is the opportunity cost of 6.8 pounds of meat.
  d. potatoes is the opportunity cost of 8.0 pounds of meat.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   225.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

226. Refer to Table 3-31. In 10 hours,

  a. the rancher could produce 2.5 pounds of meat and 1.0 pound of potatoes.
  b. the rancher could produce 1.0 pound of meat and 1.0 pound of potatoes.
  c. the farmer could produce 0.25 pounds of meat and 1.6 pounds of potatoes.
  d. the farmer could produce 0.75 pounds of meat and 1.25 pounds of potatoes.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Efficiency
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   226.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

227. Refer to Table 3-31. Relative to the farmer, the rancher has an absolute advantage in the production of

  a. meat, but not in the production of potatoes.
  b. potatoes, but not in the production of meat.
  c. both meat and potatoes.
  d. neither meat nor potatoes.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   227.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

228. Refer to Table 3-31. Relative to the rancher, the farmer has a comparative advantage in the production of

  a. meat, but not in the production of potatoes.
  b. potatoes, but not in the production of meat.
  c. both meat and potatoes.
  d. neither meat nor potatoes.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   228.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

229. Refer to Table 3-31. Relative to the rancher, the farmer has

  a. a comparative advantage in the production of meat, because the farmer’s opportunity cost of a pound of meat is lower than the rancher’s opportunity cost of a pound of meat.
  b. a comparative advantage in the production of potatoes, because the rancher requires less time than the farmer to produce a pound of potatoes.
  c. a comparative advantage in the production of potatoes; relative to the farmer, the rancher has a comparative advantage in the production of meat.
  d. an absolute advantage in the production of both meat and potatoes.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   229.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

Figure 3-23
The graph below represents the various combinations of ham and cheese (in pounds) that the nation of Bonovia could produce in a given month.

 

230. Refer to Figure 3-23. For Bonovia, what is the opportunity cost of a pound of cheese?

  a. 0.8 pounds of ham
  b. 1.25 pounds of ham
  c. 8 pounds of ham
  d. 16 pounds of ham

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   230.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

231. Refer to Figure 3-23. Whenever Bonovia increases its production of ham by 1 pound per month, then it must decrease its production of cheese by

  a. 0.75 pound.
  b. 0.80 pound.
  c. 1.00 pounds.
  d. 1.25 pounds.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   231.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

232. Refer to Figure 3-23. The nation of Cropitia has a comparative advantage over Bonovia in producing ham if

  a. Cropitia can produce more than 400 pounds of ham per month.
  b. Cropitia can produce more than 320 pounds of cheese per month.
  c. Cropitia’s opportunity cost of producing a pound of ham is less than 0.8 pounds of cheese.
  d. Cropitia’s opportunity cost of producing a pound of ham is greater than 0.8 pounds of cheese.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   232.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

233. Refer to Figure 3-23. In the nation of Cropitia, the opportunity cost of a pound of cheese is 1.5 pounds of ham. Bonovia and Cropitia both can gain from trading with one another if one pound of cheese trades for

  a. 1.0 pound of ham.
  b. 1.4 pounds of ham.
  c. 2.1 pounds of ham.
  d. All of the above are correct.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.084 – Determine which terms of trade allow two countries with differing productivity levels to gain from trade.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   233.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

234. Refer to Figure 3-23. In the nation of Cropitia, the opportunity cost of a pound of ham is 0.3 pounds of cheese. Bonovia and Cropitia both can gain from trading with one another if one pound of ham trades for

  a. 0.40 pounds of cheese.
  b. 0.55 pounds of cheese.
  c. 0.75 pounds of cheese.
  d. All of the above are correct.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.084 – Determine which terms of trade allow two countries with differing productivity levels to gain from trade.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   234.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-32

US and French Production Opportunities

  Wine (in millions of gallons) Cheese (in millions of lbs.)
US 16 32
France 8 4

 

235. Refer to Table 3-32 The US has a comparative advantage in the production of

  a. wine.
  b. cheese.
  c. both wine and cheese.
  d. neither wine nor cheese.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   235.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

236. Refer to Table 3-32 France has an absolute advantage in the production of

  a. wine.
  b. cheese.
  c. both wine and cheese.
  d. neither wine nor cheese.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   236.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

237. Refer to Table 3-32 The opportunity costs for the US and France are as follows:

  a. In the US 1 million gallons of wine costs 1/2 million pounds of cheese and in France 1 million gallons of wine costs 2 million pounds of cheese.
  b. In the US 1 million gallons of wine costs 2 million pounds of cheese and in France 1 million gallons of wine costs 1/2 million pounds of cheese.
  c. In the US 1 million pounds of cheese costs 1/2 million gallons of wine and in France 1 million pounds of cheese costs 2 million gallons of wine.
  d. In the US 1 million pounds of cheese costs 16 million gallons of wine and in France 1 million pounds of cheese costs 8 million gallons of wine.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   237.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-33

Chris and Tony’s Production Opportunities

  Tomatoes Pasta Sauce
Chris 10 lbs 300 jars
Tony 14 lbs 280 jars

 

238. Refer to Table 3-33 Chris and Tony both produce tomatoes and pasta sauce. The table shows their possible production per month if both work the same number of 8 hour days. Given this information, Chris’s opportunity cost of 1 lb. of tomatoes is

  a. 2 jars of sauce and Tony’s opportunity cost of 1 lb. of tomatoes is 3 jars of sauce.
  b. 3 jars of sauce and Tony’s opportunity cost of 1 lb. of tomatoes is 2 jars of sauce.
  c. 20 jars of sauce and Tony’s opportunity cost of 1 lb. of tomatoes is 30 jars of sauce.
  d. 30 jars of sauce and Tony’s opportunity cost of 1 lb. of tomatoes is 20 jars of sauce.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   238.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

239. Refer to Table 3-33 Chris and Tony both produce tomatoes and pasta sauce. The table shows their possible production per month if both work the same number of 8 hour days. If Chris and Tony both decide to specialize and produce only the good in which they have a comparative advantage, then

  a. Chris will produce only sauce and Tony will produce only tomatoes.
  b. Chris will produce only tomatoes and Tony will produce only sauce.
  c. Both Chris and Tony will produce only sauce.
  d. Both Chris and Tony will produce only tomatoes.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.107 – Explain how comparative advantage leads to specialization.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   239.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

240. Refer to Table 3-33 Chris and Tony both produce tomatoes and pasta sauce. The table shows their possible production per month if both work the same number of 8 hour days. Which of the following statements is correct?

  a. Tony has a comparative advantage in the production of sauce.
  b. Chris has a comparative advantage in the production of tomatoes.
  c. Tony has an absolute advantage in the production of tomatoes.
  d. Chris has an absolute advantage in the production of tomatoes.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   240.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

241. Refer to Table 3-33 Chris and Tony both produce tomatoes and pasta sauce. The table shows their possible production per month if both work the same number of 8 hour days. Which of the following prices would result in a mutually advantageous trade between Chris and Tony?

  a. 1 lb. of tomatoes for 23 jars of sauce
  b. 1 lb. of tomatoes for 27 jars of sauce
  c. 1 lb. of tomatoes for 33 jars of sauce
  d. .Both a and b are correct.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.084 – Determine which terms of trade allow two countries with differing productivity levels to gain from trade.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   241.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

242. Adam Smith

  a. and David Ricardo both opposed free trade.
  b. opposed free trade, but David Ricardo supported it.
  c. supported free trade, but David Ricardo opposed it.
  d. and David Ricardo both supported free trade.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Easy
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.012 – Apply basic, economic principles of individual decision making that determine how an economy generally works.
TOPICS:   Economic thinking
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   242.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

243. Adam Smith asserted that a person should never attempt to make at home

  a. what it will cost him more to make than to buy.
  b. any good in which that person does not have an absolute advantage.
  c. any luxury good.
  d. any necessity.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.012 – Apply basic, economic principles of individual decision making that determine how an economy generally works.
TOPICS:   Economic thinking
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   243.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

244. Which famous economist developed the principle of comparative advantage as we know it today?

  a. Adam Smith
  b. David Ricardo
  c. John Maynard Keynes
  d. Milton Friedman

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Easy
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.012 – Apply basic, economic principles of individual decision making that determine how an economy generally works.
TOPICS:   Economic thinking
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Knowledge
CUSTOM ID:   244.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

245. Which of the following is not correct?

  a. Economists are generally united in their support of free trade.
  b. The conclusions of Adam Smith and David Ricardo on the gains from trade have held up well over time.
  c. David Ricardo argued that Britain should not restrict imports of grain.
  d. Economists’ opposition to trade restrictions is still based largely on the principle of absolute advantage.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Easy
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.012 – Apply basic, economic principles of individual decision making that determine how an economy generally works.
TOPICS:   Economic thinking
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Knowledge
CUSTOM ID:   245.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

246. Economists generally support

  a. trade restrictions.
  b. government management of trade.
  c. export subsidies.
  d. free international trade.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.012 – Apply basic, economic principles of individual decision making that determine how an economy generally works.
TOPICS:   International trade
Free trade
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Comprehension
CUSTOM ID:   246.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-34

 

Assume that Indonesia and India can switch between producing rice and bananas at a constant rate.

   Labor Hours Needed to Make 1 Unit of Number of Units Produced in 40 Hours
 Rice Bananas Rice Bananas
Indonesia 2 5 20 8
India 4 2 10 20

 

 
 

 

247. Refer to Table 3-34. Indonesia’s opportunity cost of producing bananas is

  a. 2.5 units of rice. This is higher than India’s opportunity cost of producing bananas.
  b. 2.5 units of rice. This is lower than India’s opportunity cost of producing bananas.
  c. 2/5 units of rice. This is higher than India’s opportunity cost of producing bananas.
  d. 2/5 units of rice. This is lower than India’s opportunity cost of producing bananas.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   247.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

248. Refer to Table 3-34. India’s opportunity cost of producing rice is

  a. 1/2 units of bananas. This is higher than Indonesia’s opportunity cost of producing rice.
  b. 1/2 units of bananas. This is lower than Indonesia’s opportunity cost of producing rice.
  c. 2 units of bananas. This is higher than Indonesia’s opportunity cost of producing rice.
  d. 2 units of bananas. This is lower than Indonesia’s opportunity cost of producing rice.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   248.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

249. Refer to Table 3-34. For which good(s) does Indonesia have a comparative advantage

  a. rice and bananas.
  b. rice but not bananas.
  c. bananas but not rice.
  d. nether rice nor bananas.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   249.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

250. Refer to Table 3-34. At which of the following prices, if any, can India and Indonesia both gain from trade?

  a. 1/5 units of bananas per unit of rice.
  b. 1/3 units of bananas per unit of rice.
  c. 3/5 units of bananas per unit of rice.
  d. None of the above.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.084 – Determine which terms of trade allow two countries with differing productivity levels to gain from trade.
TOPICS:   International trade
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   250.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-35

  Labor Hours Needed
to Produce
1 Dozen Eggs 1 Pound Ham
Denmark 10 8
Finland 6 4

 

251. Refer to Table 3-35. Denmark’s opportunity cost of producing 1dozen eggs is

  a. 5/4 pounds of ham. This is higher than Finland’s opportunity cost of producing 1dozen eggs.
  b. 5/4 pounds of ham. This is lower than Finland’s opportunity cost of producing 1 dozen eggs.
  c. 4/5 pounds of ham. This is higher than Finland’s opportunity cost of producing 1 dozen eggs.
  d. 4/5 pounds of ham. This is lower than Finland’s opportunity cost of producing 1 dozen eggs.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   251.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

252. Refer to Table 3-35. Finland’s opportunity cost of producing 1 unit of ham is

  a. 3/2 dozen eggs. This is higher than Denmark’s opportunity cost.
  b. 3/2 dozen eggs. This is lower than Denmark’s opportunity cost.
  c. 2/3 dozen eggs. This is higher than Denmark’s opportunity cost.
  d. 2/3 dozen eggs. This is lower than Denmark’s opportunity cost.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   252.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

253. Refer to Table 3-35. Which good(s) does Denmark have an absolute advantage producing?

  a. both eggs and ham.
  b. eggs but not ham.
  c. ham but not eggs.
  d. neither ham nor eggs.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   253.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

254. Refer to Table 3-35. Which good(s) does Finland have an absolute advantage producing?

  a. both eggs and ham.
  b. eggs but not ham.
  c. ham but not eggs.
  d. neither ham nor eggs.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   254.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

255. Refer to Table 3-35. At which of the following prices, if any, could both Denmark and Finland gain from trade?

  a. 2/3 pounds of ham per dozen eggs.
  b. 1 pound of ham per dozen eggs.
  c. 1.4 pounds of ham per dozen eggs.
  d. None of the above are correct.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.084 – Determine which terms of trade allow two countries with differing productivity levels to gain from trade.
TOPICS:   International trade
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Analysis
CUSTOM ID:   255.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

Figure 3-24

The production possibilities frontiers below show how much Bob and Betty can each produce in 8 hours of time.

Bob’s Production Possibilities Frontier Betty’s Production Possibilities Frontier

 

256. Refer to Figure 3-24. Bob has

  a. an absolute and comparative advantage producing good x.
  b. an absolute but not a comparative advantage producing good x.
  c. a comparative but not an absolute advantage producing good x.
  d. neither a comparative nor an absolute advantage producing good x.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   256.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

257. Refer to Figure 3-24. Betty has

  a. an absolute and comparative advantage producing good x.
  b. an absolute but not a comparative advantage producing good x.
  c. a comparative but not an absolute advantage producing good x.
  d. neither a comparative nor an absolute advantage producing good x.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   257.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-36

  Minutes Needed
to Make 1
  Towel Umbrella
Antigua 12 20
Barbuda 15 10

 

258. Refer to Table 3-36. What is Antigua’s opportunity cost of one towel?

  a. 3/5 umbrellas
  b. 2/3 umbrellas
  c. 3/2 umbrellas
  d. 5/3 umbrellas

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   258.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

259. Refer to Table 3-36. What is Antigua’s opportunity cost of one umbrella?

  a. 3/5 towels
  b. 2/3 towels
  c. 3/2 towels
  d. 5/3 towels

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   259.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

260. Refer to Table 3-36. What is Barbuda’s opportunity cost of one towel?

  a. 3/5 umbrellas
  b. 2/3 umbrellas
  c. 3/2 umbrellas
  d. 5/3 umbrellas

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   260.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

261. Refer to Table 3-36. What is Barbuda’s opportunity cost of one umbrella?

  a. 3/5 towels
  b. 2/3 towels
  c. 3/2 towels
  d. 5/3 towels

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Challenging
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   261.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

262. Refer to Table 3-36. Antigua has an absolute advantage in the production of

  a. towels and Barbuda has an absolute advantage in the production of umbrellas.
  b. umbrellas and Barbuda has an absolute advantage in the production of towels.
  c. both goods and Barbuda has an absolute advantage in the production of neither good.
  d. neither good and Barbuda has an absolute advantage in the production of both goods.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   262.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

263. Refer to Table 3-36. Antigua has a comparative advantage in the production of

  a. towels and Barbuda has a comparative advantage in the production of umbrellas.
  b. umbrellas and Barbuda has a comparative advantage in the production of towels.
  c. both goods and Barbuda has a comparative advantage in the production of neither good.
  d. neither good and Barbuda has a comparative advantage in the production of both goods.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Production possibilities model
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   263.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

264. Refer to Table 3-36. If Antigua and Barbuda decide to trade with each other, Antigua should specialize in the production of

  a. towels and Barbuda should specialize in the production of umbrellas.
  b. umbrellas and Barbuda should specialize in the production of towels.
  c. both goods and Barbuda should specialize in the production of neither good.
  d. neither good and Barbuda should specialize in the production of both goods.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   264.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

265. Refer to Table 3-36. Assume that Antigua and Barbuda each has 60 minutes available. If each island spends all its time producing the good in which it has a comparative advantage, then total production is

  a. 4 towels and 3 umbrellas.
  b. 5 towels and 6 umbrellas.
  c. 8 towels and 10 umbrellas.
  d. 9 towels and 9 umbrellas.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.074 – Determine the gains from trade for two producers with different productivity levels.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   265.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

Table 3-37

   Output of pottery in one six-hour session
   Vases Mugs
 Sarah  8  32
 Charles  10  25

 

266. ​Refer to Table 3-37. Sarah and Charles are both potters and each can switch between the production of vases and mugs at a constant rate.  The table shows the total number of vases or decorative mugs that each person can produce in a six-hour session of producing pottery.

  a. ​Sarah has an absolute advantage in the production of vases and Charles has an absolute advantage in the production of mugs.
  b. ​Sarah has an absolute advantage in the production of mugs and Charles has an absolute advantage in the production of vases.
  c. Charles has an absolute advantage of both vases and mugs.
  d. ​Sarah has an absolute advantage in both vases and mugs.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   266.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

267. ​Refer to Table 3-37. Sarah and Charles are both potters and each can switch between the production of vases and mugs at a constant rate.  The table shows the total number of vases or decorative mugs that each person can produce in a six-hour session of producing pottery.  Sarah’s opportunity cost to produce one vase is

  a. ​0.25 mugs and Charles’s opportunity cost of producing one vase is 2.5 mugs
  b. ​4 mugs and Charles’s opportunity cost of producing one vase is 2.5 mugs
  c. ​0.25 mugs and Charles’s opportunity cost of producing one vase is 0.40 mugs
  d. ​4 mugs and Charles’s opportunity cost of producing one vase is 0.40 mugs

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Production possibilities model
Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   267.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

268. ​Refer to Table 3-37. Sarah and Charles are both potters and each can switch between the production of vases and mugs at a constant rate.  The table shows the total number of vases or decorative mugs that each person can produce in a six-hour session of producing pottery. Sarah has an absolute advantage in

  a. ​the production of vases and a comparative advantage in the production of vases.
  b. ​the production of mugs and a comparative advantage in the production of mugs.
  c. ​the production of neither good and a comparative advantage in the production of vases.
  d. ​the production of both goods and a comparative advantage in the production of mugs.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Comparative advantage
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   268.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

269. ​Refer to Table 3-37. Sarah and Charles are both potters and each can switch between the production of vases and mugs at a constant rate.  The table shows the total number of vases or decorative mugs that each person can produce in a six-hour session of producing pottery.  Sarah should specialize in the production of

  a. ​mugs and Charles should specialize in the production of vases.
  b. ​vases and Charles should specialize in the production of mugs.
  c. ​both goods and Charles should specialize in the production of neither good.
  d. ​neither good and Charles should specialize in the production of both good.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.107 – Explain how comparative advantage leads to specialization.
TOPICS:   Specialization
Comparative advantage
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   269.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

270. ​Refer to Table 3-37. Sarah and Charles are both potters and each can switch between the production of vases and mugs at a constant rate.  The table shows the total number of vases or decorative mugs that each person can produce in a six-hour session of producing pottery. Suppose that Sarah and Charles produce for two 6-hour sessions and they split this time equally between the production of vases and mugs.   If they then produce for two 6-hour sessions and produce only the good that each person has the comparative advantage for, then total production of

  a. ​vases would rise by 20 and total production of mugs would rise by 32.
  b. ​vases would rise by 2 and total production of mugs would rise by 27.
  c. ​vases would rise by 2 and total production of mugs would rise by 7.
  d. ​vases would rise by 18 and total production of mugs would rise by 25.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Difficult
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   Gains from trade
Comparative advantage
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   270.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

271. Refer to Table 3-37. Sarah and Charles are both potters and each can switch between the production of vases and mugs at a constant rate.  The table shows the total number of vases or decorative mugs that each person can produce in a six-hour session of producing pottery.  Sarah and Charles could benefit from trading with each other if they traded at a price of

  a. ​5 vases per mug
  b. ​0.5 mugs per vase
  c. ​3 mugs per vase
  d. ​1.5 vases per mug

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Difficult
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.084 – Determine which terms of trade allow two countries with differing productivity levels to gain from trade.
TOPICS:   Gains from trade
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   271.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

​Table 3-38

   Output produced in one growing season
  Corn Soybeans
Iowa  30 45
Nebraska   40 80

 

272. ​Refer to Table 3-38.  Iowa and Nebraska can both produce corn and soybeans, and can switch between the production of corn and soybeans at a constant rate. The table illustrates the amount of corn or soybeans each state can produce in one growing season. Based upon the information in the table, we can determine that

  a. ​Iowa has an absolute advantage in corn and Nebraska has an absolute advantage in soybeans.
  b. ​Nebraska has an absolute advantage in corn and Iowa has an absolute advantage in soybeans.
  c. ​Iowa has an absolute advantage in both corn and soybeans.
  d. ​Nebraska has an absolute advantage in both corn and soybeans.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   272.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

273. ​Refer to Table 3-38.  Iowa and Nebraska can both produce corn and soybeans, and can switch between the production of corn and soybeans at a constant rate. The table illustrates the amount of corn or soybeans each state can produce in one growing season.  Using the information from the table, Iowa’s opportunity cost of producing one bushel of corn is

  a. ​1.5 bushels of soybeans and Nebraska’s is 2 bushels of soybeans.
  b. ​1.5 bushels of soybeans and Nebraska’s is 0.5 bushels of soybeans.
  c. ​0.67 bushels of soybeans and Nebraska’s is 2 bushels of soybeans.
  d. ​0.67 bushels of soybeans and Nebraska’s is 0.5 bushels of soybeans.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.278 – Given information on production possibilities, determine the opportunity cost for producing each commodity.
TOPICS:   Opportunity cost
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   273.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

274. ​Refer to Table 3-38.  Iowa and Nebraska can both produce corn and soybeans, and can switch between the production of corn and soybeans at a constant rate. The table illustrates the amount of corn or soybeans each state can produce in one growing season.  From the table we know that Iowa has a

  a. ​comparative advantage in the production of soybeans and Nebraska has a comparative advantage in the production of corn.
  b. ​comparative advantage in the production of corn and Nebraska has a comparative advantage in the production of soybeans.
  c. ​comparative advantage in both goods and Nebraska has a comparative advantage in neither good.
  d. ​comparative advantage in neither good and Nebraska has a comparative advantage in both goods.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   274.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

275. ​Refer to Table 3-38.  Iowa and Nebraska can both produce corn and soybeans, and can switch between the production of corn and soybeans at a constant rate. The table illustrates the amount of corn or soybeans each state can produce in one growing season. From the table we know that Nebraska has a

  a. ​comparative advantage in the production of soybeans and Iowa has a comparative advantage in the production of corn.
  b. ​comparative advantage in the production of corn and Iowa has a comparative advantage in the production of soybeans.
  c. ​comparative advantage in both goods and Iowa has a comparative advantage in neither good.
  d. ​comparative advantage in neither good and Iowa has a comparative advantage in both goods.

 

ANSWER:   a
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   275.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

276. ​Refer to Table 3-38.  Iowa and Nebraska can both produce corn and soybeans, and can switch between the production of corn and soybeans at a constant rate. The table illustrates the amount of corn or soybeans each state can produce in one growing season. From this table, we know that Nebraska has an absolute advantage in the production of

  a. ​corn and a comparative advantage in the production of soybean.
  b. ​both goods and a comparative advantage in the production of soybeans.
  c. ​corn and a comparative advantage in the production of corn.
  d. ​both goods and a comparative advantage in the production of corn.

 

ANSWER:   b
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.082 – Determine whether a producer has an absolute advantage, a comparative advantage, or both, by comparing two producers’ production advantages.
TOPICS:   Absolute advantage
Comparative advantage
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   276.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

277. ​Refer to Table 3-38.  Iowa and Nebraska can both produce corn and soybeans, and can switch between the production of corn and soybeans at a constant rate. The table illustrates the amount of corn and soybeans each state can produce in one growing season. From this table, we can conclude that Iowa should specialize in the production of

  a. ​both goods and Nebraska should specialize in the production of neither good.
  b. ​neither good and Iowa should specialize in the production of both goods.
  c. ​corn and Nebraska should specialize in the production of soybeans.
  d. ​soybeans and Nebraska should specialize in the production of corn.

 

ANSWER:   c
DIFFICULTY:   Moderate
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.107 – Explain how comparative advantage leads to specialization.
TOPICS:   Comparative advantage
Specialization
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   277.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

278. ​Refer to Table 3-38.  Iowa and Nebraska can both produce corn and soybeans, and can switch between the production of corn and soybeans at a constant rate. The table illustrates the amount of corn or soybeans each state can produce in one growing season. At which of the following prices would both Iowa and Nebraska be able to gain from trade with each other?

  a. ​1 bushel of soybeans for 1.7 bushels of corn.
  b. ​2.5 bushels of soybeans for 1 bushel of corn,
  c. ​3 bushels of corn for 1 bushel of soybeans.
  d. ​1.8 bushels of soybeans for 1 bushel of corn.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Difficult
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.084 – Determine which terms of trade allow two countries with differing productivity levels to gain from trade.
TOPICS:   Gains from trade
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   278.03.2 – MC – MANK08

 

1. Which of the following is not an example of the principle that trade can make everyone better off?

  a. Americans buy tube socks from China.
  b. Residents of Maine drink orange juice from Florida.
  c. A homeowner hires the kid next door to mow the lawn.
  d. All of the above are examples of the principle that trade can make everyone better off.

 

ANSWER:   d
DIFFICULTY:   Easy
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:   ECON.MANK.089 – Evaluate the potential gains from trade using comparative and absolute advantage.
TOPICS:   International trade
KEYWORDS:   BLOOM’S: Application
CUSTOM ID:   001.03.4 – MC – MANK08

 

 

Additional information

Add Review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *